Table 1. Growth performance comparisons among treatment groups based on their average relative percent weight

DPI1)	Control2)		Group 13)		Group 24)		Group 35)		p-value
	Average	Standard error	Average	Standard error	Average	Standard error	Average	Standard error
0	100a	0.00	100a	0.00	100a	0.00	100a	0.00
1	100.75b	0.42	102.62ab	0.68	103.45a	0.50	101.50b	0.18	0.004
2	101.55b	0.42	105.07a	1.14	106.85a	1.01	105.23a	0.43	0.0016
3	91.32b	0.41	94.03ab	0.72	94.42a	1.29	92.72ab	0.15	0.0402
4	90.50a	0.70	91.93a	0.84	91.85a	1.52	90.15a	0.78	0.4999
5	96.88a	1.00	98.53a	0.91	98.27a	1.53	94.90a	0.57	0.0924
6	100.15b	0.17	103.05a	0.77	102.83a	0.72	99.75b	0.28	0.0014
7	102.98b	0.25	105.70a	0.72	105.65a	0.83	102.28b	0.39	0.0022
8	103.18b	0.63	107.93a	1.13	107.53a	1.41	102.70b	0.50	0.0036
9	105.40a	0.68	109.83a	1.77	109.80a	1.56	106.50a	1.74	0.1303
10	108.15ab	0.62	112.10a	1.62	111.10ab	1.45	106.68b	0.50	0.0207
11	107.25ab	0.66	122.53a	1.51	111.00ab	1.89	106.43b	0.58	0.0159
12	109.18b	0.55	114.85a	1.81	114.60ab	1.62	109.48ab	0.78	0.0114

Average values in the same row with different superscripts are statistically different.
DPI, days post inoculation.
Control, group without any treatment.
Group 1, treated with synbiotic based on Pediococcus acidilactici GB-U15.
Group 2, treated with synbiotic based on Lactobacillus plantarum GB-U17.
Group 3, treated with synbiotic based on Lactobacillus plantarum GB1-3.