Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology

J Anim Sci Technol 2023; 65(3):535-549

pISSN: 2672-0191, eISSN: 2055-0391

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2023.e19

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of different stocking density and various phytogenic feed additives dosage levels on growing-finishing pigs

Hyun Ah Cho¹^,^#

, Min Ho Song²^,^#

, Ji Hwan Lee³^,^#

, Han Jin Oh¹

, Yong Ju Kim¹

, Jae Woo An¹

, Se Yeon Chang¹

, Young Bin Go¹

, Dong Cheol Song¹

, Seung Yeol Cho⁴

, Dong Jun Kim⁴

, Mi Suk Kim⁴

, Hae Ryoung Park⁶

, Hyeun Bum Kim⁵^,^*

, Jin Ho Cho¹^,^*

¹Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea

²Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea

³Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia (UGA), Athens, GA 30602, United States

⁴Eugene-Bio, Suwon 16675, Korea

⁵Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea

⁶Korea Agriculture Technology Promotion Agency, Iksan 54667, Korea

# These authors contributed equally to this work.

^*Corresponding author: Hyeun Bum Kim, Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea. Tel: +82-41-550-3652, E-mail: hbkim@dankook.ac.kr

^*Corresponding author: Jin Ho Cho, Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. Tel: +82-43-261-2544, E-mail: jinhcho@chungbuk.ac.kr

© Copyright 2023 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Sep 05, 2022; Revised: Jan 31, 2023; Accepted: Feb 14, 2023

Published Online: May 31, 2023

Abstract

This study was to investigate the effects of different phytogenic feed additives (PFA) dosage levels in growing- finishing pigs stressed by high stocking density. A total of 72 mix sexed 12 weeks growing pigs ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) with initial body weight (BW) of 49.28 ± 4.58 kg were used for 8 weeks. There were 3 replicate pens in each treatment group, with 3 pigs per pen. The dietary treatment groups consisted of basal diets in animal welfare density (negative control [NC]), basal diet in high stocking density (positive control [PC]), PC + 0.04% essential oil (ES1), PC + 0.08% essential oil (ES2), PC + 0.10% bitter citrus extract & essential oil (CES1), PC + 0.20% bitter citrus extract & essential oil (CES2), PC + 0.05% grape pomace extract (GP1), PC + 0.10% grape pomace extract (GP2). The reduction of space allowance decreased (p < 0.05) average daily gain, feed efficiency, and digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, and gross energy. Also, the fecal score of PC groups increased (p < 0.05) compared with other groups. Basic behaviors (feed intake, standing, lying) were inactive (p < 0.05) and singularity behavior (biting) was increased (p < 0.10) under high stocking density. There was no difference in blood profile. However, the supplementation of PFA alleviated the negative effects such as reduced growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and some increasing stress indicators in th blood (cortisol) and animal behavior (biting). In conclusion, the negative effect of high stocking density was most effectively mitigated by the normal dosage of the mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil additive (CES1).

Keywords: Pig; Dosage; Additive; Stress; Plant extract; Stocking density

INTRODUCTION

Improving the stress resilience of livestock is critical to profitable meat production. It also addresses ethical, animal welfare, and sustainability issues. However, pigs are still stocked at a high density for effective management, improvement of space utilization, and profitability [1]. High stocking density can cause the absence of living and feeding space, generation of heat energy, and interference with airflow, thereby causing reduced access to feed and water due to heat stress and poor air quality caused by noxious gas [2]. Consequently, pigs with high stocking density are affected by severe environmental and psychological stress. Such stress can adversely affect the health of pigs [3,4]. The high stocking density can cause heat stress, which increases oxidative stress in the body [5]. If this stress is not well managed in pigs, it can increase susceptibility to stress and hence reduce immune and health status. Phytogenic feed additives (PFA) such as herbs, spices, and their extracts are broadly defined as plant-derived bioactive compounds. They are often supplemented into animal diets [6]. Many studies have reported positive effects of PFA on animal health and growth performance under various stress environments [7,8]. However, their function and impact can vary depending on plant origin, extraction method, and formulation. Only few studies have compared different dosage of PFA with various additives. In addition, studies searching for effective PFA against stress derived from high stocking density are limited. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of PFA dosage levels on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profile, and animal behavior of growing-finishing pigs in different stocking density.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experimental protocol for this study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea (approval CBNUA-1642-21-02).

Preparation of phytogenic feed additives

Three types of additives with two dosage levels (normal, double) were used in this experiment. ES is essential oil. It contains a microcapsulated blend of 7% thymol and 7% carvacrol (AviPower 2, VetAgro SpA, Reggio, Emmilia, Italy). Bitter citrus extract (BioFlavex^®, HTBA, Beniel, Spain) contains 25%–27% naringin and 11%–15% neohesperdin. CES is a mixture of bitter citrus extract, essential oil, and excipient in the ratio of 1:4:5. It contains 0.7% thymol, 0.7% carvacrol, 10%–10.8% naringin, and 4.4%–6% neohesperidin. GP is grape pomace extract. It contains a premixture of grape seed & grape marc extract, green tea, and hops (AntaOx^®FlavoSyn, DR. Eckel GmbH, Niederzissen, Germany) containing more than 10% of flavonoids. All PFAs materials were provided by EUGENE BIO (Suwon, Korea).

Animals, housing, and experimental design

In total, 12 weeks of age 72 mixed-sex growing pigs ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) with average initial body weight (BW) of 49.28 ± 4.58 kg were used in 10-week feeding trial. The experiment was performed with 8 treatment groups according to 3 types of PFA, 2 dosage levels, and 2 types of stocking density. Pigs were allotted to one of eight treatments in a completely randomized block design based on initial BW. Treatments were as follows: negative control (NC; basal diet in animal welfare density), positive control (PC; basal diet in high stocking density), ES1 (basal diet with 0.04% essential oil in high stocking density), ES2 (basal diet with 0.08% essential oil in high stocking density), CES1 (basal diet with 0.1% bitter citrus extract & essential oil in high stocking density), CES2 (basal diet with 0.2% bitter citrus extract & essential oil in high stocking density), GP1(basal diet with 0.05% grape pomace extract in high stocking density), GP2 (basal diet with 0.10% grape pomace extract in high stocking density). Each treatment had three replicates per treatment with three pigs. All of the pigs were kept in one of two types of environmental-controlled rooms NC set the animal welfare density during the whole experimental period and the remaining treatment groups were set based on animal welfare standard decreasing 20% in growing period and decreasing 40% in finishing period. During growing pig periods, animal welfare stocking density is 0.55m²/pig and high stocking density is 0.40 m²/pig. During finishing pig periods, animal welfare stocking density is 1.00 m²/pig, and high stocking density is 0.60 m²/pig. The diets were formulated to meet or exceed the National Research Council [9] recommendation for growing-finishing pigs (Table 1). During the experimental period, each pen was equipped with a self-feeder and nipple drinker to allow ad libitum access to feed and water.

