Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative effects of proteases on performance, carcass traits and gut structure of broilers fed diets reduced in protein and amino acids

Alexandra L. Wealleans1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1102-1360, Roba Abo Ashour1https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4067-7713, Majdi A. Abu Ishmais2https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2987-1013, Sadiq Al-Amaireh3https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1867-1781, David Gonzalez-Sanchez1,*http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4550-5147
1Kemin Animal Nutrition and Health, Herentals 2200, Belgium
2Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan
3Suliman Al-Amaireh & Partners Co., Tabarbor 11731, Amman, Jordan
*Corresponding author: David Gonzalez-Sanchez, Kemin Animal Nutrition and Health, Herentals 2200, Belgium. Tel: +32-14286200, E-mail: David.gonzalezsanchez@kemin.com

© Copyright 2024 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 13, 2022; Revised: Dec 20, 2022; Accepted: Feb 19, 2023

Published Online: May 31, 2024

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of supplementing different protease enzymes on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and selected carcass traits in broilers fed diets reduced 3.5% in crude protein (CP) and amino acids (AA). One thousand one-day-old Ross 308 broilers (41 g) were assigned to five dietary treatments with ten replicates of 20 birds each: a positive control (PC) diet formulated to meet Ross 308 AA requirements, a negative control (NC) diet reformulated to provide 3.5% lower CP and AA compared to PC, NC supplemented with a multi-protease (PR1) solution, containing 3 different coated proteases produced from Aspergillus niger, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis, NC supplemented with a serine protease (PR2) produced from Bacillus licheniformis, and NC supplemented with an alkaline protease (PR3) produced from Bacillus licheniformis. At slaughter, 40 birds per treatment were used to assess the effect of the different treatments on carcass traits. At 32 days, samples of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum of 10 birds per treatment were collected for intestinal morphology evaluation. Birds fed PC and NC supplemented with multi-protease exhibited better (p < 0.05) feed efficiency compared to NC and NC supplemented with all the other protease enzymes. Multi-protease supplementation was linked to the highest (p < 0.05) carcass weight and yield. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments in all gut segments, with PC, PR1, PR2, and PR3 exhibiting longer villi height (VH) compared to NC. This study demonstrates that 3.5% reduction of CP and AA negatively affected for the overall period feed efficiency, carcass yield, and intestinal morphology. The supplementation of the multi-protease restored feed efficiency and improved carcass yield.

Keywords: Broiler; Protease enzyme; Growth performance; Gut morphology; Carcass trait

INTRODUCTION

With feed cost accounting for 60%–70% of the total cost of poultry production [1], the profitability of broiler production is largely driven by feed cost and by the efficiency of feed conversion. Therefore, increasing the digestibility of diets, and the use of less energy and nutrient-dense formulations without performance penalty, is of prime interest to poultry nutritionists. Crude protein (CP) digestibility is especially important, due also to the impact of excreted N on the environment. Formulating broiler diets with lower CP levels is regarded as a promising strategy to improve the sustainability of chicken meat production [2] and it has shown to improve litter quality and foot pad lesions [3]. Moreover, diets reduced in CP can reduce the amount of undigested CP reaching the hindgut, preventing pathogen proliferation, such as Clostridium perfringens, thus improving flock health status [4]. CP is often indirectly improved by the addition of feed additives such as phytases [57], non-starch polysaccharide (NSP) degrading enzymes [811], and biosurfactants [12,13], but direct improvements in CP and amino acids (AA) utilization are achieved through the application of protease enzymes.

Cowieson and Roos [14] reported an average improvement in AA digestibility of 3.74% following supplementation of poultry and swine diets with a mono-component protease, and further studies have also reported improvements in energy utilization [1517]. Other studies have reported improved gut morphology [15], carcass quality [15,18], environmental impact [19], and alterations to the intestinal microbiome [18,20,21]. The addition of protease, by lowering both CP levels in diets and nitrogen excretion to the environment, can have a substantial impact on the environmental impacts of broiler production, potentially reducing the industry’s Global Warming Potential [22].

However, the reported effects of monocomponent protease supplementation have been inconsistent. In contrast to Cowieson and Roos [14], Lee et al. [23], in a meta-analysis of 67 studies, reported that supplementation of protease to monogastric diets resulted in only a 1.6% average improvement in apparent ileal AA digestibility compared to an unsupplemented control, and that this effect was further reduced or negligible in diets containing phytase and NSP-degrading enzymes. Similarly, Tari et al. [24] suggested that the lack of reported effect of serine protease supplementation on digestibility or performance was due to the high quality and inherent CP digestibility of the basal diet and the presence of NSP-degrading and phytase enzymes.

The efficacy and consistency of protease supplementation may be improved by the simultaneous supplementation of multiple proteases with different pH optima and substrate specificity. Most proteases are degraded by exposure to acid and pepsin in the stomach [25], and therefore have reduced activity in the small intestine. The incorporation of acid-stable proteases in poultry feed could expand the ability of exogenous protease supplementation to work in the upper sections of the intestinal tract, therefore allowing more time for absorption and retention. However, little data is available directly comparing the supplementation of monocomponent and multi-proteases on broiler performance. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of three different exogenous proteases, two monocomponent and one multi-protease, with different pH optima and ranges, on the growth performance, selected carcass traits, and gut morphology of growing broilers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Birds, housing, and experimental diets

