RESEARCH ARTICLE

The impact of different diets and genders on fecal microbiota in Hanwoo cattle

Seunghyeun Sim1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1887-5000, Huseong Lee1,2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1931-2007, Sang Yoon1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0062-3745, Hyeonsu Seon1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-0897, Cheolju Park1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2013-8210, Minseok Kim1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8802-5661
Author Information & Copyright
1Division of Animal Science, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
2Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-0845, Japan
*Corresponding author Minseok Kim, Division of Animal Science, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea. Tel: +82-62-530-2128, E-mail: mkim2276@jnu.ac.kr

© Copyright 2022 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jul 29, 2022; Revised: Aug 11, 2022; Accepted: Aug 25, 2022

Published Online: Sep 30, 2022

Abstract

Bovine fecal microbiota is important for host health and its composition can be affected by various factors, such as diet, age, species, breed, regions, and environments. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of diet and gender on fecal microbiota in Korean native Hanwoo cattle. The 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of fecal microbiota was conducted from 44 Hanwoo cattle divided into four groups: (1) 11 heifers fed an oat hay plus total mixed ration (TMR) diet for breeding (HOTB), (2) 11 heifers fed an early fattening TMR diet (HEFT), (3) 11 steers fed the early fattening TMR diet (SEFT), and (4) 11 steers fed the late fattening TMR diet (SLFT). Firmicutes and Bacteroidota were the first and second most dominant phyla in all the samples, respectively. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidota (F/B) ratio associated with feed efficiency was significantly greater in the SLFT group than in the other groups. At the genus level, Romboutsia, Paeniclostridium, and Turicibacterwere the most abundant in the SLFT while Akkermansia, Bacteroides, and Monoglobus were the most abundant in the HOTB group. Although the same early fattening TMR diet was fed to Hanwoo heifers and steers, Marvinbryantia and Coprococcus were the most abundant in the HEFT group while Alistipes and Ruminococcus were the most abundant in the SEFT group. Shannon and Simpson diversity indices were significantly lower in the SLFT group than in the other groups. Distribution of fecal microbiota and functional genetic profiles were significantly different among the four treatment groups. The present study demonstrates that different diets and genders can affect fecal microbiota and the F/B ratio may be associated with feed efficiency in Hanwoo cattle. Our results may help develop strategies to improve gut health and productivity through manipulation of fecal microbiota using the appropriate diet considering Hanwoo cattle gender.

Keywords: 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing; Diet; Fecal microbiota; Gender; Hanwoo

INTRODUCTION

Hanwoo cattle is the most dominant breed in Korea and has been genetically selected and improved as beef cattle with a high marbling content [1]. In the first quarter of 2022, the population of Hanwoo cattle was 3.34 million, which represented > 90% of all beef cattle raised in Korea. Hanwoo cattle are fed based on one of two feeding systems: separate feeding and total mixed ration (TMR) feeding. Since TMR feeding has advantages such as accuracy, convenience, and less feed selection, the use of the TMR feeding system has gradually increased and accounts for more than 20% of all Hanwoo farms in Korea [2].

Diverse microbiota is harbored in the gastrointestinal tract and contributes to nutrient digestion though fermentation. Therefore, gastrointestinal microbiota is important for the health of the host [3]. Cattle fecal microbiota is well known as one of the important factors affecting the health, productivity, and well-being of the host [35]. The 16S rRNA-gene based next generation sequencing analysis has been applied to investigate the fecal microbiota composition in cattle. Initially, pyrosequencing on the Roche GS FLX was used to evaluate the fecal microbiota composition in cattle fed different diets [69], but the number of sequence reads analyzed in these studies was limited. Recently, the Illumina MiSeq or HiSeq platform, which can produce numerous sequence reads, was applied to investigate the fecal microbiota composition in cattle. Various studies have been conducted to investigate and compare the fecal microbiota composition related to different beef production systems [10], different feed efficiencies [5,11], core microbiota investigations [12], grazing and feedlot cattle comparisons [13], management units in dairy cattle [14], dairy calves [15], and dairy cattle during early lactation [16]. These studies indicated that the fecal microbiota in cattle can be affected by various factors such as diet, age, individuals, breed, regions, and environments.

