RESEARCH ARTICLE

Potential use of dried persimmon (Diospyros kaki) byproducts as feed sources for ruminants

Sang Moo Lee1,2,#https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2510-2591, Tabita Dameria Marbun1,2,#https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3360-9715, Eun Joong Kim1,2,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5962-6994
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Korea
2Research Institute for Innovative Animal Science, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Korea

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

*Corresponding author: Eun Joong Kim, Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Korea. Tel: +82-54-530-1228, E-mail: ejkim2011@knu.ac.kr

© Copyright 2024 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jul 07, 2023; Revised: Aug 03, 2023; Accepted: Aug 04, 2023

Published Online: Jul 31, 2024

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the chemical composition, in vitro digestibility, and palatability of dried persimmon byproducts (persimmon peel [PP] and damaged whole persimmons [WP]) ensiled with rice straw in different mixing ratios. PP and WP were ensiled with rice straw at ratios of 3:7 (PP3R7, WP3R7), 5:5 (PP5R5, WP5R5), 7:3 (PP7R3, WP7R3), and 8:2 (PP8R2, WP8R2) for 70 d. WP3R7 had the highest (p < 0.05) crude protein and lactate contents compared to the other combinations. On the other hand, PP3R7 and PP8R2 had lower concentrations of neutral and acid-detergent fibers (p < 0.05) and produced lower amounts of ammonia-N (p < 0.05). The silages were compared to rice straw silage (RS), maize silage (MS), whole-crop rye silage (WCRS), and sorghum-sudangrass silage (SSGS) during an in vitro study. The results showed that PP8R2 and WP7R3 had higher (p < 0.05) dry matter digestibility values than RS, MS, WCRS, and SSGS in a 6 h incubation period. In addition, a palatability test of the silages was conducted on Hanwoo cattle, goats, and deer, using the cafeteria method. The palatability index rate of PP7R3 was the highest (p < 0.05) for the goats and the Hanwoo cattle, whereas PP8R2 had the highest (p < 0.05) rate for the deer and the Hanwoo cattle. In conclusion, dried persimmon byproducts in the form of PP and WPs can be used as ruminant feed when ensiled with RS at ratios of 7:3 and 8:2.

Keywords: Dried persimmon byproducts; In vitro; Palatability; Ruminants; Silage

INTRODUCTION

Recently, ruminants’ production has been challenged with significant environmental issues [1]. These challenges have included feed production, transport, and utilization, which are responsible for environmental problems such as greenhouse gas emissions [2]. Wilkinson [3] reported that the conversion of human-inedible input into human-edible output could be shaped to improve efficiency and achieve sustainability in the ruminant industry. These ideas are supported by the ability of ruminants to convert inedible input, such as crop residues or agricultural byproducts, into high-protein edible products, such as meat and milk [4]. Interest in using agricultural byproducts as feed for ruminants is increasing due to these byproducts’ nutritive values, including those of some bioactive compounds that remain even after industrial processing [5].

Persimmon (Diospyros kaki) peel (PP) is a byproduct of dried persimmon manufacturing, while damaged whole persimmons (WP) are ripped or misshaped persimmons that have lost their economic value. During dried persimmon production, a considerable amount of peel is produced as waste, as are damaged and commercially unavailable persimmons [6]. Most farmers in the dried persimmon industry discard these byproducts or utilize them as fertilizer. However, we speculated that these two byproducts might have potential as sources of ruminant feed in their base forms or with minimal processing, facilitating the production of the meat or milk of the ruminants. Previous studies have reported the use of PP as animal feed. Lee et al. [6] demonstrated the beneficial effects of PP for crossbred pigs. The fatty acid and cholesterol concentrations improved without any remarkable changes in growth performance or meat quality. PP also exhibited the beneficial effects of improving egg quality and layer hen performance in a study conducted by Oh et al. [7]. PP silage showed no negative effect on feed intake or palatability when fed to sheep as 20% dry matter (DM) partial substitution of tall fescue [8]. Another study showed that when PP was added to total mixed ration (TMR) silage, it could resist protein breakdown during ensiling [9]. WP have the same composition as ordinary persimmons, including bioactive compounds such as sugars, vitamins, tannins, dietary fiber, carotenoids, minerals, amino acids, and lipids [10,11]. The benefits of persimmons have been studied in humans in order to treat several diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, and cancer [12].

Similarly to other agricultural byproducts, these byproducts have high moisture contents that are vulnerable to energy loss during storage [13], as well as to the development of mold. Therefore, in this study, we mixed these byproducts with rice straw. Rice straw has a high DM content but is low in nutritive value and ruminant palatability [14,15]. Some studies have shown that ensiling rice straw with other agricultural byproducts has the potential to enhance the quality of the silage and have beneficial effects on animals [1618]. We hypothesized that ensiling dried persimmon byproducts with rice straw would enhance the nutritive value of the mixed silages. Therefore, this study evaluated the chemical compositions, digestibility, and palatability of PP and WP, which are byproducts of the dried persimmon industry, ensiled together with rice straw at various ratios in order to be used as ruminant feed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Silage preparation, sampling procedure, and silage quality assessment

Persimmon peel (PP) and damaged WP were collected from local dried persimmon industries in Sangju-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do (refer to Table 1 for the chemical compositions of the samples). These byproducts were divided into eight treatments and mixed with rice straw at ratios (DM basis, Table 2) of 3:7 (PP3R7, WP3R7), 5:5 (PP5R5, WP5R5), 7:3 (PP7R3, WP7R3), and 8:2 (PP8R2, WP8R2). Each of the treatments was prepared in a 30 kg quantity, anaerobically packed into 20 L plastic containers in triplicate, and ensiled for 70 d.

Table 1. Chemical compositions of dried persimmon byproducts ensiled in this study
Variable Persimmon peel Damaged whole persimmons Rice straw
DM (%) 28.63 24.56 74.7
OM (%) 97.59 98.06
EE (% DM) 0.73 2.23
CP (% DM) 3.62 3.94
ND (% DM) 32.69 23.73
ADF (% DM) 23.90 17.57
Total tannin (g/100 g) 4.28 1.91

DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; EE, ether extract; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber.