A 32-day study was conducted at the Broiler Research Unit of Suliman Al-Amaireh & Partners Co., Jordan. All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with commercial practices and were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) of the Jordan University of Science & Technology (16/04/12/206). All experimental procedures were compliant with all local animal welfare legislation. A total of one thousand one-day-old Ross 308 broilers (41 g at hatch) were sourced from the commercial hatchery of Suliman Al-Amaireh & Partners Co and were feather sexed at hatch. Birds were randomly allocated to five dietary treatments with ten replicates of 20 mixed-sex broilers (10 males and 10 females) each: a positive control (PC) diet formulated to meet Ross 308 AA requirements as per 2019 nutrient specifications [26], a negative control (NC) diet reformulated to provide 3.5% lower CP and AA compared to PC, NC supplemented with 3,000 U/kg (300 mg/kg) of a multi-protease (PR1) solution, containing 3 different coated acidic, neutral and alkaline proteases produced from Aspergillus niger, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis respectively (Kemzyme Protease, Kemin Europa N.V., Herentals, Belgium), NC supplemented with 15,000 U/kg (200 mg/kg) of a commercial serine protease (PR2) produced from Bacillus licheniformis, and NC supplemented with 30,000 U/kg (500 mg/kg) of a commercial alkaline protease (PR3) produced from Bacillus licheniformis. The selection of the proteases evaluated in this trial was based on their commercial relevance and their application dose match the commercial recommendation of their suppliers. Analysis of enzyme recovery was not performed in the present experiment, due to feed spoilage in transit between the trial site and experimental laboratory.

Birds were reared on a solid floor covered with clean wood shavings. The temperature and ventilation of the building were monitored daily and were managed according to the breed recommendations [26]. A regular lighting program (0–3 days 24 h/light, 4–7 days 23 h/light, and 8–final age 20 h/light) was provided by fluorescent bulbs placed above the pens.

Two dietary phases were provided: starter (d 0–14) and grower (d 15–32). All diets were produced according to commercial practices and fed as pellets (2 mm diameter and 3 mm length in starter diet; and 3 mm diameter and 5 mm length in grower diets). Pelleting conditions were acceptable for the heat-stability of all the proteases (< 60°C). All diets contained background phytase, NSP-degrading enzymes, and biosurfactants. The composition of the experimental diets is listed in Table 1. Dry matter, CP, ash, ether extract and crude fiber from experimental feeds were determined with NIRS (NIRS DS2500 F, FOSS, Hillerød, Danmark) and are shown in Table 2. Feed and water were provided ad libitum throughout the study.

Table 1. Ingredients and nutrient composition of the experimental diets
Variable 0–14 days 14–32 days
PC NC1) PC NC
Ingredients (g/kg)
 Corn 547.9 568.2 490.6 512.8
 Soybean meal (46%) 411.3 391.0 354.7 335.2
 Wheat - - 100.0 100.0
 Limestone 12.3 12.4 12.3 12.4
 Soybean oil 7.0 7.0 22.9 20.0
 Monocalcium phosphate 7.6 7.8 6.4 6.6
 Sodium chloride 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.2
 Sodium bicarbonate 1.1 1.1 0.1 0.1
 L-Lysine HCl 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.2
 DL-Methionine 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.9
 L-Threonine 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.9
 Vitamin and mineral premix2) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
 Choline chloride 60% 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
 Coccidiostat 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
 Bio-emulsifier3) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
 NSP enzyme4) 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
 Phytase5) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Calculated nutrient composition (%, as fed basis)
 Dry matter 88.54 88.51 88.78 88.72
 ME (kcal/kg) 2940 2950 3075 3075
 Crude protein 23.80 23.00 21.93 21.18
 Crude fat 3.16 3.20 4.63 4.40
 Crude fibre 2.64 2.62 2.55 2.56
 Digestable lysine 1.28 1.23 1.18 1.14
 Digestable methionine 0.64 0.61 0.58 0.55
 Digestable methionine + cysteine 0.95 0.91 0.87 0.84
 Digestable threonine 0.87 0.83 0.76 0.73
 Digestable arginine 1.50 1.44 1.35 1.30
 Digestable tryptophan 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.23
 Ca 0.87 0.87 0.84 0.84
 Digestable phosphorous 0.40 0.40 0.37 0.37
 Na 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.15
 Cl 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.22

To create the experimental treatments, the different proteases were added at the expense of corn as follows: PR1, 300 g/t (3,000 U/kg, where 1 U of protease activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that releases 1 μg of trichloroacetic acid-soluble azo-casein peptides from a 1% azo-casein substrate solution per minute in the assay at pH 7.5 and at a temperature of 37°C); PR2, 200 g/t (15,000 U/kg, where 1 U of protease activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that releases 1 μmoL of p-nitroaniline from 1 mM substrate (Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNA) per minute at pH 9.0 and temperature 37°C); PR3, 500 g/t (30,000 U/kg, where 1 U of protease activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that liberates 1 micromole of para-nitroaniline (pNA) from the Succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNA (C30H36N6O9) substrate per minute at pH 8.0 and 37°C).

Provided per kilogram diet: retinyl acetate, 3.50 mg; cholecalciferol, 0.1 mg; α-tocopherol acetate, 25 mg; menadione, 3 mg; thiamine, 2.0 mg; riboflavin, 7 mg; pyridoxine, 4.0 mg; cobalamin, 0.020 mg; niacin, 50 mg; calcium pantothenate: 15 mg; Cu (from copper sulphate), 9.0 mg; Fe (from ferrous sulphate), 35 mg; I (from potassium iodate): 1 mg; Mn (from manganese sulphate), 85 mg; Se (from sodium selenite), 0.35 mg; Zn (from zinc oxide), 80 mg.