Hanwoo beef is preferred by consumers in Korea due to its higher marbling content compared to imported beef [1]. The gastrointestinal microbiota in cattle plays an important role in feed digestion, fermentation, and host health [17]. Since the composition of cattle gastrointestinal microbiota can be influenced by breed [18,19], studies on the gastrointestinal microbiota in Hanwoo cattle native to Korea will need to be conducted. Although rumen microbiota in Hanwoo cattle has been analyzed in recent studies [20,21], little research about fecal microbiota has been conducted in this breed. Different diets and genders may also affect the fecal microbiota in cattle [7,18], but there are no data to support these results in Hanwoo cattle. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of different diets and genders on the fecal microbiota composition in Hanwoo steers and heifers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Diets and fecal sampling

A total of 44 cattle, including 22 steers and 22 heifers at the same farm, were used to evaluate the composition of fecal microbiota in Hanwoo cattle fed different diets. Fecal samples were collected by rectal grab from the 44 cattle, which were divided into four groups: (1) 11 heifers fed 45% oat hay plus a 55% TMR diet for breeding (HOTB), which included 8.6% crude protein (CP), 3.3% ether extract (EE), 52.2% neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and 27.2% acid detergent fiber (ADF), on a dry mater (DM) basis; (2) 11 heifers fed the early fattening TMR diet (HEFT), which included 13.4% CP, 5.2% EE, 51.1% NDF, and 25.9% ADF, on a DM basis; (3) 11 steers fed the early fattening TMR diet (SEFT), which included 13.4% CP, 5.2% EE, 51.1% NDF, and 25.9% ADF, on a DM basis, and; (4) 11 steers fed the late fattening TMR diet (SLFT), which included 14.5% CP, 5.2% EE, 50.5% NDF, and 25.3% ADF, on a DM basis. The TMR diet was composed of orchard grass straw and a mixture of corn germ meal, oat hull, oat hull pellets, corn cobs, palm kernels, beet pulp, barley pellets, distiller’s dried grains with solubles, corn gluten feed, lupin, molasses, and supplements. The same early fattening TMR diet was fed to steers and heifers in the SEFT and HEFT groups. Before fecal sampling, all cattle were fed these diets for more than 1 month.

DNA extraction and sequencing

Metagenomic DNA was extracted from the 44 fecal samples using the bead-beating plus column (RBB+C) method [22]. Bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was conducted using the primers 341F (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3’) and 805R (5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3’), and the resulting amplicons were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) at Macrogen (Seoul, Korea) as described previously [20,23].

Metataxonomic analysis and functional genetic profiles

The resultant 16S amplicon sequences were cleaned and analyzed using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME 2, version 2021.8) [24] and MicrobiomeAnalyst [25] software packages. The DADA2 plugin was used to remove adapter and chimeric sequences and conduct quality filtering, denoising, and merging. Microbial diversity and taxonomy were analyzed using the cleaned amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). The ASVs were taxonomically classified against the SILVA taxonomy database (version 138). Alpha diversity indices, such as observed ASVs, Chao1, Shannon’s index, and Simpson’s index, were analyzed based on ASV biological observation matrix (BIOM) tables while the beta diversity of the fecal microbiota among the four treatment groups was analyzed using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrices. Functional genetic profiles were predicted using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States 2 (PICRUSt2), which was used to analyze MetaCyc pathway profiles as described previously [26]. Overall functional genetic profiles of predicted Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthologs were compared among the four treatment groups using principal components analysis (PCA).

Statistical analysis

Taxa and MetaCyc pathway profiles that were differentially abundant among the four treatment groups were analyzed using the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) (LDA score > 3) [27].

The Firmicutes/Bacteroidota (F/B) ratio and alpha diversity indices were compared among the four treatment groups using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s test in the XLSTAT statistical software package (version 2022.3.1) (Addinsoft, New York, NY, USA). Beta diversity analysis and functional genetic profiles were compared among the four treatment groups using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) with PAST3 with 9999 random permutations [28].