Download Excel Table
Table 2. Mixing ratios of persimmon peel and damaged whole persimmons with rice straw
Treatment1) Mixing ratio (DM basis)
Persimmon peel (PP) Damaged whole persimmons (WP) Rice straw (R)
PP3R7 3 - 7
PP5R5 5 - 5
PP7R3 7 - 3
PP8R2 8 - 2
WP3R7 - 3 7
WP5R5 - 5 5
WP7R3 - 7 3
WP8R2 - 8 2

1) PP3R7, PP5R5, PP7R3, PP8R2, persimmon peel mixed with rice straw at ratios of 3:7, 5: 5, 7:3, and 8:2, respectively; WP3R7, WP5R5, WP7R3, WP8R2, damaged whole persimmons mixed with rice straw at ratios of 3:7, 5:5, 7:3, and 8:2, respectively.

Download Excel Table

After a 70 d ensiling period, the silages were removed, homogenized, and randomly sampled using the coning and quartering method [19]. An aliquot of 300 g of the samples, was oven-dried at 65°C for 3 d to obtain the initial DM value. The dried samples were weighed and ground so they could pass through a 1 mm screen using an ultra-centrifugal mill (ZM 2000, Retch, Haan, Germany), and each sample was used for proximate analysis and determination of tannin content. Another 100 g of the fresh samples was mixed with 900 mL of distilled water and homogenized using a stomacher (Daihan Scientific, Wonju, Korea) for 4 min. The supernatant of each sample was used to determine the silage pH; and the ammonia-N, lactate, and acetate concentrations.

The DM (AOAC: 934.01), organic matter (OM; AOAC: 942.05), crude protein (CP; AOAC: 984.13), and ether extract (EE; AOAC: 920.39A) were analyzed according to AOAC [20] methods. An ANKOM2000 fiber analyzer (ANKOM Technology, Macedon, NY, USA) was utilized to determine the neutral detergent fiber (NDF; AOAC: 2002.04) and acid detergent fiber (ADF; AOAC: 973.18) contents [20,21]. The tannin content was analyzed according to the method used by Price and Butler [22]. The ammonia-N concentration was measured with the method used by Chaney and Marbach [23]. The lactate concentrations of the silages were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (Series 200; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) with a 300 × 7.8 mm Aminex® HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA). A total of 0.008 N H2SO4 was utilized as a mobile phase, with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min; the column oven was set at 35°C and detection was performed at a wavelength of 210 nm.

Gas chromatography (450-GC, Bruker, Bremen, Germany) with a built-in BR-Wax fame column (BR87503, Bruker, Massachusetts, USA) was utilized to analyze acetate concentrations [24]. The temperatures of the flame ionization detector, injector, and oven were set at 250°C, 250°C, and 100°C, respectively. The airflows of nitrogen, hydrogen, and high-purity air were set at 29, 30, and 300 mL/min, respectively.

The brix degrees (°Bx) of the silages were measured using a PR-101 sugar degree meter (Atago, Tokyo, Japan), while the fructose, glucose, dextran, isomerase, and inverted sugar contents were measured using PALS-14S, PALS-15S, PALS-12S, PALS-16S, and PALS-18S digital refractometers (Atago), respectively. The measurements were conducted using liquid that had originated from the compressed silages.

The silage quality was measured, based on the fermentation products, with Flieg’s score and Flieg’s point. Flieg’s score was obtained based on the lactate, acetate, and butyrate proportions in the silage according to the standard set by Woolford [25]. Flieg’s point was calculated using Kilic [26] equation:

Flieg's point = 220 + ( 2×%DM-15 ) 40 × pH
(1)
In vitro digestibility and palatability study

To determine the dry matter digestibility (DMD) of both the PP and WP silages, in vitro rumen fermentation was conducted according to the method used by Tilley and Terry [27]. An aliquot of 0.5 g of dried and ground sample was placed in a 125 mL serum bottle in triplicate, mixed with 50 mL of filtered rumen fluid combined with McDougall’s buffer [28] at a ratio of 1:4, and incubated at 39°C for periods of 6 and 24 h incubation period. The rumen fluid was obtained from two Korean native cattle fed with rice straw silage (60.9% DM, 1.3% EE, 71.6% NDF, and 46.7% ADF) and concentrate (92.5% DM, 20.4% CP, 4.0% EE, 38.7% NDF, and 19.4% ADF) ad libitum, using a stomach tube before morning feeding, and kept on thermos bottles during transportation to the laboratory. It was mixed, filtered with 4 layers of muslin, heated to 39°C in a water bath, and bubbled with CO2 to obtain an anaerobic condition. The maize silage (MS), rice straw silage (RS), whole-crop rye silage (WCRS), and sorghum-sudangrass silage (SSGS) were chosen for comparisons (refer to Table 3). At each interval, samples were removed from the incubator to determine their total gas production, DMD, pH, and ammonia-N. The total gas production was measured using a 100 mL glass syringe (Z314595, Fortuna® Optima®, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) connected to 3-way stopcock (Sewoon Medical, Cheonan, Korea). The substrate was filtered using 5 × 10 cm nylon bags (R510 concentrate bags, ANKOM Technology) and dried for 24 h at 105°C [15,29]. The supernatant was utilized to analyze the pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA), and ammonia-N concentrations. The VFA produced during the in vitro rumen fermentation was analyzed according to Erwin et al. [24]. While for the ammonia-N analysis, the method used by Chaney and Marbach [23] was employed.

Table 3. Chemical compositions of silages used as controls during in vitro rumen fermentation
Variable Silage
Maize Rice straw Whole-crop rye Sorghum-Sudangrass
DM (%) 27.62 52.29 70.82 31.94
OM (%) 94.20 91.95 95.93 89.92
EE (% DM) 3.04 1.44 3.10 2.34
CP (% DM) 9.31 4.33 10.32 8.04
NDF (% DM) 59.02 65.53 71.31 63.72
ADF (% DM) 38.76 38.98 46.66 43.49
pH 3.82 4.39 5.75 4.16

DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; EE, ether extract; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber.