Table 1. Ingredients and chemical composition of the basal experimental diets (as fed basis)

Items	Grower 0–2 w	Finisher 2–8 w
Ingredients (%)
Corn	65.10	72.38
Soybean meal	23.90	17.40
Wheat bran	7.00	6.00
Soybean oil	1.00	1.00
L-Lysine	0.10	0.28
DL-Methionine	0.04	0.04
L-Theronine	0.03	0.03
Dicalcium phosphate	1.00	1.00
Limestone	1.20	1.25
Salt	0.50	0.50
Vitamin premix¹⁾	0.08	0.08
Mineral premix²⁾	0.05	0.05
Calculated composition
ME (kcal/kg)	3,276	3,284
Crude protein (%)	18.00	15.50
Lysine (%)	1.01	0.97
Methionine (%)	0.33	0.29
Calcium (%)	0.78	0.76
Phosphorus (%)	0.62	0.58

Provided per kilogram of complete diet: 20,000 IU of vitamin A, 4,000 IU of vitaminD₃, 80 IU of vitamin E, 16 mg of vitamin K₃, 4 mg of thiamine, 20 mg of riboflavin, 6 mg of pyridoxine, 0.08 mg of vitamin B₁₂, 120 mg of niacin, 50 mg of Ca-Pantothenate, 2 mg of folic acid, 0.08 mg of biotin.

Provided per kilogram of complete diet: 12.5 mg of manganese, 179 mg of zinc, 140 mg of copper, 0.5 mg of iodine, 0.4 mg of selenium.

ME, metabolizable energy.

Download Excel Table

Growth performance

To calculate average daily gain (ADG), pig’s BW was individually measured at 09:00 on an empty stomach at the start of grower (week 0), end of grower and start of finisher (week 2), and end of the finisher (week 8). During the experiment, each pig feed intake and wasted feed were recorded daily to calculate average daily intake (ADFI). Feed efficiency (G:F) was calculated by ratio of BW gain and feed intake. During experiment, each pig fecal score was measured by same person before daily feeding. The fecal was scored according to its moisture content and shape. Normal feces are 0-point, soft feces are 1-point, mild diarrhea are 2-point and severe diarrhea are 3-point [10]. The score was calculated by averaging each group with the average value of the daily fecal score of each pig.

Nutrient digestibility

For nutrient digestibility, 0.2% of chromium oxide (Cr₂O₃) in the test feed was added as an indicator at week 2 and week 10 after the start of the test, and minutes were collected by anal massage after feeding from 3 days before sample collection. The collected minutes were dried in a dryer at 60°C. for 72 hours, then pulverized with a Willey mill and used for analysis. Powder samples were analyzed for dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and gross energy (GE). DM analyzed samples for 16 hours in an oven at 105°C according to the AOAC method [11]. CP was calculated by multiplying the sample by 6.25 by titrating N according to the Kjeldahl method. GE was analyzed using a bomb calorimeter (model 12361, Parr Instrument, Moline, IL, USA).

Blood sample

For blood analysis, 1 pig per pen was randomly selected at week 2 and week 10 of the experiment, and blood was collected through the jugular vein. Immediately after blood collection, blood was dispensed into EDTA-treated tubes and serum separation tubes. The blood dispensed into the serum tube was stored in a −20°C freezer from which serum was separated through centrifugation at 12,500×g, 20 min, and 4°C until analysis. Blood leukocytes-based hemocytometry was performed using an automated hematology analyzer (ADVIA120, Bayer, Tarrytown, NY, USA) and serum cortisol levels were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (LDN GmbH & Co., Nordhorn, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. was evaluated using Tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations were analyzed with an ELISA kit (Quantikine, R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and measured at 450 nm.

Pig behavior

Collection of each pig image data was recorded by using one- day/night infrared cameras (QNB-7080 RH, Hanwha, Seoul, Korea) installed 3m above each pen. A total of 24 pig behaviors were analyzed by randomly selecting one pig from each pen. Observers gathered data based on Yang et al. [12] findings, and only one person was responsible for all observations and video analysis to ensure consistency. The pig behavior analysis was classified for the following criteria (A) Feed intake: the act of eating with the head in the feed bin, or similar behavior. (B) Standing: the act of standing still with the forelimbs and hindlimbs extended perpendicular to the floor, or similar behavior. (C) Lying: the act of lying with the whole body on the floor, lying with the head, front legs, hind legs and abdomen all touching the floor. (D) Sitting: Two front legs are spread vertically to the floor, two rear legs and two hips are sitting on the floor, like a dog sitting on the floor, or something like that. (E) Drinking water: the act of drinking water for 10 seconds by putting your mouth in a drinking nipple (F) Posture transition (lying → standing) A behavior that changes from lying down to standing, in which the two front legs are stretched first, and the hind legs are naturally stretched out. (G): Posture transition (standing → lying): A behavior that changes from a standing behavior to a lying behavior, in which the two front legs are bent to the floor first, and then the two hind legs are naturally folded and lying down. (H) Rooting: the act of repeating similar behaviors, such as scratches, itching, or something on the nose and front legs. (I) Biting: The act of biting another pig’s ears, mouth, and tail with teeth and then biting again or doing similar things.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed by SPSS software (ver. 25.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) orthogonal contrasts were used to compare possible relationships between treatments using the PROC procedure using a general linear model and the differences among treatments were examined by Tukey’s multiple range test, which was considered to be significant at p < 0.05, unless otherwise stated.

RESULTS

Growth performance

The effects of different stocking density and PFA dosage levels on growth performance were shown in Table 2. There was no difference between groups in the initial and week 2 BW of pigs. At weeks 0–2 (growing phase), PC group significantly decreased (p < 0.05) ADG, G:F ratio, and significantly increased (p < 0.05) frequency of diarrhea compared to NC group. Compared with the PC group, CES1 group and CES2 group significantly increased (p < 0.05) G:F ratio.