LYSOFORTE® EXTEND, a proprietary combination of lysolecithin, synthetic emulsifier, and monoglycerides manufactured by Kemin Europa NV, Herentals, Belgium.

Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase 350,000 U/g, Endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase 23,500 U/g, Endo-1,4-beta-glucanase 180,000 U/g, Alpha-amylase 4,000, and Bacillolysin 17,000 U/g; KEMZYME Plus concentrate dry, Kemin Europa NV (Herentals, Belgium).

6-Phytase 10,000 FTU/g. KINGPHOS 10,000 FTU/g. Qingdao Vland Biotech Group (Qingdao, China).

PC, positive control; NC, negative control.

Download Excel Table
Table 2. Determined nutrient composition1) (%, as fed basis) of the experimental diets
PC NC PR1 PR2 PR3
0–14 days
 Dry matter 88.75 89.09 88.96 89.05 88.35
 Crude protein 24.40 23.17 22.95 23.50 23.54
 Crude fat 3.45 3.33 3.30 3.42 3.27
 Ash 5.95 5.52 5.58 5.41 5.35
 Crude fiber 2.61 2.465 2.43 2.60 2.50
14–32 days
 Dry matter 88.29 87.93 88.23 88.3 88.29
 Crude protein 22.35 21.31 21.39 21.44 21.45
 Crude fat 3.97 4.06 4.08 4.15 4.15
 Ash 5.82 5.40 5.52 5.63 5.37
 Crude fiber 2.27 2.26 2.53 2.37 2.39

Determined with NIRS (NIRS DS2500 F, FOSS, Hillerød, Danmark).

PC, positive control; NC, negative control; PR1, NC supplemented with a multi-protease; PR2, NC supplemented with a serine protease; PR3, NC supplemented with an alkaline protease.

Download Excel Table
Growth performance

Birds were weighed individually on arrival from the hatchery. Pen bird body weight (BW), body weight gain (BWG) and feed intake (FI) were recorded at 14, 28 and 32 days. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated by dividing pen FI by pen BWG. Daily mortality was recorded per pen. Final BWG, FI and FCR were calculated on day 32, and all birds were slaughtered.

Carcass traits and meat characteristics

At slaughter, 4 male birds from each replicate with an average BW of 2,050 g, were selected and euthanized for carcass traits evaluation. The male gender selection was decided due to higher and therefore closer BW to the average 2,050 g. Birds were slaughtered as per the Halal method according to Jordanian law. The skin along with the feathers was removed after slaughtering, carcasses were eviscerated by hand and individual carcasses were weighed. The whole breast as well as the abdominal fat were removed from the carcass and weighed individually. Carcass traits were expressed as a percentage of the carcass weight.

Intestinal morphology

At 32 days 1 male bird per pen (a total of 50 birds: 10 birds per treatment) was randomly selected and euthanized and samples of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were collected and fixed in 10% neutralized formalin for three days and sent to the Histopathology lab of The Jordan University of Science and Technology (Irbid, Jordan). The samples were then dehydrated through ascending concentrations of alcohol starting from 60% concentration, 70%, 80%, 90%, and absolute (100%) ethanol. They were transferred to xylene for one hour and then soaked in liquid paraffin and embedded in paraffin using specialized molds. The mold was left to cool down at room temperature. The embedded samples were sectioned at 4–5 μm thickness using a rotary microtome and subsequently were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. They were then examined by a light microscope connected with a camera (Olympus BX51, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Each slide of the three parts of the small intestine was pictured at 40X magnification. The morphometric measurements of each sample, namely villi height (VH), villus width (VW), and crypts depth (CD) were taken using image J software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). Only well-oriented sections were considered for measurements. At least six readings of each slide (total of 11 slides of each intestinal segment) of well-oriented sections were taken and considered for statistical analysis. The ratio of villus height: crypt depth (VH:CD) for each replicate was calculated from the average measurement.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as means with overall SEM and were analyzed in the Fit Model platform of JMP 15 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) with protease supplementation as the main factor. The pen was considered the experimental unit for performance. The individual broiler sampled was considered the experimental unit for carcass traits and histology. No outlier data were identified or excluded from the dataset. In all statistical analyses, differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Growth performance

Mortality was considered low (<5%) and was not different among the different treatments. Performance results per feeding period and overall (0 to 32 days) are shown in Table 3. By day 14, broilers from PR1 and PR2 showed higher (p < 0.05) BW compared to PR3, while no difference (p > 0.05) was found compared to PC and NC. Between days 14 and 28, broiler fed NC diets supplemented or not with any of the protease enzymes (PR1, PR2, PR3, and NC) showed better (p < 0.05) FCR than broilers fed the PC diet. Across the total trial period (0 to 32 days), the best feed efficiency (p < 0.05) was realized when feeding birds with the PC diet and the NC diet supplemented with 300 mg/kg of the multi-protease solution (PR1).