Download Excel Table

A palatability study was conducted using 3 Hanwoo cattle, 3 Korean black × boar goats, and 3 Korean spotted deer through the cafeteria feeding approach for 10 h for 4 consecutive days [30]. The relative palatability index (RPI) was determined according to the method described by Abdulrazak et al. [31].

Statistical analysis

The results of the proximate and chemical analyses of the silages were subjected to a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by employing general liner models of the SPSS program (version 25, IBM, Madison, NY, USA). In addition, one-way analysis of variance was applied for the in vitro and palatability results. Comparisons among the means were conducted using Duncan’s multiple-range test.

RESULTS

Silage fermentation quality

The chemical compositions and nutritive values of the persimmon byproducts combined with rice straw silage are presented in Table 4. After 70 d of ensiling, all of the replicates of WP8R2 treatment were contaminated with fungi; thus, they have been removed from the subsequent analyses. The type of persimmon byproduct (PP or WP) did not significantly affect the DM content. Nevertheless, it significantly affected (p < 0.05) the concentrations of OM, CP, EE, lactate, acetate, and ammonia-N. The mixing ratios of the persimmon byproducts and the rice straw had significant differences (p < 0.05) in almost all chemical composition content, except for the EE content.

Table 4. Chemical compositions and fermentation characteristics of silages prepared with either persimmon peel or damaged whole persimmons and rice straw
Variable Treatment1) SEM p-value
PP3R7 PP5R5 PP7R3 PP8R2 WP3R7 WP5R5 WP7R3 P2) R P×R
DM (%) 39.91d 33.81c 27.22b 23.34a 41.99d 35.37c 26.36b 0.921 0.156 < 0.001 0.182
OM (% DM) 88.07b 87.74ab 89.12c 91.46d 87.35a 87.79ab 87.41a 0.178 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.001
CP (% DM) 5.95a 6.00a 6.11a 6.08a 5.83a 6.12a 6.79b 0.102 0.018 0.001 0.005
EE (% DM) 2.53b 2.81b 2.60b 2.80b 1.28a 1.49a 1.11a 0.158 < 0.001 0.237 0.721
NDF (% DM) 67.52d 63.09c 56.49b 46.62a 67.18d 62.60c 54.18b 1.032 0.236 < 0.001 0.579
ADF (% DM) 42.99d 40.82c 37.02b 31.44a 43.39d 40.33c 35.32b 0.678 0.303 < 0.001 0.330
pH 4.17d 4.15d 3.99bc 3.89a 4.20d 4.04c 3.96ab 0.023 0.062 < 0.001 0.030
Lactate (g/kg DM) 29.06a 32.12b 44.26c 47.95c 32.45b 41.64c 57.08d 2.976 0.003 < 0.001 0.305
Acetate (g/kg DM) 20.33a 25.99b 36.42c 48.14d 18.39a 22.30ab 31.54c 1.717 0.026 < 0.001 0.696
Lactate:Acetate 1.47ab 1.23a 1.23a 1.00a 1.77b 1.90b 1.81b 0.153 0.001 0.355 0.465
Ammonia-N (g/kg total N) 0.38bc 0.43d 0.35b 0.23a 0.42cd 0.49e 0.53e 0.017 0.000 < 0.001 0.003
Total tannin (g/100 g) 1.92abc 1.69abc 1.46a 1.54ab 2.14c 1.97bc 1.57ab 0.140 0.103 0.016 0.841
Flieg score 84.33cd 81.00abc 79.67ab 74.33a 88.67cd 89.33d 90.00d 1.464 0.005 < 0.001 0.040
Flieg point 116.67cd 106.33b 99.67a 96.33a 121.00d 114.33c 99.33a 2.485 0.002 0.112 0.521

1) PP3R7, PP5R5, PP7R3, PP8R2, persimmon peel mixed with rice straw at ratios of 3:7, 5: 5, 7:3, and 8:2, respectively; WP3R7, WP5R5, WP7R3, damaged whole persimmons mixed with rice straw at ratios of 3:7, 5:5, and 7:3, respectively.

2) P, effect of PP or WP; R, effect of mixing ratio; P×R, interaction between raw materials and mixing ratio.

a–e Mean values with different superscripts within a row differ significantly (p < 0.05).

PP, persimmon peel; , damaged whole persimmons; DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; EE, ether extract; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber.

Download Excel Table

Based on calculations of the organic acid produced after a 70 d fermentation period, the WPs showed a higher (p < 0.05) Flieg score compared to the PP. Interestingly, the lowest (p < 0.05) score was present in the silage with persimmon byproducts and rice straw mixed at a ratio of 2:8. In contrast with Flieg score, the type of byproduct did not affect the Flieg point. However, the lowest Flieg point (p < 0.05) was demonstrated by the silage of persimmon byproducts and rice straw mixed in 2:8 ratios. Nevertheless, the prepared silages were categorized as good quality.

The sugar contents of the mixed persimmon byproducts and rice straw silages are shown in Table 5. The rice straw ensiled with added PP have higher (p < 0.05) sugar contents compared to that ensiled with WP. The °Bx values of the silages are significantly different. Treatments PP5R5 and PP7R3 have the highest (p < 0.05) °Bx, fructose, dextran, and inverted sugar percentages compared to the other treatments. The silages mixed at a byproducts to rice straw ratio of 5:5 show the highest (p < 0.05) sugar contents compared to the others.