Table 2. Effects of dosage level of phytogenic feed additives on growth performance in growing-finishing pigs with stressed by stocking density

Items	NC	High stocking density							SEM	p-value
Items	NC	PC	ES1 (0.05%)	ES2 (0.10%)	CES1 (0.10%)	CES2 (0.20%)	GP1 (0.04%)	GP2 (0.08%)	SEM	p-value
BW (kg)
Initial⁴⁾	49.36	48.98	49.33	49.29	49.39	49.38	49.32	49.21	0.54	0.990
2 W^1),4)	64.71	58.91	61.26	60.08	62.32	61.07	61.24	60.51	0.62	0.483
8 W^1),2),4)	121.19^a	105.19^c	108.72^bc	107.39^c	115.13^ab	107.53^c	109.44^bc	108.00^bc	0.81	< 0.001
0–2 W
ADG^{1),2),3),4),5)} (kg)	1.10^a	0.71^c	0.85^bc	0.77^bc	0.92^b	0.83^bc	0.85^bc	0.81^bc	0.02	< 0.001
ADFI^{1),3),4),6),7),11)} (kg)	2.52^a	2.09^c	2.25^b	2.17^bc	2.11^c	1.92^d	2.12^c	2.10^c	0.02	< 0.001
G:F^{1),2),4),5),6),8)}	0.44^a	0.34^c	0.38^ab	0.35^b	0.44^a	0.44^a	0.40^ab	0.38^ab	0.01	< 0.001
Fecal score^1),2),3),4)	0.29^b	0.88^a	0.33^b	0.48^b	0.36^b	0.38^b	0.40^b	0.44^b	0.02	< 0.001
2-8 W
ADG^1),4) (kg)	1.34^a	1.10^b	1.13^b	1.13^b	1.26^a	1.11^b	1.15^b	1.13^b	0.01	< 0.001
ADFI^4),5),6),7) (kg)	3.63^ab	3.70^ab	3.45^ab	3.79^a	3.51^ab	3.16^c	3.46^bc	3.46^b	0.03	< 0.001
G:F^{1),2),4),5),6),7),8)}	0.37^a	0.30^c	0.32^bc	0.30^c	0.36^ab	0.36^ab	0.33^abc	0.33^bc	0.01	< 0.001
0–8 W
ADG^{1),2),3),4),5),8)} (kg)	1.28^a	1.00^d	1.06^cd	1.04^cd	1.17^b	1.04^d	1.08^c	1.05^cd	0.01	< 0.001
ADFI^4),5),6),7) (kg)	3.35^abc	3.30^a	3.21^abc	3.38^ab	3.16^bc	2.85^d	3.12^c	3.13^c	0.03	< 0.001
G:F^{1),2),4),5),6),7),8)}	0.45^a	0.30^e	0.39^cd	0.36^de	0.44^ab	0.43^ab	0.41^bc	0.40^cd	0.00	< 0.001

Contrast: NC vs PC (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Other treatments (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Essential oil vs Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Essential oil vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Means with different letters are significantly differ (p < 0.05) or tend to differ (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10).

NC, basal diet in animal welfare density; PC, basal diet in high stocking density; ES1, basal diet with essential oil 0.05% in high stocking density; ES2, basal diet with essential oil 0.10% in high stocking density; CES1, basal diet with mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil 0.10% in high stocking density; CES2, basal diet with mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil 0.20% in high stocking density; GP1, basal diet with grape pomace extract 0.04% in high stocking density; GP2, basal diet with grape pomace extract 0.08% in high stocking density; BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; G:F, feed efficiency; fecal score was determined as follow : 0, normal feces; 1, soft feces; 2, mild diarrhea; 3, severe diarrhea.

Download Excel Table

At weeks 2–8 (finishing period), PC group significantly decreased (p < 0.05) ADG and G:F ratio compared to NC group. Compared with PC group, CES1 group significantly increased (p < 0.05) ADG, week 8 BW and G:F ratio, and CES2 group significantly increased (p < 0.05) only G:F ratio.

During the entire experimental period (0–8 weeks), PC group significantly decreased (p < 0.05) ADG and G:F ratio compared to NC group. Pigs fed with supplementation of PFA except for ES2 significantly increased (p < 0.05) G:F ratio compared to PC group. Among them, CES1 and CES2 group G:F ratio increased similarly to the NC group. In the case of ADG, CES1 and GP1 group significantly increased (p < 0.05) than PC group.

Nutrient digestibility

The effects of different stocking density and PFA dosage levels on nutrient digestibility were shown in Table 3. At week 2, the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of DM and CP was significantly decreased (p < 0.05) in the PC group compared to NC group. Supplementation of PFA significantly improved (p < 0.05) digestibility of DM and CP compared to PC group. There was no significant difference in GE digestibility between NC group and PC group. The CES1 group showed the highest GE digestibility than other groups including NC (p < 0.05).

Table 3. Effects of dosage level of phytogenic feed additives on nutrient digestibility in growing-finishing pigs with stressed by stocking density

Items	NC	High stocking density							SEM	p-value
Items	NC	PC	ES1 (0.05%)	ES2 (0.10%)	CES1 (0.10%)	CES2 (0.20%)	GP1 (0.04%)	GP2 (0.08%)	SEM	p-value
2 week (%)
DM^{1),2),3),4),5),6),7),8)}	85.17^ab	81.65^d	84.08^bc	83.34^c	86.40^a	83.31^c	84.98^ab	85.43^ab	0.31	< 0.001
CP^{1),2),3),4),5),8)}	75.58^a	70.91^c	74.42^ab	73.39^b	74.77^ab	74.55^ab	73.46^b	73.70^b	0.20	< 0.001
GE^{1),2),3),4),5),8)}	78.79^bc	76.74^cd	78.64^bc	77.04^bcd	81.07^a	74.98^d	78.88^b	78.85^b	0.38	< 0.001
8 week (%)
DM^{1),2),3),4),5),7),8)}	85.67^a	80.15^d	82.88^c	84.46^ab	85.24^ab	84.96^ab	84.26^b	82.28^c	0.23	< 0.001
CP^{1),2),3),4),5),6),7)}	76.67^a	67.14^c	70.19^b	70.05^b	76.78^a	75.47^a	71.04^b	71.15^b	0.41	< 0.001
GE^{1),2),3),4),5),7),8)}	78.35^a	69.65^c	76.98^ab	77.07^ab	78.16^a	78.44^a	76.38^ab	73.82^b	0.64	< 0.001

Contrast: NC vs PC (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Other treatments (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Essential oil vs Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Essential oil vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Means with different letters are significantly differ (p < 0.05) or tend to differ (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10).