RESULTS

Data summary

A total of 2,118,514 cleaned sequences were obtained from the 44 fecal samples, including 22 steer and 22 heifer samples. Each sample was represented by > 40,000 cleaned sequences. Good’s coverage was more than 99.8% for all fecal samples. Taxa accounting for at least 0.5% of all sequences across all 44 fecal samples were regarded as “major taxa” and used for further analysis. Firmicutes was the most dominant phylum and accounted for 75.2% of all sequences, while Bacteroidota was the second most dominant and accounted for 19.1% of all sequences (Fig. 1). Verrucomicrobiota was represented by 2.0% of the total sequences, followed by Actinobacteriota (1.1%) and Patescibacteria (1.0%) (Fig. 1). The remaining phyla accounted for < 0.5% of all sequences. At the genus level, Romboutsia was the most dominant and accounted for 5.7% of all sequences across all 44 samples, followed by Paeniclostridium (5.6%), Bacteroides (3.3%), Monoglobus (3.2%), Alistipes (2.2%), Akkermansia (2.0%), (1.1%), Acetitomaculum (1.0%), Ruminococcus (0.9%), Lactobacillus (0.9%), Marvinbryantia (0.7%), Coprococcus (0.5%), and Blautia (0.5%) (Fig. 2). The remaining genera accounted for < 0.5% of all sequences.

jast-64-5-897-g1
Fig. 1. Profiles of fecal microbiota at the phylum level in Hanwoo heifers and steers. The relative abundance of major phyla in 44 Hanwoo cattle are shown. Phyla accounting for < 0.5% of all sequences across all 44 fecal samples are plotted as “Others”. HOTB, heifers fed oat hay plus the total mixed ration (TMR) diet for breeding; HEFT, heifers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SEFT, steers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SLFT, steers fed the late fattening TMR diet.
Download Original Figure
jast-64-5-897-g2
Fig. 2. Profiles of fecal microbiota at the genus level in Hanwoo heifers and steers. The relative abundance of major genera in 44 Hanwoo cattle are shown. Genera accounting for < 0.5% of all sequences across all 44 fecal samples are plotted as “Others”. HOTB, heifers fed oat hay plus the total mixed ration (TMR) diet for breeding; HEFT, heifers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SEFT, steers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SLFT, steers fed late fattening TMR diet.
Download Original Figure
Fecal microbiota composition

At the phylum level, LEfSe analysis indicated that Firmicutes and Actinobacteria were more abundant in the SLFT group than in the other groups, while Bacteroidota was more abundant in the SEFT group than in the other groups (Fig. 3). The F/B ratio was more abundant in the SLFT group than in the other groups (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4). Verrucomicrobiota were more abundant in the HOTB group than in the other groups, while Patescibacteria were more abundant in the HEFT group than in the other groups (Fig. 3).

jast-64-5-897-g3
Fig. 3. Differentially abundant phyla among the four treatment groups. Major phyla that were differentially abundant among the four treatment groups were analyzed using the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) (LDA score > 3). HEFT, heifers fed the early fattening total mixed ration (TMR) diet; HOTB, heifers fed oat hay plus the TMR diet for breeding; SEFT, steers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SLFT, steers fed the late fattening TMR diet.
Download Original Figure
jast-64-5-897-g4
Fig. 4. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidota (F/B) ratio. The F/B ratio was compared among the four treatment groups using the ANOVA with Tukey’s test. HOTB, heifers fed oat hay plus the total mixed ration (TMR) diet for breeding; HEFT, heifers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SEFT, steers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SLFT, steers fed the late fattening TMR diet.
Download Original Figure

At the genus level, LEfSe analysis showed that Romboutsia, Paeniclostridium, and Turicibacter were more abundant in the SLFT group than in the other groups, while Akkermansia, Bacteroides, and Monoglobus were more abundant in the HOTB group than in the other groups (Fig. 5). Lactobacillus, Acetitomaculum, Blautia, Marvinbryantia, and Coprococcus were more abundant in the HEFT group than in the other groups (Fig. 5). In addition, Alistipes and Ruminococcus were more abundant in the SEFT group than in the other groups (Fig. 5).