Table 5. Sugar contents of silages prepared with either persimmon peel or damaged whole persimmons with rice straw
Variable Treatment1) SEM p-value
PP3R7 PP5R5 PP7R3 PP8R2 WP3R7 WP5R5 WP7R3 P2) R P×R
Sugar (°Bx) 3.80d 3.93e 3.90de 3.57c 3.13b 2.23a 3.10b 0.040 0.001 0.001 < 0.001
Fructose (%) 4.27e 4.47e 4.23e 3.93d 3.03b 2.50a 3.43c 0.095 0.001 0.002 < 0.001
Glucose (%) 3.70d 4.17f 4.00e 3.67d 2.83b 2.23a 3.17c 0.052 0.001 0.001 < 0.001
Dextran (%) 3.60c 3.97d 3.90d 3.50c 3.03b 2.10a 3.03b 0.065 0.001 0.001 < 0.001
Isomerase (%) 3.73d 4.07e 3.50d 3.13c 2.87bc 1.97a 2.73b 0.102 0.001 0.001 < 0.001
Inverted sugar (%) 3.87cd 4.43ef 4.50f 4.13de 3.53b 2.40a 3.63bc 0.102 0.001 0.001 < 0.001

1) PP3R7, PP5R5, PP7R3, and PP8R2, persimmon peel mixed with rice straw at ratios of 3:7, 5: 5, 7:3, and 8:2, respectively; WP3R7, WP5R5, and WP7R3, damaged whole persimmons mixed with rice straw at ratios of 3 7, 5: 5, and 7:3, respectively.

2) P, effect of PP or WP; R, effect of mixing ratios; P×R, interaction between raw materials and mixing ratios.

a–f Mean values with different superscripts within a row differ significantly (p < 0.05).

PP, persimmon peel; 쪠, damaged whole persimmon; °Bx, brix degree.

Download Excel Table
In vitro digestibility and palatability

The in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of the rice straw ensiled with persimmon byproducts compared to those of the MS, RS, WCRS, and SSGS are described in Table 6. At 6 h of incubation, PP7R3, PP8R2, and WP7R3 showed the highest (p < 0.05) DMD compared to the other treatments, and these values are higher than those of the MS, RS, WCRS, and SSGS. Meanwhile, at 24 h of incubation, PP8R2 had the highest (p < 0.05) DMD among the mixed persimmon byproduct and rice straw silages; which is lower (p < 0.05) than those of the maize, whole-crop rye, and sorghum-sudangrass silages but higher (p < 0.05) than the rice straw silage. There was no significant difference in the supernatant pH at 6 h of incubation. However, after the 24 h incubation period, WP3R7 had the highest pH compared to the others. Nevertheless, the pH, ranging from 6.88 to 6.99, was within the normal range for ruminants The total gas production after the 6 h incubation period was different between the treatments. At 24 h, PP8R2 demonstrated the highest (p < 0.05) total gas production compared with the other mixed byproduct and rice straw silages; this is lower (p < 0.05) than those of the maize and whole-crop rye silages but higher (p < 0.05) than the rice straw and sorghum-sudangrass silages. All of the treatments showed lower (p < 0.05) ammonia-N concentrations compared to the maize, whole-crop rye silage and sorghum-sudangrass silages after a 6 h incubation period. However, after a 24 h incubation period, all of the persimmon byproduct silages had comparable ammonia-N concentrations to the maize and rice straw silages.

Table 6. Effects of persimmon peel or damaged whole persimmons and rice straw silages on in vitro rumen fermentation in comparison to various other types of silage
Treatment1) SEM p-value
PP3R7 PP5R5 PP7R3 PP8R2 WP3R7 WP5R5 WP7R3 MS RS WCRS SSGS
Dry matter digestibility (%)
 6 h 17.40a 21.20bc 27.02e 34.93f 17.21a 21.64c 27.10e 24.86de 19.26ab 20.16bc 24.09d 0.728 < 0.001
 24 h 27.76ab 29.37b 33.61cd 39.95e 25.96a 30.84bc 35.95d 47.75g 30.68bc 43.10f 43.09f 1.022 < 0.001
pH
 6 h 6.95 6.94 6.91 6.89 6.95 6.93 6.92 6.90 6.96 6.97 6.83 0.029 0.104
 24 h 6.94d 6.93bcd 6.91abc 6.88a 6.99e 6.94d 6.94cd 6.90ab 6.94d 6.92bcd 6.95d 0.009 < 0.001
Total gas production (mL)
 6 h 17.33cde 18.33cde 19.58de 19.92e 14.83abc 17.00bcde 17.75cde 15.17abcde 13.83abc 11.00a 12.50ab 1.436 0.003
 24 h 37.83a 40.67ab 45.00abcd 52.75de 40.58ab 45.00abcd 50.53cd 65.33f 43.83abc 59.00ef 47.00bcd 2.627 < 0.001
Ammonia-N (mg/100 mL)
 6 h 1.55bc 1.50bc 1.09ab 0.69a 1.72c 1.64bc 1.28bc 3.21e 1.34bc 3.10e 2.35d 0.177 < 0.001
 24 h 0.32a 0.24a 0.19a 0.20a 0.54a 0.32a 0.30a 1.26a 0.20a 3.48b 3.77b 0.427 < 0.001

1) PP3R7, PP5R5, PP7R3, PP8R2, persimmon peel mixed with rice straw at ratios of 3:7, 5: 5, 7:3, and 8:2, respectively; WP3R7, WP5R5, WP7R3, damaged whole persimmons mixed with rice straw at ratios of 3:7, 5: 5, and 7:3, respectively.

a–f Mean values with different superscripts within a row differ significantly (p < 0.05).

PP, persimmon peel; WP, damaged whole persimmon; MS, maize silage, RS, rice straw silage, WCRS, whole-crop rye silage, SSGS, sorghum-sudangrass silage.

Download Excel Table

The total VFA tended to be higher (p = 0.070) in PP5R5, PP8R2, WP5R5, and WP7R3 compared to the maize and whole-crop rye silages at 6 h of incubation (Table 7). However, after 24 h, PP8R2 and the maize silage showed the highest (p < 0.05) total VFA concentrations compared to the others.