NC, basal diet in animal welfare density; PC, basal diet in high stocking density; ES1, basal diet with essential oil 0.05% in high stocking density; ES2, basal diet with essential oil 0.10% in high stocking density; CES1, basal diet with mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil 0.10% in high stocking density; CES2, basal diet with mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil 0.20% in high stocking density; GP1, basal diet with grape pomace extract 0.04% in high stocking density; GP2, basal diet with grape pomace extract 0.08% in high stocking density; DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; GE, gross energy.

Download Excel Table

At week 8, the ATTD of DM, CP and GE in the PC group was significantly decreased (p < 0.05) compared to the NC group. Supplementation of PFA groups significantly improved digestibility of DM, CP and GE compared to PC group. In particular, the CES1 and CES2 group showed similar digestibility to the NC group.

Blood profile

The effects of different stocking density and PFA dosage levels on blood profile were shown in Table 4. At week 2, there were no significant difference between NC group and PC group in blood profile. In the case of IL-6, GP2 group significantly decreased (p < 0.05) compared to PC group.

Table 4. Effects of dosage level of phytogenic feed additives on blood profile in growing-finishing pigs with stressed by stocking density

Items	NC	High stocking density							SEM	p-value
Items	NC	PC	ES1 (0.05%)	ES2 (0.10%)	CES1 (0.10%)	CES2 (0.20%)	GP1 (0.04%)	GP2 (0.08%)	SEM	p-value
2 week
WBC^5),7),8) (10³/µL)	19.67^c	22.37^bc	19.39^c	22.70^bc	25.18^ab	20.08^c	27.51^a	23.34^abc	0.47	< 0.001
Lymphocyte^2),3),4),5) (%)	62.43^a	59.40^a	54.93^ab	47.30^bc	44.07^c	56.57^ab	47.50^bc	54.50^ab	1.00	< 0.001
Neutrophil^2),3),4),6) (%)	33.40^d	35.83^d	38.53^cd	46.70^abc	50.10^a	37.57^d	47.57^ab	39.00^bcd	0.96	< 0.001
Basophil¹⁾ (%)	0.70^a	0.93^a	0.63^ab	0.90^bcd	1.20^a	0.67^a	0.63^cd	1.07^abc	0.04	0.001
Cortisol (µg/dL)	2.70^ab	2.53^ab	2.83^a	1.84^ab	3.72^ab	2.64^ab	4.55^b	1.68^a	0.19	0.002
TNF- α (pg/mL)	31.50^b	63.23^ab	120.8^ab	97.87^ab	38.37^b	94.70^ab	38.70^b	150.00^a	9.66	0.008
IL-6^2),4),5) (pg/mL)	79.33^abc	120.10^ab	131.80^a	59.63^bc	57.63^bc	84.77^abc	95.20^abc	40.03^c	6.14	< 0.001
8 week
WBC (10³/µL)	19.48^ab	21.58^a	20.30^ab	16.87^b	17.86^ab	17.84^ab	17.75^ab	19.15^ab	0.39	0.035
Lymphocyte (%)	70.67	67.37	71.47	67.33	66.03	66.37	69.37	67.73	0.84	0.691
Neutrophil (%)	26.47	29.97	25.53	28.70	29.97	31.20	27.40	28.83	0.84	0.729
Basophil (%)	0.67	0.87	0.70	0.80	0.80	0.70	0.63	0.70	0.25	0.253
Cortisol^2),5) (µg/dL)	4.13^ab	4.49^a	3.33^abc	2.48^abc	1.27^c	3.17^abc	2.02^bc	3.64^ab	0.21	< 0.001
TNF- α^2),5) (pg/mL)	22.77^d	78.67^ab	85.87^a	53.67^bc	32.83^cd	40.83^cd	33.10^cd	49.07^c	3.15	< 0.001
IL-6^4),7) (pg/mL)	47.30^ab	41.70^ab	51.93^ab	34.40^b	49.10^ab	46.90^ab	56.87^a	44.87^ab	1.53	0.012

Contrast: NC vs PC (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Other treatments (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Essential oil vs Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Essential oil vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Means with different letters are significantly differ (p < 0.05) or tend to differ (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10).

NC, basal diet in animal welfare density; PC, basal diet in high stocking density; ES1, basal diet with essential oil 0.05% in high stocking density; ES2, basal diet with essential oil 0.10% in high stocking density; CES1, basal diet with mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil 0.10% in high stocking density; CES2, basal diet with mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil 0.20% in high stocking density; GP1, basal diet with grape pomace extract 0.04% in high stocking density; GP2, basal diet with grape pomace extract 0.08% in high stocking density; WBC, white blood cell; TNF- α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-6, Interleukin-6.

Download Excel Table

At week 8, CES1 group cortisol level significantly decreased (p < 0.05) compared to other supplementation of PFA groups. In the case of TNF-α, PC group significantly increased (p < 0.05) than NC group. CES, GP groups significantly alleviated (p < 0.05) TNF-α level than PC group.

Pig behavior

The effects of different stocking density and PFA dosage levels on animal behavior were shown in Table 5 and 6 and, Fig. 1. During growing pig period (week 2), PC group significantly decreased (p < 0.05) feed intake time and increased (p < 0.05) standing time than NC group. Compared to PC group, CES1 group significantly increased (p < 0.05) feed intake time and CES2 group significantly increased (p < 0.05) feed intake time and decreased (p < 0.05) standing time. CES1 group showed lower biting frequency (p < 0.05) than PC group and similar with NC group.