Table 3. Effect of the dietary supplementation of different proteases on the growth performance of broilers in each experimental group measured at different growth stages
PC NC PR1 PR2 PR3 SEM p-value
0–14 days
 BW (day 14) 485ab 493ab 503a 501a 482b 4.5018 0.0056
 BWG (g) 444ab 452ab 462a 460a 441b 4.5018 0.0056
 FI (g) 430 439 440 440 425 6.4400 0.3688
 FCR 0.967 0.972 0.951 0.956 0.963 0.0069 0.2342
14–28 days
 BW (day 28) 1,782 1,779 1,813 1,819 1,788 14.1348 0.1583
 BWG (g) 1,296 1,286 1,310 1,318 1,306 10.2540 0.2356
 F, (g) 1,987 1,937 1,952 1,987 1,952 15.7609 0.0988
 FCR 1.532a 1.506b 1.490b 1.508b 1.495b 0.0058 < 0.0001
0–32 days
 BW (day 32) 2,089 2,103 2,140 2,106 2,072 20.6572 0.2333
 BWG (g) 2,048 2,062 2,099 2,065 2,031 20.6572 0.2333
 FI (g) 2,821 2,938 2,872 2,911 2,886 35.5427 0.2071
 FCR 1.377b 1.425a 1.368b 1.410a 1.420a 0.0062 < 0.0001
 Adjust. FCR (2.1 kg BW) 1.379 1.424 1.359 1.409 1.426 - -

Values with different superscripts in the same row were significantly different (p < 0.05).

PC, positive control diet formulated to meet Ross 308 AA requirements; NC, negative control diet reformulated to 3.5% lower digestible AA compared PC; PR1, NC supplemented with 3,000 U/kg (300 mg/kg) of a multi-protease solution, containing 3 different coated proteases produced from Aspergillus niger, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis; PR2, NC supplemented with 15,000 U/kg (200 mg/kg) of a serine protease produced from Bacillus licheniformis; PR3, NC supplemented with 30,000 U/kg (500 mg/kg) of an alkaline protease produced from Bacillus licheniformis; SEM, n = 10 replicates per treatment (20 birds per replicate); BW, body weight; BWG, body weight gain; FI, feed intake; FCR,feed conversion ratio; Adjust. FCR (2.1 kg BW), Adjusted FCR at 2.1 kg of final BW calculated according to Ross Broiler Management Handbook 2014.

Download Excel Table
Intestinal morphology

The morphometric changes in the duodenal, jejunal, and ileal villi of birds from the different dietary treatments at 32 days are presented in Table 4. There were significant differences between treatments in all gut segments. Briefly:

  • Duodenum: VH was longer (p < 0.05) for PR3 compared to PR2, NC, and PC. VW was higher (p < 0.05) for PR3 and PC compared to all other treatments. CD was longer (p < 0.05) for PR3 compared to all other treatments. VH:CD was higher (p < 0.05) for PR2 compared to PC and PR3.

  • Jejunum: VH was longer (p < 0.05) for PR3 compared to all other treatments. VW was higher (p < 0.05) for PC compared to NC. CD was longer (p < 0.05) for PR3 compared to all other treatments. VH:CD was higher (p < 0.05) for PC and PR2 compared to NC and PR3, whilst VH:CD for PR1 was higher (p < 0.05) than PR3.

  • Ileum: VH was longer (p < 0.05) for PC compared to NC. VW was longer (p < 0.05) for PC compared to PR1 and PR2. CD was longer (p < 0.05) for PR3 compared to PC, PR1, and PR2. VH:CD was higher (p < 0.05) for PC compared to all other treatments. VH:CD was higher (p < 0.05) for PR2 compared to NC.

Table 4. Effect of dietary supplementation of the different proteases on the intestinal morphology of broilers in each experimental group at 32 days of age
PC NC PR1 PR2 PR3 SEM p-value
Duodenum
 Villus height 226.37cd 223.61d 280.05ab 259.88bc 299.56a 7.8988 < 0.0001
 Villus width 32.02a 25.55b 26.24b 26.31b 32.22a 1.1154 < 0.0001
 Crypt depth 26.74b 25.44b 29.18b 28.94b 36.86a 1.1979 < 0.0001
 VH:CD 9.01b 9.06ab 9.75ab 10.66a 9.01b 0.4230 0.0173
Jejunum
 Villus height 187.83bc 163.84c 200.13b 191.17bc 230.68a 7.5963 < 0.0001
 Villus width 35.26a 27.33b 28.25ab 28.87ab 28.64ab 1.8999 0.0603
 Crypt depth 22.52b 23.68b 25.39b 21.76b 35.11a 0.9437 < 0.0001
 VH:CD 8.74a 7.34bc 8.50ab 9.28a 6.62c 0.3570 < 0.0001
Ileum
 Villus height 182.40a 147.53b 160.28ab 158.52ab 162.56ab 6.0764 0.0059
 Villus width 38.32a 35.50ab 30.81bc 28.58c 31.79abc 1.5900 0.0004
 Crypt depth 21.11b 25.92ab 22.88b 22.63b 31.48a 1.5513 < 0.0001
 VH:CD 9.47a 5.82c 7.16bc 7.52b 6.22bc 0.3800 < 0.0001

Values with different superscripts in the same row were significantly different (p < 0.05).

PC, positive control diet formulated to meet Ross 308 AA requirements; NC, negative control diet reformulated to 3.5% lower AA compared PC; PR1, NC supplemented with 3,000 U/kg (300 mg/kg) of a multi-protease solution, containing 3 different coated proteases produced from Aspergillus niger, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis; PR2, NC supplemented with 15,000 U/kg (200 mg/kg) of a serine protease produced from Bacillus licheniformis; PR3, NC supplemented with 30,000 U/kg (500 mg/kg) of an alkaline protease produced from Bacillus licheniformis. SEM, n = 10 replicates per treatment (1 male bird per replicate). VH:CD, villus height to crypt depth ratio.