jast-64-5-897-g5
Fig. 5. Differentially abundant genera among the four treatment groups. Major genera that were differentially abundant among the four treatment groups were analyzed using the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) (LDA score > 3). HEFT, heifers fed the early fattening total mixed ration (TMR) diet; HOTB, heifers fed oat hay plus the TMR diet for breeding; SEFT, steers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SLFT, steers fed the late fattening TMR diet.
Download Original Figure
Alpha and beta diversity analysis

The observed ASV and Chao1 indices did not differ (p > 0.05) among the four treatment groups (Figs. 6A and 6B), whereas Shannon and Simpson diversity indices were lower (p < 0.05) in the SLFT group than in the other groups (Figs. 6C and 6B). Beta diversity analysis based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrices showed that overall fecal microbiota differed (p < 0.05) not only among the four treatment groups, but also between different gender groups (Fig. 7).

jast-64-5-897-g6
Fig. 6. Alpha diversity indices in the four treatment groups. Alpha diversity indices were compared among the four treatment groups using the ANOVA with Tukey’s test. A) Number of observed amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) (p = 0.99), B) Chao1 index (p = 0.99), C) Shannon index (p < 0.001), D) Simpson index (p < 0.0001). HOTB, heifers fed oat hay plus the total mixed ration (TMR) diet for breeding; HEFT, heifers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SEFT, steers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SLFT, steers fed the late fattening TMR diet.
Download Original Figure
jast-64-5-897-g7
Fig. 7. Principal coordinate analysis based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrices showing dissimilarity among the four treatment groups. HOTB, heifers fed oat hay plus the total mixed ration (TMR) diet for breeding; HEFT, heifers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SEFT, steers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SLFT, steers fed the late fattening TMR diet.
Download Original Figure
Functional genetic profiles

The PCA plot revealed that the distribution of functional genetic profiles differed (p < 0.05) among the four treatment groups based on PERMANOVA (Fig. 8). LEfSe analysis indicated that the MetaCyc pathways related to glycolysis (PWY_5484 and GLYCOLYSIS) and homolactic fermentation (ANAEROFRUCAT_PWY) were more predominant in the SLFT group than in the other groups, while the MetaCyc pathways related to peptidoglycan maturation (PWY0_1586) were more predominant in the HTEF group than in the other groups (Fig. 9). In addition, the MetaCyc pathway related to urate biosynthesis/inosine 5’-phosphate degradation (PWY_5695) was more predominant in the SEFT group than in the other groups (Fig. 9).

jast-64-5-897-g8
Fig. 8. Principal component analysis showing overall functional genetic profiles of predicted Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) among the four treatment groups. HOTB, heifers fed oat hay plus the total mixed ration (TMR) diet for breeding; HEFT, heifers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SEFT, steers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SLFT, steers fed the late fattening TMR diet; PC, principal component.
Download Original Figure
jast-64-5-897-g9
Fig. 9. Differentially abundant MetaCyc pathway profiles among the four treatment groups. MetaCyc pathway profiles that were differentially abundant among the four treatment groups were analyzed using the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) (LDA score > 3). HEFT, heifers fed the early fattening and total mixed ration (TMR) diet; SEFT, steers fed the early fattening TMR diet; SLFT, steers fed the late fattening TMR diet.
Download Original Figure

DISCUSSION

Fecal microbiota influences the productivity, health, and well-being of cattle [4,7]. Previous studies revealed that rumen microbiota can be affected by various factors, such as diets, hosts, breeds, geographic regions, and seasons [18,19]. The fecal microbiota of cattle can also be affected by these factors, particularly diet [7]. However, to date, there has been no study to evaluate the impact of different diets on fecal microbiota in Korean native Hanwoo steers and heifers. Thus, we investigated the impact of different diets on the composition of fecal microbiota in Hanwoo steers and heifers at the same farm. We also examined the impact of different genders on the fecal microbiota composition in Hanwoo steers and heifers fed the same diet at the same farm.