Table 5. Effects of dosage level of phytogenic feed additives on behavior changes in growing pigs with stressed by stocking density

Items	NC	High stocking density							SEM	p-value
Items	NC	PC	ES1 (0.05%)	ES2 (0.10%)	CES1 (0.10%)	CES2 (0.20%)	GP1 (0.04%)	GP2 (0.08%)	SEM	p-value
Basic behavior (min/hour)
Feed intake^{1),3),4),5),6),8)}	4.55^a	4.25^c	4.33^bc	4.30^bc	4.46^ab	4.49^ab	4.33^bc	4.36^abc	0.02	0.001
Standing^{1),3),4),5),6),8)}	6.57^b	7.42^a	6.94^ab	6.93^ab	6.83^ab	6.55^b	6.80^ab	7.11^ab	0.07	0.009
Lying^{1),3),4),5),6),8)}	45.45	43.90	44.42	44.43	45.31	44.43	44.60	44.53	0.15	0.069
Sitting^1),4),5),6)	3.43	4.44	4.32	4.35	3.52	4.40	4.27	4.00	0.11	0.045
Singularity behavior (count/hour)
Drink water^4),8)	5.25	5.15	5.19	5.18	5.23	5.21	5.15	5.16	0.02	0.949
Rooting	2.06	2.09	2.12	2.08	2.05	2.06	2.07	2.08	0.18	0.996
Posture transition (lying-sitting)^1),3),4),5)	2.17	2.57	2.49	2.47	2.44	2.43	2.51	2.46	0.05	0.612
Posture transition (sitting-lying)^1),3),4),8)	2.18	2.56	2.49	2.48	2.43	2.41	2.52	2.47	0.04	0.613
Biting^{1),2),3),4),5),7),8)}	0.65^b	0.74^a	0.66^b	0.68^ab	0.64^b	0.67^ab	0.69^ab	0.70^ab	0.01	0.014

Contrast: NC vs PC (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Other treatments (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Essential oil vs Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Essential oil vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Means with different letters are significantly differ (p < 0.05) or tend to differ (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10).

Download Excel Table

Table 6. Effects of dosage level of phytogenic feed additives on behavior changes in finishing pigs with stressed by stocking density

Items	NC	High stocking density							SEM	p-value
Items	NC	PC	ES1 (0.05%)	ES2 (0.10%)	CES1 (0.10%)	CES2 (0.20%)	GP1 (0.04%)	GP2 (0.08%)	SEM	p-value
Basic behavior (min/hour)
Feed intake^{1),3),4),5),6),8)}	4.92^a	4.71^b	4.97^a	4.93^a	4.95^a	5.01^a	4.94^a	4.98^a	0.02	< 0.001
Standing^1),4),5),6)	6.44^a	6.01^b	6.03^b	6.14^ab	6.27^ab	6.20^ab	6.40^a	6.21^ab	0.04	0.002
Lying^{1),3),4),5)6),7)}	45.10^c	45.68^a	45.46^ab	45.35^bc	45.15^bc	45.18^bc	45.17^bc	45.28^bc	0.04	< 0.001
Sitting^{1),5),6),7),8)}	3.53	3.60	3.54	3.58	3.63	3.61	3.50	3.54	0.01	0.950
Singularity behavior (count/hour)
Drink water⁵⁾	5.66	5.64	5.52	5.70	5.61	5.65	5.56	5.69	0.03	0.712
Rooting^{2),3),4),5),7)}	1.41	1.27	1.43	1.30	1.34	1.47	1.45	1.40	0.02	0.231
Posture transition (lying-sitting)^{1),4),5),6),7)}	2.68	2.40	2.33	2.44	2.56	2.56	2.54	2.57	0.04	0.471
Posture transition (sitting-lying)^{1),4),5),6),7)}	2.67	2.39	2.33	2.45	2.55	2.57	2.52	2.56	0.05	0.716
Biting^{1),2),3),4),5),6),7),8)}	0.84	0.92	0.91	0.88	0.84	0.83	0.85	0.87	0.01	0.060

Contrast: NC vs PC (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Other treatments (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: PC vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Essential oil vs Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Essential oil vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Contrast: Mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil vs Grape pomace extract (p < 0.05).

Means with different letters are significantly differ (p < 0.05) or tend to differ (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10).

Download Excel Table

Fig. 1. Classification of pig behavior changes. A, feed intake; B, standing; C, lying, D, sitting; E, drink water; F, rooting; G, post transition (standing → lying); H, post transition (lying → standing); I, bitting.

Download Original Figure

During finishing pig period (week 8), PC group significantly decreased (p < 0.05) feed intake time and significantly increased (p < 0.05) lying time than NC group. Supplementation of PFA groups significantly increased (p < 0.05) feed intake time than PC group and similar with NC group. CES, GP group significantly decreased (p < 0.05) lying time than PC group and similar with NC group. In singularity behavior, there are no significant (p > 0.05) result showed. PC group showed a tendency to increased frequency of biting compared to other groups (0.05 < p < 0.10) and rooting also showed an increasing contrasting effect.

DISCUSSION

Pigs are social animals and live together in cages. However, as stated in the EU, pigs should be prohibited from being kept at excessive stocking densities for protection and optimal growth of pigs [13]. A high stocking density is known to impede the movement of pigs due to limited space. It also makes them become competitive. However, because of the profit on the farm, the optimal stocking density is not kept. Therefore, we experimented with the use of various dosages of PFA to mitigate the negative effects of high stocking density.

Due to the negative effect of high stocking density, growth performance (ADG and ADFI) is reduced compared to pigs raised with an optimal density considering animal welfare [14]. High stocking density can induce a high-temperature environment, making pigs increase heat loss and decrease heat production to remain homoeothermic [15]. Many studies have reported that eating, digestion, and absorption of nutrients can generate heat energy [16]. Thus, pigs exposed to high temperatures reduced heat by decreasing feed intake and increasing water intake [16,17]. Similarly, our study revealed decreases of ADG by 35%, ADFI by 17%, G:F ratio by 12% during growing period with decreases of ADG by 18% and G:F ratio by 16% during the finishing period in pigs under high stocking density than in pigs under optimal density considering animal welfare. The differences according to the additive dosage level were shown in a mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil groups (CES). During finishing periods, CES1 showed similar feed efficiency with CES2, but significantly increased in BW (6.60%). Because additives change the flavor by changing the compounds in the feed [18,19]. So, CES2 ADFI was reduced (9.97%) than CES1 which also affected ADG (11.19%). Therefore, it can be seen that increasing the amount of feed additive doesn’t make increasing growth performance [20,21].

The goal of pig production in the pig industry is to grow pigs quickly and healthily. Pigs under optimal density considering animal welfare and pigs under high stocking density fed with PFA showed similar feed efficiency (i.e., NC: 0.45, T3: 0.44), although their weights were numerically different (i.e., NC: 121.19 kg, T3: 115.13 kg). Stress caused by a high stocking density was associated with a decrease in feed intake [3]. Therefore, growth performance improvement with the addition of PFA under a high stocking situation was due to improved nutrient digestibility, not feed intake. Also, the relationship between PFA addition dosage level and growth performance does not increase proportionally. Consequently, it appeared that PFA could mitigate the negative effect of high stocking density on growth performance, although it could not completely offset such negative effects.