Download Excel Table
Selected carcass traits

Table 3 presents the effect of dietary supplementation of the different proteases on the selected carcass traits of male broilers at 32 days of age. Carcass weight as well as carcass yield was higher (p < 0.05) for PR1 treatment compared to all other treatments, and was higher (p < 0.05) for PR2 compared to NC and PR3. Breast weight was higher (p < 0.05) for PR1 and PR2 compared to NC and PR3. Breast % was higher (p < 0.05) for PR2 compared to NC and PR1. No effects (p > 0.05) were detected for the rest of the carcass traits evaluated.

DISCUSSION

Growth performance

Broiler growth performance is largely influenced by the supply of high levels of digestible AA [2729] and several previous studies have shown growth performance impairment following their dietary reduction [3034]. However, meeting these requirements involves formulating diets with highly digestible proteinaceous, and very often expensive, feed ingredients. Keeping the balance between broiler growth performance and production profitability is not an easy task for the modern poultry industry, and the sustained rise of in the cost of feed raw materials remains a primary challenge [35], especially in an increasingly volatile and disrupted global supply chain environment. Maximizing the utilization of CP and AA at the lowest possible feed cost can offer nutritionists a window of opportunity to improve overall broiler profitability. Reformulating diets to lower cost and reduced CP and AA levels with the use of proteases has proven to be an effective strategy in this respect [3640]. Growth performance improvements following the application of proteases to broiler diets have been previously reported [1418,20,21,34,37,4143] and are in line with the magnitude of FCR improvement (5.7 points) achieved in the current study by the supplementation of the multi-protease to the diet reduced in CP and AA. However, the supplementation of the serine and the alkaline monocomponent proteases did not result in improved growth performance in our study. Many of the previous studies that showed growth performance improvements of dietary protease supplementation were performed with monocomponent proteases [14,1618,20,21,34,4143], which is not aligned with the lack of growth performance effect seen in the present study. On the other hand, several previous studies where the application of protease had limited effect on growth or nutrient digestibility ascribed this to the presence of other feed additives in the diet, in particular high levels of phytase and NSP-degrading enzymes [23,24,43]. Both classes of enzymes are known to improve nitrogen retention and AA digestibility through indirect mechanisms: phytase reduces the anti-nutritive and protein-binding effect of phytate [5], while NSP-degrading enzymes reduce the caging effect of fiber, allowing endogenous enzymes access to dietary CP [10,11]. The diets in the present study were formulated along with commercial guidelines and contained 1000 FTU/kg of phytase, a combination of 3 NSP-degrading enzymes, amylase, and neutral protease, as well as a biosurfactant also known to have indirect effects on nitrogen utilization [12]. It could be hypothesized that the addition of the multiprotease with a wide effective pH range could have been determinant to improve feed efficiency in the presence of multiple performance enhancing additives.

Intestinal morphology

The benefits of the dietary supplementation of protease on growth performance are ascribed to increased CP digestibility [4447], and they may be attributed to changes in intestinal morphology [38,48], reductions in the impact of antinutrients including trypsin inhibitors [4951], and shifts in the microbiome [20,21]. The specific mode of action of dietary protease supplementation on intestinal morphology has not been well understood. Our results showed that protease supplementation had significant impact on intestinal morphology. All tested proteases provided a longer VH in the duodenum and jejunum compared to the NC. Longer VH is closely linked with greater capacity for nutrient absorption [52,53]. VH was depressed between the PC and NC, with the reductions in AA level linked to significantly shorter villi in the ileum, and near significant reductions in the duodenum and jejunum. The same pattern is seen for the reduction in VH:CD ratio in the different intestinal segments: the earlier segments showed no (duodenum) or minimal (−16.0%, jejunum) reductions, whilst a severe reduction in VH:CD was recorded in the ileum (9.47 PC vs. 5.82 NC, −38.5%), the primary site of nutrient absorption. This will provide a smaller area available for the absorption of nutrients, likely contributing to depressed feed digestibility and efficiency. It is possible that the ileum is most heavily affected by the gut health effects of undigested CP, as this is often the site where Clostridium perfringens, a pathogen which benefits from poor CP digestibility, is recovered from infected broilers [54].

Ding et al. [55] reported that CP reduction led to decreased trypsin activity in the pancreas and duodenum content with both VH and VH:CD ratio reduced in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. However, protease supplementation reverted these effects and increased the activity of trypsin in the pancreas and VH in the duodenum, jejunum and VH:CD ratio in the ileum. Similarly, in the present study VH in the duodenum and jejunum was significantly improved by all proteases, with the alkaline protease linked to the longest villi in all segments. This finding is also in line with other previous research studies [15,24,55,56]. This suggests that the monocomponent alkaline protease tested in the present study was the most effective at increasing gut health and absorptive capacity in the small intestine. However, this did not translate into the best growth performance. It could be hypothesized that protease supplementation may provide more AA to be utilized by certain beneficial bacterial groups that are known to stimulate the production of mucin and the proliferation of epithelial cells [57], and that this effect could differ between proteases. Further studies evaluating the effect of the different proteases in the microbiome composition and intestinal morphology would be needed to validate this hypothesis.

