Table 3. Effects of dietary protease on ileal morphology of weaned pigs1)
Item | Dietary treatments | SEM | p-value2) |
PC | NC | PR | Diet | PC vs. NC | PC vs. PR | NC vs. PR |
Villus height (μm) | 312.52 | 282.70 | 318.23 | 11.69 | 0.110 | 0.097 | 0.736 | 0.053 |
Crypt depth (μm) | 102.32 | 99.15 | 88.48 | 5.37 | 0.204 | 0.684 | 0.094 | 0.186 |
VH : CD | 3.11 | 2.87 | 3.67 | 0.24 | 0.099 | 0.507 | 0.130 | 0.040 |
Villus width (μm) | 101.72 | 93.59 | 98.82 | 4.23 | 0.414 | 0.200 | 0.649 | 0.391 |
Villus area (μm2) | 24,938 | 23,536 | 23,815 | 2,064 | 0.880 | 0.640 | 0.707 | 0.925 |
Each value is the mean of 5 replicates (5 pigs/pen).
Diet, main diet effect; PC vs. NC, effect between positive and negative controls; PC vs. PR, effect between positive control and negative control + 0.02% dietary protease; NC vs. PR, effect between negative control and negative control + 0.02% dietary protease.
PC, positive control with required level of protein; NC, negative control with low level of protein; PR, negative control + 0.02% dietary protease; VH, villus height; CD, crypt depth; SEM, standard error of means.