The frequency of diarrhea at high stocking density was increased during growing periods (i.e., NC: 0.36; PC: 0.88). However, there was no diarrhea during finishing periods. Under high stocking density, pigs exposed to heat stress show decreased intestinal integrity and immunity with a reduced digestive capacity [22,23]. The lower immunity causes an inflammatory response, which destroys the integrity of the intestine, increases gut permeability, impairs the absorptive functionality of the intestine, and causes diarrhea [24]. To reduce diarrhea, feed additives can be used to promote intestinal development [25]. In our study, the use of PFA in a high stocking density condition decreased diarrhea to a level similar to that of pigs raised under optimal density considering animal welfare. Several previous studies have reported that citrus compounds, essential oils, and grape pomace used in our experiments could reduce diarrhea [26-28]. The reason why diarrhea showed high frequency only during the growing period, but not during the finishing period, might be because the immune system is more complete as pigs grow with the improvement of intestinal health. In addition, there was no significant difference in the frequency of diarrhea according to the dosage of the additive, although there was a numerical difference in that the frequency of diarrhea decreased as the dosage of the additive decreased (i.e., Normal dosage compared to double dosage: ES group decreased 31.25%, CES1 group decreased 5.26%, GP group decreased 9.09%).

Increasing stocking density negatively affected nutrient digestibility in our whole study. Actually, many studies have shown that high stocking density can reduce nutrient digestibility [29,30]. In our study, PFA addition increased the digestibility of DM and CP during the week 2 and the digestibility of DM, CP, and GE during the week 8 than non-PFA addition. The increase in nutrient digestibility of pigs fed with PFA showed the same result as a decrease in the frequency of diarrhea. This nutrient digestibility improvement might be due to the stimulation of saccharase, amylase, and phosphatase activities [31]. Nutrient digestibility under high stocking density recovered more during finishing phase than during the growing phase in our study. The effect can be seen as an increase in immunity and resistance to intestinal disease due to the development of the digestive system as pigs grow [32]. In particular, it can be seen that the week 2 CES1 group and the week 8 CES groups in which a mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil were added returned to NC level. Both bitter citrus extract and essential oil are composed of phenolics known to possess antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory activities. They can improve gut health and immunity. When fed with phenolic compounds, fermentation in the feed occurs well, leading to changes in the intestinal surface area and increased nutrient absorption due to digestive enzyme activity [33]. The DM and GE digestibility of CES2 increased sharply (i.e. DM: 1.98%; GE: 4.61%) at week 8 compared to week 2. It appears that PFA is more effective when it is supplied in long-term [34]. However, there are not many studies on feeding dosage levels of PFA under high stocking density. Thus, more research is needed. The reason why the nutrient digestibility of grape pomace extract added groups (GP1, GP2) was increased, although it did not recover to the NC group level due to saponin, an anti-nutrient in animal diets [35].

Immunity and health status can be reduced when stress is not well managed. Excessive stressors can increase the concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to lipid peroxidation and oxidative damage to cell membranes. Lack of sufficient antioxidants to eliminate ROS will lead to oxidative damage and inflammation [36]. In addition, stress can induce the production of various inflammatory cytokines by activating the immune system of the gastrointestinal tract, an immune organ that constitutes more than 70% of nutrient metabolism and immune cells in the body. In fact, in our experiment, the intestinal environment deteriorated in high stocking density compared to that under optimal density considering animal welfare (i.e. Fecal score decreased by 59.09%). Thus, the frequency of diarrhea was increased, the nutrient digestibility was lowered, and the growth performance was impaired.

Several studies have reported worsening blood profiles due to stress [35,37]. Immune markers TNF-α and IL-6 are decreased under stress. Under stressful conditions, pro-inflammatory cytokines are secreted to promote cortisol secretion and suppress growth hormone secretion [38]. Excessive pro-inflammatory cytokines can induce fever, inflammation, tissue destruction [39], shock, and even death in some cases [40]. In the current study, there was no significant difference in blood profile according to the concentration of stocking density except for week 8 TNF-α (i.e. NC: 22.77; PC: 78.67). However, the addition of PFA alleviated negative results of some blood parameters (week 2 WBC and week 2 cortisol). Among pro-inflammatory cytokines, compared to PC group treatment, IL-6 decreased in the GP2 group at the week 2, and TNF-α decreased in the CES, GP groups in the week 8. The reason for the decrease is that thymol, one of the components of essential oil, has anti-inflammatory action. It can reduce the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines [41]. It can also inhibit the maturation of dendritic cells and activation of T-cell proliferation, which play a major role in promoting immune responses in vitro. Another ingredient, carvacrol, has high antioxidant properties. The hydroxyl group (OH⁻) connected to the aromatic ring can accumulate free radicals to reduce tissue damage and cell function. Carvacrol, an antioxidant, has a antioxidant activity to protect cells [42]. Grape phenolic compounds can trap and destroy free radicals with antioxidant properties. Grape seed polyphenols are very sensitive to oxygen, light, acids, and alkalis, but relatively less sensitive to heat. Therefore, grape phenol compounds are effective against heat stress caused by high stocking density [43].

Stocking density can increase the frequency of contact, thus increasing social tension and aggression [4,44]. It can also increase heat production per area, which can boost thermal stress [3]. High stocking density is known to cause heat exhaustion, which can increase sweating, panting, and water demand, which in turn can increase water intake [45]. However, in our study, the NC group with the least heat stress had the most water intake than the PC group (growing period: 1.94%; finishing period: 0.35%). More research is needed in the future to clarify this. Aggression is a sign of competition for controlling a resource of special significance [46]. Several studies have shown that heat stress increases the lying and aggressive behavior of pigs [47,48]. Our study showed similar results. During the finishing period, the PC group of pigs tended to spend more time lying down (1.29%) with more aggressive biting (9.52%) compared to pigs in the NC group. Supplementation of PFA reduced the lying time to a level similar to that of the NC group. During the growing period, the PC group (0.74 count/hour) showed an increased number of bites compared to the NC group (0.65 count/hour) and the CES1 group (0.64 count/hour) showed fewer number of bites with a level similar to the NC group. In the current study, growth performance increased with PFA supplementation. Going to the feeder is related to feed intake, which affects BW, ADG, ADFI, and G:F ratio. Both grower and finisher showed reduced feed intake times due to the stress of competition in the feeder. In particular, if a mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil (CES) were added during the growing period, the feed intake time was similar to that of the NC group (i.e. CES1: 4.46 min/hour; CES2: 4.49 min/hour NC: 4.55 min/hour). This might be because a mixture of essential oil and bitter citrus extract reduced oxidative stress due to their powerful antioxidant effects. It has also been reported that the addition of essential oils can improve the negative behavior of rats [49]. Therefore, the most effective way to deal with aggression is to add 0.10% of essential oil and citrus. Pearce and Paterson [50] have reported that pigs’ immobile sitting or standing in confined spaces is a way to cope with crowded stress. During the finishing period, the NC group coped well with stress by standing longer than the PC group in the present study. Thus, the increase in the frequency of aggressive behavior might be due to the sharper decrease in stocking density during the more extended period in finishing period than growing period.

