Table 6. Effect of multi-protease in the diet on ileum digestibility co-efficient of broiler chickens1),2)

PC PC-150 NC NC-150 NC-300 ENC ENC-150 ENC-300 SEM p-value
Crude protein (%) - - −0.5 −0.5 −0.5 −1.0 −1.0 −1.0
Amino acid3) (%) - - −2.0 −2.0 −2.0 −4.0 −4.0 −4.0
Day 21
 Dry matter 0.79ab 0.80a 0.78bc 0.80abc 0.81ab 0.77c 0.78bc 0.79bc 0.002 < 0.001
 Crude protein 0.70bc 0.73a 0.67de 0.70bc 0.71ab 0.66e 0.68cde 0.69bcd 0.003 < 0.001
 Energy 0.79ab 0.80a 0.78b 0.79ab 0.79ab 0.77b 0.77b 0.78ab 0.003 0.030
Day 35
 Dry matter 0.81bc 0.82a 0.80cd 0.81ab 0.81a 0.80d 0.80cd 0.81bc 0.001 0.005
 Crude protein 0.81b 0.82a 0.79bc 0.80bc 0.81b 0.78c 0.79bc 0.79c 0.002 < 0.001
 Energy 0.80ab 0.81a 0.79bc 0.80ab 0.80ab 0.78c 0.78c 0.79bc 0.002 0.002
The eight dietary treatments were: positive control (PC), negative control (NC: minus 0.5% from PC, and minus 2% of lysine, methionine, threonine and methionine plus cysteine), extreme negative control (ENC: minus 1% from PC, minus 4% of lysine, methionine, threonine and methionine plus cysteine), and plus multi-protease 150 or 300 g per ton (e. g., PC-150); PC, PC-150, NC, NC-150, NC-300, ENC, ENC-150, ENC-300.
Values are the mean of eight replicates per treatment.
List of amino acids: lysine, methionine, threonine and methionine + cysteine.
Means with different superscripts in the same row were significantly different (Turkey’s multiple range test, p < 0.05).