Selected carcass traits

Growth performance of broilers from modern genetics is more responsive to CP and AA compared to energy [27], and protein deposition in the chicken carcass is increased with additional AA intake [58]. Increases in overall BWG were not significantly different between treatments in the present study, including between the nutritionally adequate PC and the reformulated NC. However, there were significant differences between treatments on carcass weight. The reformulation to lower AA content significantly reduced the carcass weight and carcass yield of the NC, compared to the PC. This difference was partially ameliorated by the addition of the alkaline monocomponent protease and totally recovered by the addition of the serine monocomponent protease, while addition of the multi-protease was able to significantly increase carcass weight and yield above the level of the PC. This is in line with the findings of Cho et al. [37], who saw increased carcass weights and breast yields following supplementation of multi-protease to both nutritionally adequate and reformulated diets. Xu et al. [15], also found that the dietary supplementation of a multi-protease increased breast muscle weight. This effect was possibly linked to higher slaughtering weight because it was not translated to higher breast muscle yield. Similarly, in the present study, higher carcass weight resulted in higher breast weight but not in higher breast meat yield following the multi-protease supplementation. These improvements in efficiency and carcass weight and yield are likely largely driven by improvements in AA digestion and protein deposition, however, a digestibility assay was not performed in the present study and this hypothesis could not be confirmed. Previous studies have demonstrated that both monocomponent and multi-proteases improve precaecal AA digestibility of all [7,38] or some AA [16,20,59]. Protease supplementation can also improve energy retention, though results are inconsistent between and even within studies [17,60]. Improved nutrient absorption following protease supplementation has been previously linked with reduced FI [14,36], though significant differences in FI were not seen in the present study.

In conclusion, the addition of a multi-protease to broiler diets reduced in CP and AA improved feed efficiency compared to all other tested proteases. Both the multi-protease and the monocomponent serine protease increased carcass weight, carcass yield, and breast weight and supported gut health and morphology. The monocomponent serine protease also improved breast %. Our findings show that a multi-protease can be supplemented to broiler diets reduced in CP and AA to enhance feed efficiency in the presence of 3 NSP-degrading enzymes, amylase, neutral protease, phytase, and biosurfactants. The addition of monocomponent proteases with a more limited pH range was not able to achieve the same performance improvements. Further studies should be performed to elucidate the effects of the different proteases in CP and AA digestibility, and microbiome composition.

Competing interests

The authors Majdi A. Abu Ishmais and Sadiq Al-Amaireh certify that they have no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors Alexandra L. Wealleans, Roba Abo Ashour and David Gonzalez-Sanchez are employees of Kemin Animal Nutrition and Health (Kemin Europa N.V.). Kemin Europa N.V provided support in the form of salaries but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The origin of author salaries does not alter authors’ adherence to journal policies and materials.

Funding sources

This study was supported by Kemin Europa N.V. (KAE-22-114).

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Wealleans AL, Gonzalez-Sanchez D.

Formal analysis: Wealleans AL, Ishmais MAA.

Validation: Ishmais MAA.

Investigation: Ashour RA, Ishmais MAA, Al-Amaireh S.

Writing - original draft: Wealleans AL, Gonzalez-Sanchez D.

Writing - review & editing: Wealleans AL, Ashour RA, Ishmais MAA, Al-Amaireh S, Gonzalez-Sanchez D.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with commercial practices and were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) of the Jordan University of Science & Technology (16/04/12/206). All experimental procedures were compliant with all local animal welfare legislation.

References

1.

Thirumalaisamy G, Muralidharan J, Senthilkumar S, Hema Sayee R, Priyadharsini M. Cost-effective feeding of poultry. Int J Sci Environ Technol. 2016; 5:3997-4005

2.

Greenhalgh S, Chrystal PV, Selle PH, Liu SY. Reduced-crude protein diets in chicken-meat production: justification for an imperative. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2020; 76:537-48

3.

van Harn J, Dijkslag MA, van Krimpen MM. Effect of low protein diets supplemented with free amino acids on growth performance, slaughter yield, litter quality, and footpad lesions of male broilers. Poult Sci. 2019; 98:4868-77

4.

Wilkie DC, Van Kessel AG, White LJ, Laarveld B, Drew MD. Dietary amino acids affect intestinal Clostridium perfringens populations in broiler chickens. Can J Anim Sci. 2005; 85:185-93

5.

Ravindran V, Cabahug S, Ravindran G, Bryden WL. Influence of microbial phytase on apparent ileal amino acid digestibility of feedstuffs for broilers. Poult Sci. 1999; 78:699-706

6.

Dersjant-Li Y, Awati A, Schulze H, Partridge G. Phytase in non-ruminant animal nutrition: a critical review on phytase activities in the gastrointestinal tract and influencing factors. J Sci Food Agric. 2015; 95:878-96

7.

Cowieson AJ, Ruckebusch JP, Sorbara JOB, Wilson JW, Guggenbuhl P, Roos FF. A systematic view on the effect of phytase on ileal amino acid digestibility in broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2017; 225:182-94

8.

Hew LI, Ravindran V, Mollah Y, Bryden WL. Influence of exogenous xylanase supplementation on apparent metabolisable energy and amino acid digestibility in wheat for broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1998; 75:83-92

9.

Liu WC, Kim IH. Effects of dietary xylanase supplementation on performance and functional digestive parameters in broilers fed wheat-based diets. Poult Sci. 2017; 96:566-73

10.

Van Hoeck V, Somers I, Abdelqader A, Wealleans AL, Van de Craen S, Morisset D. Xylanase impact beyond performance: a microbiome approach in laying hens. PLOS ONE. 2021; 16e0257681

11.

Van Hoeck V, Wu D, Somers I, Wealleans A, Vasanthakumari BL, Gonzalez Sanchez AL, et al. Xylanase impact beyond performance: a prebiotic approach in broiler chickens. J Appl Poult Res. 2021; 30:100193

12.

Wealleans AL, Buyse J, Scholey D, Van Campenhout L, Burton E, Di Benedetto M, et al. Lysolecithin, but not lecithin, improves nutrient digestibility and growth rates in young broilers. Br Poult Sci. 2020; 61:414-23

13.