CONCLUSION

Our goal in this experiment was to verify the effects of various plant feed additives with dosage levels in pigs induced by environmental stress. Pigs have high stress levels, weakened immunity, and reduced growth performance in high stocking density situations. However, the addition of bitter citrus extract and essential oils mitigated the negative effects of high stocking density. Also, the relationship between PFA addition dosage level and growth performance does not increase proportionally. In summary, the negative effect of high stocking density was most effectively mitigated by the normal dosage of a mixture of bitter citrus extract and essential oil additive (CES1).

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01622001)” Rural Development administration, Korea. This work was conducted during the research year of Chungbuk National University in 2020.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Cho HA, Song MH, Lee JH, Kim HB, Cho JH.

Data curation: Cho HA, Song MH, Lee JH.

Formal analysis: Cho HA, Song MH, Lee JH.

Investigation: Oh HJ, Kim YJ, An JW, Chang SY, GO YB, Song DC, Cho SY, Kim DJ, Kim MS, Park HR.

Writing - original draft: Cho HA, Song MH, Lee JH.

Writing - review & editing: Cho HA, Song MH, Lee JH, Oh HJ, Kim YJ, An JW, Chang SY, GO YB, Song DC, Cho SY, Kim DJ, Kim MS, Park HR, Kim HB, Cho JH.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experimental protocol for this study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea (approval CBNUA-1642-21-02).

REFERENCES

Guise HJ, Riches HL, Hunter EJ, Jones TA, Warriss PD, Kettlewell PJ. The effect of stocking density in transit on the carcass quality and welfare of slaughter pigs: 1. Carcass measurements. Meat Sci. 1998; 50:439-46

Feddes JJ, Emmanuel EJ, Zuidhoft MJ. Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poult Sci. 2002; 81:774-9

Bilal RM, Hassan FU, Farag MR, Nasir TA, Ragni M, Mahgoub HA, et al. Thermal stress and high stocking densities in poultry farms: potential effects and mitigation strategies. J Therm Biol. 2021; 99:102944

Hemsworth PH, Rice M, Nash J, Giri K, Butler KL, Tilbrook AJ, et al. Effects of group size and floor space allowance on grouped sows: aggression, stress, skin injuries, and reproductive performance. J Anim Sci. 2013; 91:4953-64

Estévez M. Oxidative damage to poultry: from farm to fork. Poult Sci. 2015; 94:1368-78

Greene ES, Cauble R, Kadhim H, de Almeida Mallmann B, Gu I, Lee SO, et al. Protective effects of the phytogenic feed additive “comfort” on growth performance via modulation of hypothalamic feeding- and drinking-related neuropeptides in cyclic heat-stressed broilers. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2021; 74:106487

Casal-Plana N, Manteca X, Dalmau A, Fàbrega E. Influence of enrichment material and herbal compounds in the behaviour and performance of growing pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2017; 195:38-43

Chang SY, Song MH, Lee JH, Oh HJ, Kim YJ, An JW, et al. Phytogenic feed additives alleviate pathogenic Escherichia coli-induced intestinal damage through improving barrier integrity and inhibiting inflammation in weaned pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2022; 13:107

NRC [National Research Council]. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th rev. ed Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2012; p p. 208-38

10.

Marquardt RR, Jin LZ, Kim JW, Fang L, Frohlich AA, Baidoo SK. Passive protective effect of egg-yolk antibodies against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88+ infection in neonatal and early-weaned piglets. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1999; 23:283-8

11.

AOAC [Association of Official Analytical Collaboration] International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 21st ed Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International. 2019

12.

Yang KY, Jeon JH, Kwon KS, Choi HC, Ha JJ, Kim JB, et al. Classification of behavior at the signs of parturition of sows by image information analysis. J Korea Acad Ind Soc. 2018; 19:607-13

13.

European Union. Council directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs (codified version). Off J Eur Union. 2009; L47:5-13

14.

Carpenter CB, Holder CJ, Wu F, Woodworth JC, DeRouchey JM, Tokach MD, et al. Effects of increasing space allowance by removing a pig or gate adjustment on finishing pig growth performance. J Anim Sci. 2018; 96:2659-64

15.

Collin A, van Milgent J, Le Dividich J. Modelling the effect of high, constant temperature on food intake in young growing pigs. Anim Sci. 2001; 72:519-27

16.

Song R, Foster DN, Shurson GC. Effects of feeding diets containing bacitracin methylene disalicylate to heat-stressed finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2011; 89:1830-43

17.

Hyun Y, Ellis M, Curtis SE, Johnson RW. Environmental temperature, space allowance, and regrouping: additive effects of multiple concurrent stressors in growing pigs. J Swine Health Prod. 2005; 13:131-8

18.

Perdok H, Langhout P, van Vugt P. Stimulating appetite for AGP-free success. Feed Mix. 2003; 11:10-3

19.

Isabel B, Santos Y. Effects of dietary organic acids and essential oils on growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. J Appl Poult Res. 2009; 18:472-6

20.

Ebrahimi A, Qotbi AAA, Seidavi A, Laudadio V, Tufarelli V. Effect of different levels of dried sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel on broiler chickens growth performance Abbas. Arch Anim Breed. 2013; 56:11-7

21.

Su G, Zhou X, Wang Y, Chen D, Chen G, Li Y, et al. Effects of plant essential oil supplementation on growth performance, immune function and antioxidant activities in weaned pigs. Lipids Health Dis. 2018; 17:139

22.