Table 7. Effects of persimmon peel or damaged whole persimmons, compared to various types of silages, on volatile fatty acid concentrations during in vitro rumen fermentation
Treatments1) SEM p-value
PP3R7 PP5R5 PP7R3 PP8R2 WP3R7 WP5R5 WP7R3 MS RS RGS WCRS
Total volatile fatty acids (VFA) (mM)
 6 h 27.36 27.89 27.63 29.78 26.64 28.06 28.59 28.8 27.58 28.06 27.58 0.573 0.070
 24 h 49.28a 52.80b 57.10c 63.0ef 48.14a 53.46b 57.58cd 65.36f 47.65a 60.27de 59.2cd 0.944 < 0.001
Acetate (%)
 6 h 70.58b 70.99bc 70.96bc 71.92e 70.70b 70.02a 70.07a 70.06a 71.75e 71.21c 73.02f 0.145 < 0.001
 24 h 67.4ef 65.78d 62.29b 59.62a 67.18e 64.83c 61.73b 64.20c 68.92g 68.03fg 70.96h 0.253 < 0.001
Propionate (%)
 6 h 16.19bc 16.17bc 16.53cd 16.07bc 15.87b 16.77de 16.56cd 17.12e 15.01a 16.02b 15.24a 0.152 < 0.001
 24 h 20.11b 21.83c 26.11e 29.13f 20.26b 22.69c 26.43e 24.78d 18.41a 20.17b 20.39b 0.317 < 0.001
Butyrate (%)
 6 h 10.70ef 10.57de 10.42d 10.13c 10.89f 10.92f 11.22g 10.06c 10.77ef 9.75b 9.11a 0.071 < 0.001
 24 h 10.29f 10.15f 9.56de 9.28d 10.25f 10.29f 9.73e 8.84c 10.46f 8.38b 6.46a 0.104 < 0.001
Valerate (%)
 6 h 0.79ef 0.70bc 0.66b 0.59a 0.76cde 0.70bc 0.65ab 0.84f 0.76de 0.92g 0.82ef 0.020 < 0.001
 24 h 0.77de 0.76d 0.62b 0.55a 0.77de 0.75d 0.66bc 0.81de 0.70c 1.41f 0.82e 0.018 < 0.001
Acetate:Propionate ratio
 6 h 4.36cde 4.39de 4.29bcd 4.48e 4.46e 4.18ab 4.23abc 4.09a 4.78f 4.45de 4.79f 0.048 < 0.001
 24 h 3.35fg 3.02e 2.39b 2.05a 3.32f 2.86d 2.34b 2.59c 3.74h 3.37fg 3.48g 0.047 < 0.001

1) PP3R7, PP5R5, PP7R3, and PP8R2, persimmon peel mixed with rice straw at ratios of 3:7, 5: 5, 7:3 and 8:2, respectively; WP3R7, WP5R5, WP7R3, damaged whole persimmon mixed with rice straw at ratios of 3:7, 5: 5, and 7:3, respectively.

a–h Mean values with different superscripts within a row differ significantly (p < 0.05).

PP, persimmon peel; WP, damaged-whole persimmon; MS: maize silage, RS, rice straw silage, WCRS, whole crop rye silage, SSGS, sorghum-sudangrass silage.

Download Excel Table

The RPIs of the mixed persimmon byproduct and rice straw silages compared to the rice straw silage are presented in Fig. 1. When the silages were offered to deer, the RPIs were significantly different, with the following rankings: PP8R2 < PP7R3 < WP7R3 < RS, PP3R7, PP5R5, WP3R7, and WP5R5. With goats, the RPIs were in the following order: PP7R3 < RS, PP5R5, PP8R2 < PP3R7, WP3R7, WP5R5, and WP7R3. On the other hand, Hanwoo cattle preferred PP7R3, PP8R2, PP5R5 < P3R7, WP3R7 < RS, WP5R5, and WP7R7. Overall, PP7R3 had the highest palatability compared to the rice straw and the other treatments.

jast-66-4-749-g1
Fig. 1. Relative palatability index (RPI) of silages prepared with different ratios of either persimmon peel or damaged whole persimmons and rice straw, and offered to deer, goats, and Hanwoo cattle. PP3R7, PP5R5, PP7R3, PP8R2, persimmon peel mixed with rice straw at ratios of 3:7, 5: 5, 7:3, and 8:2, respectively. WP3R7, WP5R5, WP7R3, damaged whole persimmons mixed with rice straw in 3 7, 5: 5, and 7:3 ratios, respectively. a–dMean values with different superscripts for each animal on the top of the graph bar differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Download Original Figure

DISCUSSION

Silage fermentation quality

Ensiling fruit byproducts with agricultural byproducts such as rice straw is a method used to produce feed with desirable nutrients [32]. In this study, we ensiled persimmon byproducts with rice straw in several mixing ratios for 70 d. The addition of the persimmon byproducts appeared to give lower DM contents compared to the plain rice straw silages [15,33,34], particularly for those with higher amounts of persimmon byproducts which initially had a higher moisture content. For instance, a study by Xue et al. [35], of ensiled rice straw and banana byproducts showed similar results. The WP and rice straw failed to be ensiled at a ratio of 8:2 due to fungal spoilage. We hypothesized that silage that contains more persimmon byproducts would tend to be spoiled by fungi due to the high moisture contents. Gallo et al. [36] mentioned that some fungi, such as Aspergillus spp., have been reported in silage with high moisture.

The ensiling of persimmon byproducts with rice straw increased the CP contents of the silages compared to the original rice straw silages [15,18,34]. Adding agricultural byproducts to rice straw silage has been proven to increase its CP content [35,37]. In this study, WP silages showed higher CP content compared to those with PP. Numerically, the original WP showed higher CP compared to the PP (WP: 3.94%, PP: 3.62%), which can be the reason for the higher CP content of the silages. Thus, the higher WP ratios contents (WP7R3) showed the highest (p < 0.05) CP compared to other treatments. However, during the ensiling period, when proteolysis usually occurs, the rate of this process can be defined by the ammonia-N concentration in the silage [38]. Therefore, the ammonia-N concentration is generally used as an indicator of silage quality [39]. A higher ammonia-N concentration is associated with poor fermentation quality of silage due to Clostridium fermentation and often results in decreased intake [39,40]. However, in our study, the ammonia-N concentration in the silage ranged from 0.2 to 0.5 g/kg total N, which is considered to be good quality [41]. Additionally, a study by Fitri et al. [9] mentioned that addition of PP to TMR silage can decrease proteolytic enzymes during the ensiling period due to the tannins contained in the PP, which have a high affinity to bind with protein and protect against proteolysis [8].