Different diets seem to affect the composition of the fecal microbiota in both Hanwoo steers and heifers based on beta diversity analysis. Previous studies showed that both rumen and fecal microbiota were greatly affected by different diets [7,18]. In the Hanwoo heifers in this study, the high forage contained in the diet for breeding may result in changes in the fecal microbiota composition compared to the that of heifers fed the early fattening diet. In Hanwoo steers, the slightly higher concentrate contained in the late fattening diet may contribute to shifts in the fecal microbiota composition compared to that of steers fed the early fattening diet. Otherwise, since the feed ingredients and chemical composition were not very different between the early and late fattening diets, the different cattle ages may have influenced differences in the fecal microbiota composition. In addition, different genders seem to influence the composition of the fecal microbiota in Hanwoo cattle, as shown in the rumen [18]. Although the same early fattening TMR diet was fed to steers and heifers at the same farm, the overall microbial composition was distinct between steers and heifers based on beta diversity analysis. This microbial difference seems to result from different genders in Hanwoo cattle.

The F/B ratio in the rumen is positively correlated with the average daily gain in ruminants [29]. The present study showed that the F/B ratio in the feces was the greatest in late fattening steers. Since steers have a greater average daily gain compared to heifers [30], a greater F/B ratio in the feces of Hanwoo steers at the late fattening stage may be associated with a high feed efficiency, as shown in the rumen. This may be due to differences in host genetics between steers and heifers. Thus, host genetics and fecal microbiota may jointly contribute to feed efficiency in cattle [31]. Further studies are required to examine host genetics and fecal microbiota affecting feed efficiency.

Paeniclostridium and Romboutsia utilize various organic substrates [32,33] and both genera were dominant and more abundant in the feces of Angus cattle fed the TMR diet than in grazing cattle [13]. Similarly, both Paeniclostridium and Romboutsia were dominant in Hanwoo steers fed the TMR diet, particularly in the late fattening Hanwoo steers. In late fattening steers fed a high grain diet, undigested carbohydrates in the large intestine may be increased and may lead to an increase in Paeniclostridium and Romboutsia utilizing various organic substrates. Otherwise, the older age of the late fattening steers may affect the fecal microbiota composition. Interestingly, heifers had a lower Paeniclostridium abundance in the feces, although the same early fattening TMR diet was fed to both steers and heifers, thus indicating that different genders may affect the abundance of Paeniclostridium. Akkermansia was typically found in bovine feces and was abundant in cattle fed a high forage diet, resulting in the degradation of the mucus layer, as described in previous studies [7,13,34]. Previous studies indicated that the abundance of Bacteroides was low in cattle fed a low forage diet [7]. However, Bacteroides was abundant in Hanwoo heifers fed the high forage diet for breeding, indicating that the fecal microbiota may be influenced by different breeds or environments. Monoglobus can ferment pectins [35] and the high abundance of Monoglobus in Hanwoo heifers fed a high forage diet for breeding may be due to pectins contained in the undigested forage in the large intestine. Alistipes is a core genus that is commonly found in the feces of cattle, but its function requires further investigation [7,16,36]. Previous studies showed that Turicibacter is more abundant in cattle with a high feed efficiency [11,37]. Since steers have a greater average daily gain compared to heifers, the abundance of Turicibacter is thought to be the greatest in Hanwoo steers fed a late fattening diet in the present study. Acetate-producing Acetitomaculum, which can utilize formate and glucose, was isolated from bovine rumen [38], and may also be present in the feces of cattle. However, further studies must be conducted to verify this assumption. Lactobacillus and Blautia have probiotic characteristics [39] and were more abundant in Hanwoo heifers than in Hanwoo steers, and thus may be affected by different genders. Blautia is less abundant in cattle fed a high forage diet compared to cattle fed a high grain diet [7]. Similarly, the abundance of Blautia was lower in heifers fed a high forage diet for breeding than in those fed the late fattening diet including high concentrate. Marvinbryantia, which is present in the human gut and has the ability to degrade cellulose [40], was also found in the feces of cattle [41]. Since Marvinbryantia is more abundant in early fattening heifers than in early fattening steers, this genus may be affected by gender. A previous study showed that the abundance of Coprococcus was low in heifers fed a high forage diet [7]. However, in the present study, the abundance of Coprococcus was high in Hanwoo heifers fed a high forage diet. Because Coprococcus does not seem to be affected by the ratio of forage and concentrate, it may be influenced by different breeds or environments.