Pearce SC, Mani V, Boddicker RL, Johnson JS, Weber TE, Ross JW, et al. Heat stress reduces barrier function and alters intestinal metabolism in growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2012; 90:257-9

23.

Jeong Y, Choi Y, Kim D, Min Y, Cho E, Kim J. Effects of cooling systems on physiological responses and intestinal microflora in early gestating sows exposed to high-temperature stress. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021; 63:904-18

24.

Moeser AJ, Blikslager AT. Mechanisms of porcine diarrheal disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007; 231:56-67

25.

Kim JC, Hansen CF, Mullan BP, Pluske JR. Nutrition and pathology of weaner pigs: nutritional strategies to support barrier function in the gastrointestinal tract. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2012; 173:3-16

26.

Tian Q, Piao X. Essential oil blend could decrease diarrhea prevalence by improving antioxidative capability for weaned pigs. Animals. 2019; 9:847

27.

Han M, Song P, Huang C, Rezaei A, Farrar S, Brown MA, et al. Dietary grape seed proanthocyanidins (GSPs) improve weaned intestinal microbiota and mucosal barrier using a piglet model. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:80313-26

28.

Uerlings J, Arévalo Sureda E, Schroyen M, Kroeske K, Tanghe S, De Vos M, et al. Impact of citrus pulp or inulin on intestinal microbiota and metabolites, barrier, and immune function of weaned piglets. Front Nutr. 2021; 8:650211

29.

Leek ABG, Sweeney BT, Duffy P, Beattie VE, O’Doherty JV. The effect of stocking density and social regrouping stressors on growth performance, carcass characteristics, nutrient digestibility and physiological stress responses in pigs. Anim Sci. 2004; 79:109-19

30.

Zhang ZF, Li J, Park JC, Kim IH. Effect of vitamin levels and different stocking densities on performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood characteristics of growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013; 26:241-6

31.

Seven İ, Aksu T, Seven PT. The effects of propolis and vitamin C supplemented feed on performance, nutrient utilization and carcass characteristics in broilers exposed to lead. Livest Sci. 2012; 148:10-5

32.

Nousiainen J, Setälä J. Lactic acid bacteria as animal probiotics.In In: Salminen S, von Wright A, editors.editors Lactic acid bacteria. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker. 1993; p p. 315-56

33.

Valenzuela-Grijalva NV, Pinelli-Saavedra A, Muhlia-Almazan A, Domínguez-Díaz D, González-Ríos H. Dietary inclusion effects of phytochemicals as growth promoters in animal production. J Anim Sci Technol. 2017; 59:8

34.

Bartoš P, Dolan A, Smutný L, Šístková M, Celjak I, Šoch M, et al. Effects of phytogenic feed additives on growth performance and on ammonia and greenhouse gases emissions in growing-finishing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2016; 212:143-8

35.

Franz CM, Baser KHC, Hahn-Ramssl I. Herbs and aromatic plants as feed additives: aspects of composition, safety, and registration rules.In In: Florou-Paneri P, Christaki E, Giannenas I, editors.editors Feed additives. London: Academic Press. 2020; p p. 35-56

36.

Christaki E, Giannenas I, Bonos E, Florou-Paneri P. Innovative uses of aromatic plants as natural supplements in nutrition.In In: Florou-Paneri P, Christaki E, Giannenas I, editors.editors Feed additives. London: Academic Press. 2020; p p. 19-34

37.

Singh NM, Singh LA, Kumari LV, Kadirvel G, Patir M. Effect of supplementation of molasses (Saccharum officinarum) on growth performance and cortisol profile of growing pig in north eastern hill ecosystem of India. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2020; 8:302-5

38.

Fan J, Molina PE, Gelato MC, Lang CH. Differential tissue regulation of insulin-like growth factor-I content and binding proteins after endotoxin. Endocrinology. 1994; 134:1685-92

39.

Murtaugh MP, Baarsch MJ, Zhou Y, Scamurra RW, Lin G. Inflammatory cytokines in animal health and disease. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1996; 54:45-55

40.

Dinarello CA. Proinflammatory cytokines. Chest. 2000; 118:503-8

41.

Jiang XR, Awati A, Agazzi A, Vitari F, Ferrari A, Bento H, et al. Effects of a blend of essential oils and an enzyme combination on nutrient digestibility, ileum histology and expression of inflammatory mediators in weaned piglets. Animal. 2015; 9:417-26

42.

Aeschbach R, Löliger J, Scott BC, Murcia A, Butler J, Halliwell B, et al. Antioxidant actions of thymol, carvacrol, 6-gingerol, zingerone and hydroxytyrosol. Food Chem Toxicol. 1994; 32:31-6

43.

Turner SP, Ewen M, Rooke JA, Edwards SA. The effect of space allowance on performance, aggression and immune competence of growing pigs housed on straw deep-litter at different group sizes. Livest Prod Sci. 2000; 66:47-55

44.

Olsson K, Josäter-Hermelin M, Hossaini-Hilali J, Hydbring E, Dahlborn K. Heat stress causes excessive drinking in fed and food deprived pregnant goats. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol. 1995; 110:309-17

45.

Phillips C. The welfare risks and impacts of heat stress on sheep shipped from Australia to the Middle East. Vet J. 2016; 218:78-85

46.

Georgiev AV, Klimczuk ACE, Traficonte DM, Maestripieri D. When violence pays: a cost-benefit analysis of aggressive behavior in animals and humans. Evol Psychol. 2013; 11:678-99

47.

Schütz KE, Rogers AR, Poulouin YA, Cox NR, Tucker CB. The amount of shade influences the behavior and physiology of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93:125-33

48.

Camp Montoro J, Boyle LA, Solà-Oriol D, Muns R, Gasa J, Garcia Manzanilla E. Effect of space allowance and mixing on growth performance and body lesions of grower-finisher pigs in pens with a single wet-dry feeder. Porc Health Manag. 2021; 7:7

49.

Sánchez-Vidaña DI, Po KKT, Fung TKH, Chow JKW, Lau WKW, So PK, et al. Lavender essential oil ameliorates depression-like behavior and increases neurogenesis and dendritic complexity in rats. Neurosci Lett. 2019; 701:180-92

50.

Pearce GP, Paterson AM. The effect of space restriction and provision of toys during rearing on the behaviour, productivity and physiology of male pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1993; 36:11-28