Haetinger VS, Dalmoro YK, Godoy GL, Lang MB, de Souza OF, Aristimunha P, et al. Optimizing cost, growth performance, and nutrient absorption with a bio-emulsifier based on lysophospholipids for broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2021; 100:101025

14.

Cowieson AJ, Roos FF. Bioefficacy of a mono-component protease in the diets of pigs and poultry: a meta-analysis of effect on ileal amino acid digestibility. J Appl Anim Nutr. 2013; 2:e13

15.

Xu X, Wang HL, Pan L, Ma XK, Tian QY, Xu YT, et al. Effects of coated proteases on the performance, nutrient retention, gut morphology and carcass traits of broilers fed corn or sorghum based diets supplemented with soybean meal. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2017; 223:119-27

16.

Cowieson AJ, Toghyani M, Kheravii SK, Wu SB, Romero LF, Choct M. A mono-component microbial protease improves performance, net energy, and digestibility of amino acids and starch, and upregulates jejunal expression of genes responsible for peptide transport in broilers fed corn/wheat-based diets supplemented with xylanase and phytase. Poult Sci. 2019; 98:1321-32

17.

McCafferty KW, Toghyani M, Morgan NK, Cowieson AJ, Choct M, Moss AF. Effects of protease supplementation and diet type on jejunal and ileal digestibility and total tract metabolisability of nitrogen, starch, and energy in broilers. Br Poult Sci. 2022; 63:386-94

18.

Rada V, Lichovnikova M, Foltyn M. The effect of serine protease on broiler growth and carcass quality. Acta Fytotech Zootech. 2014; 17:87-9

19.

Giannenas I, Bonos E, Anestis V, Filioussis G, Papanastasiou DK, Bartzanas T, et al. Effects of protease addition and replacement of soybean meal by corn gluten meal on the growth of broilers and on the environmental performances of a broiler production system in greece. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12e0169511

20.

Borda-Molina D, Zuber T, Siegert W, Camarinha-Silva A, Feuerstein D, Rodehutscord M. Effects of protease and phytase supplements on small intestinal microbiota and amino acid digestibility in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2019; 98:2906-18

21.

Lourenco JM, Nunn SC, Lee EJ, Dove CR, Callaway TR, Azain MJ. Effect of supplemental protease on growth performance and excreta microbiome of broiler chicks. Microorganisms. 2020; 8:475

22.

Leinonen I, Williams AG. Effects of dietary protease on nitrogen emissions from broiler production: a holistic comparison using Life Cycle Assessment. J Sci Food Agric. 2015; 95:3041-6

23.

Lee SA, Bedford MR, Walk CL. Meta-analysis: explicit value of mono-component proteases in monogastric diets. Poult Sci. 2018; 97:2078-85

24.

Tari LM, Perera N, Zaefarian F, Abdollahi MR, Cowieson AJ, Ravindran V. Influence of barley inclusion method and protease supplementation on growth performance, nutrient utilisation, and gastrointestinal tract development in broiler starters. Anim Nutr. 2022; 8:61-70

25.

Schindler T, Michel S, Wilson AWM. Nutrition management of cystic fibrosis in the 21st century. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015; 30:488-500

26.

Aviagen. Ross broiler nutrition specifications 2019 [Internet]. Aviagen 2019 [cited 2022 Oct 13]https://www.cipa.com.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/RossBroilerNutritionSpecs2019-EN.pdf.

27.

Aftab U. Energy and amino acid requirements of broiler chickens: keeping pace with the genetic progress. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2019; 75:507-14

28.

Johnson CA, Duong T, Latham RE, Shirley RB, Lee JT. Increasing amino acid density improves growth performance and processing yield in Cobb 700 × MV broilers. J Appl Poult Res. 2020; 29:465-78

29.

Johnson CA, Duong T, Latham RE, Shirley RB, Lee JT. Effects of amino acid and energy density on growth performance and processing yield of mixed-sex Cobb 700 × MV broiler chickens. J Appl Poult Res. 2020; 29:269-83

30.

Barekatain R, Nattrass G, Tilbrook AJ, Chousalkar K, Gilani S. Reduced protein diet and amino acid concentration alter intestinal barrier function and performance of broiler chickens with or without synthetic glucocorticoid. Poult Sci. 2019; 98:3662-75

31.

Pesti GM. Impact of dietary amino acid and crude protein levels in broiler feeds on biological performance. J Appl Poult Res. 2009; 18:477-86

32.

Yin D, Chrystal PV, Moss AF, Liu SY, Yuan J, Selle PH. Effects of reducing dietary crude protein and whole grain feeding on performance and amino acid metabolism in broiler chickens offered wheat-based diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020; 260:114386

33.

Maynard CW, Kidd MT, Chrystal PV, McQuade LR, McInerney BV, Selle PH, et al. Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets. Anim Nutr. 2022; 10:1-11

34.

Law FL, Zulkifli I, Soleimani AF, Liang JB, Awad EA. The effects of low-protein diets and protease supplementation on broiler chickens in a hot and humid tropical environment. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018; 31:1291-300

35.

Hafez HM, Attia YA. Challenges to the poultry industry: current perspectives and strategic future after the COVID-19 outbreak. Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7:516

36.

Rehman ZU, Kamran J, Abd El-Hack ME, Alagawany M, Bhatti SA, Ahmad G, et al. Influence of low-protein and low-amino acid diets with different sources of protease on performance, carcasses and nitrogen retention of broiler chickens. Anim Prod Sci. 2018; 58:1625-31

37.