Hao et al. [42] compared differences in rumen microbiota composition based on age and found that older cattle had low alpha diversity indices. In the present study, low Shannon and Simpson diversity indices were the lowest in the feces of Hanwoo steers at the late fattening stage, indicating that alpha diversity may be affected by age, as shown in the rumen. Further studies will need to be conducted to identify the association between age and fecal microbiota in cattle.

The increase in the functional genetic profiles related to glycolysis in steers fed the late fattening TMR diet may be associated with the F/B ratio increase. In addition, the increase in the F/B ratio may be attributed to increased glycolysis and fermentation by various bacteria in the Firmicutes phylum. Since Paeniclostridium, Romboutsia, and Turicibacter belong to the Firmicutes phylum, a higher abundance of these genera in steers fed the late fattening TMR diet may contribute to the F/B ratio increase, which is positively correlated with the average daily gain [29]. This is supported by the association between Turicibacter and a high feed efficiency [11,37]. The increase in many minor bacterial species within Firmicutes may also contribute to the F/B ratio increase. In addition, the increases in the functional genetic profiles related to homolactic fermentation in steers fed the late fattening TMR diet may be associated with an increase in lactic acid-producing bacteria undergoing homolactic fermentation. Since homolactic bacteria, such as Pediococcus, Streptococcus, Lactococcus, Enterococcus, and Lactobacillus, belong to the Firmicutes phylum [43], the increase in homolactic bacteria may also contribute to the F/B ratio increase in steers fed the late fattening TMR diet. Further studies will need to be conducted to confirm associations between the F/B ratio and bovine fecal bacteria, including lactic acid-producing bacteria.

The results of this study suggest that fecal microbiota is affected by different diets and genders in Hanwoo cattle. The F/B ratio associated with high feed efficiency was greater in steers than in heifers, while bacterial diversity seemed to be affected by a high concentrate diet. The increase in MetaCyc pathways related to glycolysis and homolactic fermentation may be associated with the F/B ratio increase. In future studies, the use of an appropriate diet considering gender may be important to maintain bovine gut health. In addition, further studies should be performed to determine if increasing the F/B ratio in the fecal microbiome can be used as a potential strategy to improve the feed efficiency of Hanwoo cattle.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This study was financially supported by Chonnam National University (Grant number: 2020-0359). And also this work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (No. NRF-2020R1A2C1011188).

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Kim M.

Data curation: Sim S, Kim M.

Formal analysis: Sim S, Lee H, Yoon S, Seon H, Park C.

Methodology: Sim S, Lee H, Yoon S, Seon H, Park C.

Software: Sim S.

Validation: Kim M.

Investigation: Kim M.

Writing - original draft: Sim S, Lee H, Kim M.

Writing - review & editing: Sim S, Lee H, Yoon S, Seon H, Park C, Kim M.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chonnam National University, Korea (CNU IACUC-YB-2020-6).

REFERENCES

1.

Lee SH, Park BH, Sharma A, Dang CG, Lee SS, Choi TJ, et al. Hanwoo cattle: origin, domestication, breeding strategies and genomic selection. J Anim Sci Technol. 2014; 56:2

2.

Bharanidharan R, Lee CH, Thirugnanasambantham K, Ibidhi R, Woo YW, Lee HG, et al. Feeding systems and host breeds influence ruminal fermentation, methane production, microbial diversity and metagenomic gene abundance. Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:701081

3.