On the other hand, the addition of the persimmon byproducts significantly reduced the NDF and ADF contents during the ensiling. One of the reasons for this might be the xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolase (XTH), which is responsible for cell wall softening, in persimmon [42]. Several other studies have mentioned that fermentation that occurs during the ensiling process can reduce the NDF and ADF contents [43,44]. Morrison [45] mentioned that silage microflora also produces cellulase and hemicellulose enzymes, which results in some fiber loss in silage.

The pH values of the mixed persimmon byproduct silages in this study ranged from 3.89 to 4.20, which is lower than the general pH of rice straw silage [34,46] and fulfills one of the desirable silage characteristics mentioned by McDonald et al. [47]: a pH of 4.2 or less. The pH of the silage mainly resulted from the organic acid produced during the ensiling and became an indicator of the silage fermentation quality [47,48]. In the current study, increased concentrations of lactate and acetate were noted with increased ratios of persimmon byproducts. In addition, lactate in the silage could preserve it and was mainly responsible for its pH dropping [48]. Another point to consider is the DM content of the silage; Kung and Shaver [48] indicated that high DM content is associated with lower lactate content in silage. The mixing ratios of the treatments provided significant differences between the lactate concentrations in the present study. Treatments with ratios featuring more rice straw than persimmon byproducts showed lower lactate concentrations than those with a lower rice straw to persimmon byproduct ratio. The pH of the mixed persimmon byproduct silage in the current study also supports the study conducted by Muck [49], which mentioned that lower pH is related to the moisture content of silage. The mixing ratio affected the pH primarily due to the moisture contents of the silages. For instance, treatment PP8R2, which showed the lowest pH compared to the other treatments, had the highest (p < 0.05) moisture content.

In this study, we did not determine the sugar contents of the raw materials (i.e., PP and WP). However, based on previous studies, we can estimate that the sugar content of the WP was around 11–20°Bx [5052], while that of the PP was around 4.8°Brix [53]. The fermentation process plays an essential role in reducing sugar molecules and converting them into organic acids during the ensiling period [54], as shown by the relatively low sugar contents in the silages after the 70 d. The differences in the sugar contents of the byproduct types might be the reason that there were significant differences in the lactate and acetate concentrations of the silages. During the ensiling period, the fermentation of sugars, contained in the forage crop or substrate, by microorganisms, mostly epiphytic lactic acid bacteria, occurred [48].

In vitro digestibility and palatability study

The in vitro digestibility of the persimmon byproduct mixed with rice straw at the ratios of 7:3 and 8:2, at 6 h of fermentation was higher compared to those of the silages typically fed to ruminants. The results in the current study are in agreement with previous studies using agricultural byproducts [41,55]. This result reflects the NDF and ADF contents of the silage. Gasa, Castrillo [56] reported that the in vitro digestibility reflected the NDF content of the feed in their study. In addition, Getachew et al. [57] demonstrated the negative effect of the NDF content on digestibility. In this study, the persimmon byproduct mixed with rice straw at the ratios of 7:3 and 8:2 showed lower NDF contents compared with the other treatments.

At 6 h of incubation, the total VFA concentrations of the mixed dried persimmon byproduct and rice straw silages were comparable with those of the typical silages fed to ruminants. After 24 h of incubation, most of the silages had higher total VFA compared to the rice straw silage. The PP mixed with rice straw at the 8:2 ratio was similar to maize silage in this regard. This might relate to the sugar contents contained in mixed dried persimmon byproduct and rice straw silages. VFA is generated as the end product of fermentation in the rumen and significantly affects ruminants’ production [58]. Based on our in vitro results, adding dried persimmon industry byproducts to rice straw appears to have the potential to enhance the quality of in vitro rumen fermentation. Previous studies using agricultural byproducts have reported similar results of improved feed digestibility. For example, a study by Li et al. [17] used sweet potato vines as an additive in ensiling rice straw, and a study by Foiklang et al. [59] used grape pomace as an additive reported improved DM digestibility.

The number of animals used in the palatability test in this study did not fulfill the requirement set by Meier et al. [60]. Nevertheless, the results showed perspicuous effects of silage byproducts on the RPI. When offered to the ruminants, the mixed dried persimmon and rice straw silages, especially the PP treatments mixed at byproduct to rice straw ratios of 7:3 and 8:2, showed a higher RPI than rice straw silage. The authors of previous studies that used vegetable and fruit byproducts as additives to ruminant feed reported similar results [32,61]. Provenza [62] reported that ruminants generally select food based on their nutritional needs and tend to avoid toxin-contaminated food. In addition, Baumont [63] also mentioned that ruminants prefer feeds which can provide high satiety levels rapidly. The high RPI of PP silages at 7:3 and 8:2 ratios provide evidence that these silages may be considered nutritious feeds. Both of these PP silages have relatively low NDF and ADF contents, high lactate, acetate, and sugar contents.

In this study, dried persimmon byproducts mixed with rice straw at several ratios showed potential to be used in ruminant feeds. The chemical compositions of the mixed silages were improved as the ratio of dried persimmon byproduct to rice straw increased. During the in vitro rumen fermentation, the DMD and the total VFA concentration of the dried persimmon byproduct and rice straw silages mixed at the ratios of 7:3 and 8:2 were comparable to those of silages usually fed to ruminants, such as maize, whole-crop rye, and sorghum-sudangrass. In addition, when offered to ruminants such as Hanwoo cattle, Korean native goats, and Korean spotted deer, the mixed dried persimmon and rice straw silage showed a higher RPI than the rice straw silage. Further studies of the rumen, total-tract digestibility, and production may be necessary. A further study, related to the economic aspects of incorporation of the persimmon-byproducts-based silages and their effect on greenhouse gas emissions, may also be necessary.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This research was funded by Sangju-si (no. 20161017), Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea.

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly acknowledged the technical support by Drs. Jaeyong Song and Jae Hun Lee.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Lee SM, Marbun TD, Kim EJ.

Data curation: Lee SM, Marbun TD, Kim EJ.

Formal analysis: Lee SM, Marbun TD, Kim EJ.

Methodology: Lee SM, Marbun TD, Kim EJ.

Software: Lee SM, Marbun TD, Kim EJ.

Validation: Lee SM, Marbun TD, Kim EJ.