Cho HM, Hong JS, Kim YB, Nawarathne SR, Choi I, Yi YJ, et al. Responses in growth performance and nutrient digestibility to a multi-protease supplementation in amino acid-deficient broiler diets. J Anim Sci Technol. 2020; 62:840-53

38.

Cowieson AJ, Abdollahi MR, Zaefarian F, Pappenberger G, Ravindran V. The effect of a mono-component exogenous protease and graded concentrations of ascorbic acid on the performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal architecture of broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2018; 235:128-37

39.

Mohammadigheisar M, Kim IH. Addition of a protease to low crude protein density diets of broiler chickens. J Appl Anim Res. 2018; 46:1377-81

40.

Wang T, Ling H, Zhang W, Zhou Y, Li Y, Hu Y, et al. Protease or Clostridium butyricum addition to a low-protein diet improves broiler growth performance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022; 106:7917-31

41.

McCafferty KW, Choct M, Musigwa S, Morgan NK, Cowieson AJ, Moss AF. Protease supplementation reduced the heat increment of feed and improved energy and nitrogen partitioning in broilers fed maize-based diets with supplemental phytase and xylanase. Anim Nutr. 2022; 10:19-25

42.

Amerah AM, Romero LF, Awati A, Ravindran V. Effect of exogenous xylanase, amylase, and protease as single or combined activities on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of broilers fed corn/soy diets. Poult Sci. 2017; 96:807-16

43.

Wealleans AL, Walsh MC, Romero LF, Ravindran V. Comparative effects of two multi-enzyme combinations and a Bacillus probiotic on growth performance, digestibility of energy and nutrients, disappearance of non-starch polysaccharides, and gut microflora in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2017; 96:4287-97

44.

Angel CR, Saylor W, Vieira SL, Ward N. Effects of a monocomponent protease on performance and protein utilization in 7- to 22-day-old broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2011; 90:2281-6

45.

Park JH, Lee SI, Kim IH. The effect of protease on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and expression of growth-related genes and amino acid transporters in broilers. J Anim Sci Technol. 2020; 62:614-27

46.

Jabbar A, Tahir M, Khan RU, Ahmad N. Interactive effect of exogenous protease enzyme and dietary crude protein levels on growth and digestibility indices in broiler chickens during the starter phase. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021; 53:23

47.

Jabbar A, Tahir M, Alhidary IA, Abdelrahman MA, Albadani H, Khan RU, et al. Impact of microbial protease enzyme and dietary crude protein levels on growth and nutrients digestibility in broilers over 15–28 days. Animals. 2021; 11:2499

48.

Cowieson AJ, Zaefarian F, Knap I, Ravindran V. Interactive effects of dietary protein concentration, a mono-component exogenous protease and ascorbic acid on broiler performance, nutritional status and gut health. Anim Prod Sci. 2017; 57:1058-68

49.

Wedekind KJ, Chen J, Yan F, Escobar J, Vazquez-Anon M. Efficacy of a mono-component protease is affected by trypsin inhibitor concentration in soybean meal. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020; 265:114502

50.

Aderibigbe A, Cowieson AJ, Sorbara JO, Pappenberger G, Adeola O. Growth performance and amino acid digestibility responses of broiler chickens fed diets containing purified soybean trypsin inhibitor and supplemented with a monocomponent protease. Poult Sci. 2020; 99:5007-17

51.

Erdaw MM, Perez-Maldonado RA, Iji PA. Apparent and standardized ileal nutrient digestibility of broiler diets containing varying levels of raw full-fat soybean and microbial protease. J Anim Sci Technol. 2017; 59:23

52.

Caspary WF. Physiology and pathophysiology of intestinal absorption. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992; 55:299S-308S

53.

Choct M. Enzymes for the feed industry: past, present and future. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2006; 62:5-16

54.

Craven SE. Colonization of the intestinal tract by Clostridium perfringens and fecal shedding in diet-stressed and unstressed broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2000; 79:843-9

55.

Ding XM, Li DD, Li ZR, Wang JP, Zeng QF, Bai SP, et al. Effects of dietary crude protein levels and exogenous protease on performance, nutrient digestibility, trypsin activity and intestinal morphology in broilers. Livest Sci. 2016; 193:26-31

56.

Kamel NF, Naela , Ragaa M, El-Banna RA, Mohamed FF. Effects of a monocomponent protease on performance parameters and protein digestibility in broiler chickens. Agric Agric Sci Procedia. 2015; 6:216-25

57.

Kidd MT, Maynard CW, Mullenix GJ. Progress of amino acid nutrition for diet protein reduction in poultry. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021; 12:45

58.

Eits RM, Kwakkel RP, Verstegen MWA, Stoutjesdijk P, De Greef KH. Protein and lipid deposition rates in male broiler chickens: separate responses to amino acids and protein-free energy. Poult Sci. 2002; 81:472-80

59.

Liu SY, Selle PH, Court SG, Cowieson AJ. Protease supplementation of sorghum-based broiler diets enhances amino acid digestibility coefficients in four small intestinal sites and accelerates their rates of digestion. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013; 183:175-83

60.

Hejdysz M, Kaczmarek SA, Kubiś M, Wiśniewska Z, Peris S, Budnik S, et al. The effect of protease and Bacillus licheniformis on nutritional value of pea, faba bean, yellow lupin and narrow-leaved lupin in broiler chicken diets. Br Poult Sci. 2020; 61:287-93