Wells JE, Kim M, Bono JL, Kuehn LA, Benson AK. Meat Science and Muscle Biology Symposium: Escherichia coli O157:H7, diet, and fecal microbiome in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2014; 92:1345-55

4.

Kim M, Wells JE. A meta-analysis of bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle. Curr Microbiol. 2016; 72:145-51

5.

Welch CB, Lourenco JM, Krause TR, Seidel DS, Fluharty FL, Pringle TD, et al. Evaluation of the fecal bcterial communities of Angus steers with divergent feed efficiencies across the lifespan from weaning to slaughter. Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:597405

6.

Callaway TR, Dowd SE, Edrington TS, Anderson RC, Krueger N, Bauer N, et al. Evaluation of bacterial diversity in the rumen and feces of cattle fed different levels of dried distillers grains plus solubles using bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing. J Anim Sci. 2010; 88:3977-83

7.

Kim M, Kim J, Kuehn LA, Bono JL, Berry ED, Kalchayanand N, et al. Investigation of bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle fed different diets. J Anim Sci. 2014; 92:683-94

8.

Rice WC, Galyean ML, Cox SB, Dowd SE, Cole NA. Influence of wet distillers grains diets on beef cattle fecal bacterial community structure. BMC Microbiol. 2012; 12:25

9.

Shanks OC, Kelty CA, Archibeque S, Jenkins M, Newton RJ, McLellan SL, et al. Community structures of fecal bacteria in cattle from different animal feeding operations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77:2992-3001

10.

Corrêa PS, Jimenez CR, Mendes LW, Rymer C, Ray P, Gerdes L, et al. Taxonomy and functional diversity in the fecal microbiome of beef cattle reared in Brazilian traditional and semi-intensive production systems. Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:768480

11.

Lourenco JM, Welch CB, Krause TR, Wieczorek MA, Fluharty FL, Rothrock MJ, et al. Fecal microbiome differences in Angus steers with differing feed efficiencies during the feedlot-finishing phase. Microorganisms. 2022; 10:1128

12.

Hagey JV, Bhatnagar S, Heguy JM, Karle BM, Price PL, Meyer D, et al. Fecal microbial communities in a large representative cohort of California dairy cows. Front Microbiol. 2019; 10:1093

13.

Zhang Z, Yang L, He Y, Luo X, Zhao S, Jia X. Composition of fecal microbiota in grazing and feedlot Angus beef cattle. Animals. 2021; 11:3167

14.

Zhao L, Li X, Atwill ER, Aly SS, Williams DR, Su Z. Dynamic changes in fecal bacterial microbiota of dairy cattle across the production line. BMC Microbiol. 2022; 22:132

15.

Slanzon GS, Ridenhour BJ, Moore DA, Sischo WM, Parrish LM, Trombetta SC, et al. Fecal microbiome profiles of neonatal dairy calves with varying severities of gastrointestinal disease. PLOS ONE. 2022; 17e0262317

16.

Huang S, Ji S, Wang F, Huang J, Alugongo GM, Li S. Dynamic changes of the fecal bacterial community in dairy cows during early lactation. AMB Express. 2020; 10:167

17.

Kim M, Park T, Yu Z. Metagenomic investigation of gastrointestinal microbiome in cattle. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017; 30:1515-28

18.

Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, Global Rumen Census Collaborators, et al. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:14567

19.

Kim M, Morrison M, Yu Z. Status of the phylogenetic diversity census of ruminal microbiomes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011; 76:49-63

20.

Baek YC, Choi H, Jeong JY, Lee SD, Kim MJ, Lee S, et al. The impact of short-term acute heat stress on the rumen microbiome of Hanwoo steers. J Anim Sci Technol. 2020; 62:208-17

21.

Kim M, Park T, Jeong JY, Baek Y, Lee HJ. Association between rumen microbiota and marbling score in Korean native beef cattle. Animals. 2020; 10:712

22.

Yu Z, Morrison M. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques. 2004; 36:808-12

23.