Investigation: Lee SM, Marbun TD, Kim EJ.

Writing - original draft: Lee SM, Marbun TD, Kim EJ.

Writing - review & editing: Lee SM, Marbun TD, Kim EJ.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal procedures conducted in this study were conducted according to the guidelines and regulations of the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals, approved and issued by Animal Experimentation Ethic Committee of Kyungpook National University, Korea (no. 2017-0025).

REFERENCES

1.

Du Y, Ge Y, Chang J. Global strategies to minimize environmental impacts of ruminant production. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2022; 10:227-40

2.

Salami SA, Luciano G, O’Grady MN, Biondi L, Newbold CJ, Kerry JP, et al. Sustainability of feeding plant by-products: a review of the implications for ruminant meat production. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2019; 251:37-55

3.

Wilkinson JM. Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock. Animal. 2011; 5:1014-22

4.

Oltjen JW, Beckett JL. Role of ruminant livestock in sustainable agricultural systems. J Anim Sci. 1996; 74:1406-9

5.

Correddu F, Caratzu MF, Lunesu MF, Carta S, Pulina G, Nudda A. Grape, pomegranate, olive, and tomato by-products fed to dairy ruminants improve milk fatty acid profile without depressing milk production. Foods. 2023; 12:865

6.

Lee SM, Kim IH, Choi YM. Effects of persimmon peel supplementation on pork quality, palatability, fatty acid composition, and cholesterol level. J Anim Sci Technol. 2016; 58:32

7.

Oh ST, Zheng L, Shin YK, An BK, Kang CW. Effects of dietary persimmon peel and its ethanol extract on the production performance and liver lipids in the late stage of egg production in laying hens. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013; 26:260-5

8.

Abdelazeem S, Takeda K, Kurosu K, Uyeno Y. Fermentative quality and animal acceptability of ensiled persimmon skin with absorbents for practical use in ruminant feed. Animals. 2020; 10:612

9.

Fitri A, Obitsu T, Sugino T, Jayanegara A. Ensiling of total mixed ration containing persimmon peel: evaluation of chemical composition and in vitro rumen fermentation profiles. Anim Sci J. 2020; 91e13403

10.

Gorinstein S, Zachwieja Z, Folta M, Barton H, Piotrowicz J, Zemser M, et al. Comparative contents of dietary fiber, total phenolics, and minerals in persimmons and apples. J Agric Food Chem. 2001; 49:952-7

11.

Taira S. Astringency in persimmon.In: In: Linskens HF, Jackson JF, editors.editors Fruit analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 1995; p p. 97-110

12.

Redpath S, George AP. Health and medicinal benefits of persimmon fruit: a review. Adv Hortic Sci. 2008; 22:244-9

13.

Van Vlierberghe C, Chiboubi A, Carrere H, Bernet N, Santa Catalina G, Frederic S, et al. Improving the storage of cover crops by co-ensiling with different waste types: effect on fermentation and effluent production. Waste Manag. 2022; 154:136-45

14.

Sarnklong C, Cone JW, Pellikaan W, Hendriks WH. Utilization of rice straw and different treatments to improve its feed value for ruminants: a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2010; 23:680-92

15.

Marbun TD, Lee K, Song J, Kwon CH, Yoon D, Lee SM, et al. Effect of lactic acid bacteria on the nutritive value and in vitro ruminal digestibility of maize and rice straw silage. Appl Sci. 2020; 10:7801

16.

Du G, Zhang G, Shi J, Zhang J, Ma Z, Liu X, et al. Keystone taxa Lactiplantibacillus and Lacticaseibacillus directly improve the ensiling performance and microflora profile in co-ensiling cabbage byproduct and rice straw. Microorganisms. 2021; 9:1099

17.

Li P, Ji S, Wang Q, Qin M, Hou C, Shen Y. Adding sweet potato vines improve the quality of rice straw silage. Anim Sci J. 2017; 88:625-32

18.

Chen S, Li J, Dong Z, Wang J, Zhao J, Wang S, et al. Substitution of various agricultural by-products improves fermentation profile and in vitro digestibility of rice straw silage. J Agric Sci. 2022; 160:278-87

19.

Wang X, Cao X, Liu H, Guo L, Lin Y, Liu X, et al. Effects of lactic acid bacteria on microbial metabolic functions of paper mulberry silage: a BIOLOG ECO microplates approach. Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:689174

20.

AOAC [Association of Official Analytical Chemists] International. Official methods of analysisof AOAC International. 21st ed Rockville, MD: AOAC International. 2019

21.

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991; 74:3583-97

22.

Price ML, Butler LG. Rapid visual estimation and spectrophotometric determination of tannin content of sorghum grain. J Agric Food Chem. 1977; 25:1268-73

23.

Chaney AL, Marbach EP. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem. 1962; 8:130-2

24.

Erwin ES, Marco GJ, Emery EM. Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. J Dairy Sci. 1961; 44:1768-71

25.

Woolford MK. The silage fermentation. New York: Marcel Dekker. 1984

26.

Kilic A. Silo feed (instruction, education, and application proposals). Izmir: Bilgehan Press. 1986

27.

Tilley JMA, Terry RA. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass Forage Sci. 1963; 18:104-11

28.

McDougall EI. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochem J. 1948; 43:99-109

29.

Lee K, Marbun TD, Kim S, Song J, Kwon CH, Yoon D, et al. Effect of lactic acid bacteria treatment on nutritive value and in vitro ruminal fermentation of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) silage. J Korean Soc Grassl Forage Sci. 2020; 40:182-9

30.

Evvard JM. A new feeding method and standards for fattening young swine. Ames, IowaAgricultural Experiment Station, Iowa State College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts 1929 Report bulletin No. 118

31.

Abdulrazak SA, Nyangaga J, Fujihara T. Relative palatability to sheep of some browse species, their in sacco degradability and in vitro gas production characteristics. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2001; 14:1580-4

32.

Manju Wadhwa MW, Bakshi MPS, Makkar HPS. Waste to worth: fruit wastes and by-products as animal feed. CAB Rev. 2015; 2015:31

33.