Hong SW, Park J, Jeong H, Kim M. Evaluation of the microbiome composition in particulate matter inside and outside of pig houses. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021; 63:640-50

24.

Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019; 37:852-7

25.

Dhariwal A, Chong J, Habib S, King IL, Agellon LB, Xia J. MicrobiomeAnalyst: a web-based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45:W180-8

26.

Kim M, Park T, Yun JI, Lim HW, Han NR, Lee ST. Investigation of age-related changes in the skin microbiota of Korean women. Microorganisms. 2020; 8:1581

27.

Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011; 12:R60

28.

Hammer Ø, Harper DA, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electronica. 2001; 4:9

29.

Min BR, Gurung N, Shange R, Solaiman S. Potential role of rumen microbiota in altering average daily gain and feed efficiency in meat goats fed simple and mixed pastures using bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing. J Anim Sci. 2019; 97:3523-34

30.

Zinn RA, Barreras A, Owens FN, Plascencia A. Performance by feedlot steers and heifers: daily gain, mature body weight, dry matter intake, and dietary energetics. J Anim Sci. 2008; 86:2680-9

31.

Wen C, Yan W, Mai C, Duan Z, Zheng J, Sun C, et al. Joint contributions of the gut microbiota and host genetics to feed efficiency in chickens. Microbiome. 2021; 9:126

32.

Sasi Jyothsna TS, Tushar L, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Paraclostridium benzoelyticum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment and reclassification of Clostridium bifermentans as Paraclostridium bifermentans comb. nov. Proposal of a new genus Paeniclostridium gen. nov. to accommodate Clostridium sordellii and Clostridium ghonii. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016; 66:1268-74

33.

Gerritsen J, Fuentes S, Grievink W, van Niftrik L, Tindall BJ, Timmerman HM, et al. Characterization of Romboutsia ilealis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from the gastro-intestinal tract of a rat, and proposal for the reclassification of five closely related members of the genus Clostridium into the genera Romboutsia gen. nov., Intestinibacter gen. nov., Terrisporobacter gen. nov. and Asaccharospora gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014; 64:1600-16

34.

Derrien M, Vaughan EE, Plugge CM, de Vos WM. Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004; 54:1469-76

35.

Kim CC, Kelly WJ, Patchett ML, Tannock GW, Jordens Z, Stoklosinski HM, et al. Monoglobus pectinilyticus gen. nov., sp. nov., a pectinolytic bacterium isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017; 67:4992-8

36.

Dowd SE, Callaway TR, Wolcott RD, Sun Y, McKeehan T, Hagevoort RG, et al. Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). BMC Microbiol. 2008; 8:125

37.

Myer PR, Wells JE, Smith TPL, Kuehn LA, Freetly HC. Cecum microbial communities from steers differing in feed efficiency. J Anim Sci. 2015; 93:5327-40

38.

Greening RC, Leedle JAZ. Enrichment and isolation of Acetitomaculum ruminis, gen. nov., sp. nov.: acetogenic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Arch Microbiol. 1989; 151:399-406

39.

Liu X, Mao B, Gu J, Wu J, Cui S, Wang G, et al. Blautia—a new functional genus with potential probiotic properties?. Gut Microbes. 2021; 13:1875796

40.

Wolin MJ, Miller TL, Collins MD, Lawson PA. Formate-dependent growth and homoacetogenic fermentation by a bacterium from human feces: description of Bryantella formatexigens gen. nov., sp. nov. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69:6321-6

41.

Li Y, Ma N, Ren L, Wang M, Hu L, Shen Y, et al. Microbiome-metabolome responses in ruminal content and feces of lactating dairy cows with N-carbamylglutamate supplementation under heat stress. Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:902001

42.

Hao Y, Gong Y, Huang S, Ji S, Wang W, Wang Y, et al. Effects of age, diet CP, NDF, EE, and starch on the rumen bacteria community and function in dairy cattle. Microorganisms. 2021; 9:1788

43.

Pessione E. Lactic acid bacteria contribution to gut microbiota complexity: lights and shadows. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012; 2:86