Zhao J, Dong Z, Li J, Chen L, Bai Y, Jia Y, et al. Effects of sugar sources and doses on fermentation dynamics, carbohydrates changes, in vitro digestibility and gas production of rice straw silage. Ital J Anim Sci. 2019; 18:1345-55

34.

Kim JG, Ham JS, Li YW, Park HS, Huh CS, Park BC. Development of a new lactic acid bacterial inoculant for fresh rice straw silage. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017; 30:950-6

35.

Xue Z, Mu L, Cai M, Zhang Y, Wanapat M, Huang B. Effect of using banana by-products and other agricultural residues for beef cattle in southern China. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020; 52:489-96

36.

Gallo A, Giuberti G, Frisvad JC, Bertuzzi T, Nielsen KF. Review on mycotoxin issues in ruminants: occurrence in forages, effects of mycotoxin ingestion on health status and animal performance and practical strategies to counteract their negative effects. Toxins. 2015; 7:3057-111

37.

Cao Y, Zang Y, Lv R, Takahashi T, Yoshida N, Yang H. Effects of adding urea on fermentation quality of pruned persimmon branch silage and its digestibility, preference, nitrogen balance and rumen fermentation in beef cattle. Anim Sci J. 2014; 85:219-26

38.

Davies DR, Merry RJ, Williams AP, Bakewell EL, Leemans DK, Tweed JKS. Proteolysis during ensilage of forages varying in soluble sugar content. J Dairy Sci. 1998; 81:444-53

39.

Charmley E. Towards improved silage quality – a review. Can J Anim Sci. 2001; 81:157-68

40.

Seglar B. Fermentation analysis and silage quality testing [Internet]. University Digital Conservancy. 2003 [cited 2023 Jun 24]https://hdl.handle.net/11299/108997

41.

Meneses M, Megías MD, Madrid J, Martínez-Teruel A, Hernández F, Oliva J. Evaluation of the phytosanitary, fermentative and nutritive characteristics of the silage made from crude artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) by-product feeding for ruminants. Small Rumin Res. 2007; 70:292-6

42.

Han Y, Ban Q, Hou Y, Meng K, Suo J, Rao J. Isolation and characterization of two persimmon xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolase (XTH) genes that have divergent functions in cell wall modification and fruit postharvest softening. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:624

43.

Zhao J, Dong Z, Li J, Chen L, Bai Y, Jia Y, et al. Ensiling as pretreatment of rice straw: the effect of hemicellulase and Lactobacillus plantarum on hemicellulose degradation and cellulose conversion. Bioresour Technol. 2018; 266:158-65

44.

Li J, Yuan X, Desta ST, Dong Z, Mugabe W, Shao T. Characterization of Enterococcus faecalis JF85 and Enterococcus faecium Y83 isolated from Tibetan yak (Bos grunniens) for ensiling Pennisetum sinese. Bioresour Technol. 2018; 257:76-83

45.

Morrison IM. Changes in the cell wall components of laboratory silages and the effect of various additives on these changes. J Agric Sci. 1979; 93:581-6

46.

Li J, Shen Y, Cai Y. Improvement of fermentation quality of rice straw silage by application of a bacterial inoculant and glucose. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2010; 23:901-6

47.

McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed Marlow: Chalcombe Publications. 1991

48.

Kung L, Shaver R. Interpretation and use of silage fermentation analysis reports. Focus Forage. 2001; 3:1-5

49.

Muck RE. Factors influencing silage quality and their implications for management. J Dairy Sci. 1988; 71:2992-3002

50.

Kim JH, Chung IK, Kim HY, Kim KM. Comparison of the quality of dried persimmon (Diospyros kaki THUNB.) treated with medicinal plant extracts and food additives. Food Sci Nutr. 2018; 6:1991-8

51.

Castelló ML, Heredia A, Domínguez E, Ortolá MD, Tarrazó J. Influence of thermal treatment and storage on astringency and quality of a spreadable product from persimmon fruit. Food Chem. 2011; 128:323-9

52.

Jannok P, Kamitani Y, Kawano S. Development of a common calibration model for determining the Brix value of intact apple, pear and persimmon fruits by near infrared spectroscopy. J Near Infrared Spectrosc. 2014; 22:367-73

53.

Kim SK, Lee GD, Chung SK. Monitoring on fermentation of persimmon vinegar from persimmon peel. Korean J Food Sci Technol. 2003; 35:642-7

54.

Linden JC, Henk LL, Murphy VG, Smith DH, Gabrielsen BC, Tengerdy RP, et al. Preservation of potential fermentables in sweet sorghum by ensiling. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1987; 30:860-7

55.

Meneses M, Martínez-Marín AL, Madrid J, Martínez-Teruel A, Hernández F, Megías MD. Ensilability, in vitro and in vivo values of the agro-industrial by-products of artichoke and broccoli. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020; 27:2919-25

56.

Gasa J, Castrillo C, Baucells MD, Guada JA. By-products from the canning industry as feedstuff for ruminants: digestibility and its prediction from chemical composition and laboratory bioassays. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1989; 25:67-77

57.

Getachew G, Robinson PH, DePeters EJ, Taylor SJ. Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2004; 111:57-71

58.

Dijkstra J. Production and absorption of volatile fatty acids in the rumen. Livest Prod Sci. 1994; 39:61-9

59.

Foiklang S, Wanapat M, Norrapoke T. In vitro rumen fermentation and digestibility of buffaloes as influenced by grape pomace powder and urea treated rice straw supplementation. Anim Sci J. 2016; 87:370-7

60.

Meier JS, Kreuzer M, Marquardt S. Design and methodology of choice feeding experiments with ruminant livestock. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2012; 140:105-20

61.

Jalal H, Giammarco M, Lanzoni L, Akram MZ, Mammi LME, Vignola G, et al. Potential of fruits and vegetable by-products as an alternative feed source for sustainable ruminant nutrition and production: a review. Agriculture. 2023; 13:286

62.

Provenza FD. Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. J Range Manag. 1995; 48:2-17

63.

Baumont R. Palatability and feeding behaviour in ruminants. A review. Ann Zootech. 1996; 45:385-400