Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of stocking density and dietary vitamin C on performance, meat quality, intestinal permeability, and stress indicators in broiler chickens

Dong Gwon Yu1,#https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9606-0590, Nyun Namgung1,#https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8813-5545, Jong Hyuk Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0289-2949, Seung Yeon Won1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8311-3371, Won Jun Choi1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4000-990X, Dong Yong Kil1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9297-849X
1Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea
*Corresponding author: Dong Yong Kil, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea. Tel: +82-31-670-3028, E-mail: dongyong@cau.ac.kr

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

© Copyright 2021 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 23, 2021; Revised: May 16, 2021; Accepted: May 17, 2021

Published Online: Jul 31, 2021

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to investigate the effects of stocking density (SD) and dietary supplementation of vitamin C on growth performance, meat quality, intestinal permeability, and stress indicators in broiler chickens. The study was conducted using a completely randomized design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement consisting of 2 different SD and 2 supplemental levels of dietary vitamin C. A total of 1,368 Ross 308 broiler chickens of 21 days of age with similar body weights (BW) were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatments with 6 replicates each. Different numbers of birds per identical floor pen (2.0 m × 2.4 m) were used to create 2 different SD levels of low SD (9 birds/m2) and high SD (18 birds/m2). The basal diet was formulated with no supplemental vitamin C to meet or exceed nutrient recommendations of the Ross 308 manual. The other diet was prepared by supplementing 200 mg/kg vitamin C in the basal diet. The study lasted for 14 days. At the end of the study, 3 male birds per replicate were selected to analyze meat quality, intestinal permeability, and stress indicators such as blood heterophil:lymphocyte (H:L) and feather corticosterone (CORT) concentrations. Results indicated that there were no interactions between different SD and dietary supplementation of vitamin C for all measurements. For the main effects of SD, birds raised at high SD had less (p < 0.01) BW, BW gain, and feed intake with increasing stress responses including greater blood H:L and feather CORT concentrations (p < 0.01) than those raised at low SD. Transepithelial electrical resistance in the jejunal mucosa was decreased (p < 0.05) at high SD, indicating an increase in intestinal permeability. However, the main effects of dietary supplementation of 200 mg/kg vitamin C were insignificant for all measurements. In conclusion, high SD of broiler chickens impairs growth performance and intestinal barrier function with increasing stress responses. However, dietary supplementation of vitamin C may have little beneficial effects on broiler chickens raised at the high SD condition used in the present study.

Keywords: Broiler chicken; Dietary vitamin C; Growth performance; Intestinal permeability; Stress indicator; Stocking density

INTRODUCTION

Stocking density (SD) is one of important concerns in broiler production because of its direct relationship with the productive performance, health, and welfare of broiler chickens [1]. It is expected that increasing SD of broiler chickens increases chicken meat production per defined space [2]. However, high SD has been frequently associated with decreased productive performance and health of broiler chickens [3]. Several studies have been performed to develop dietary interventions that alleviate the negative impacts of high SD on broiler chickens [46]; however, the results are not promising.

Vitamin C is a potent biological antioxidant and several animal studies have suggested that dietary supplementation of vitamin C is effective in decreasing the oxidative stress of animals raised under various stressful conditions [7,8]. However, dietary supplementation of vitamin C is not widely practiced in the poultry industry because poultry is believed to synthesize sufficient amounts of vitamin C in the body [9]. Despite the ability of chickens in producing endogenous vitamin C, the requirement or synthetic capacity of vitamin C may alter due to various factors such as individual differentiation, breeds, health status, and environment [10], which may result in possible extra requirements in poultry. One of the most-well known environmental factors increasing the demand for supplemental vitamin C in diets is heat stress. Several previous studies have reported that dietary supplementation of vitamin C ameliorated the adverse effect of heat stress on broiler performance and health [1113]. However, although high SD is also considered a critical stressor, there are few studies on the interactive effect of high SD and dietary vitamin C on productive performance and health of broiler chickens.

Therefore, the objective of the current study was to investigate the effects of SD and dietary supplementation of vitamin C on growth performance, meat quality, intestinal permeability, and stress indicators in broiler chickens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals, experimental design, and diets

The experimental protocol of the current study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Chung-Ang University (IACUC approval no. 2019-00086). The study was performed using a completely randomized design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement consisting of 2 different SD and 2 supplemental levels of dietary vitamin C. A total of 1,368 mixed-sex Ross 308 broiler chickens (1:1 ratio of males and females) of 21 days of age with similar body weights (BW) were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatments with 6 replicates each. The study lasted for 14 days from 21 to 35 days of age. The experimental period was determined based on the fact that growing chickens are more sensitive to high SD than young chickens [14,15]. Different numbers of birds per floor pen were used to create 2 different SD levels, namely low SD (9 birds/m2) and high SD (18 birds/m2) as reported in our previous study [6]. The final floor space (4.216 m2) was calculated by subtracting the space of immobile objects (0.584 m2 for 2 feeders and 1 bell-shaped drinker per pen) from the floor space (2.0 m × 2.4 m). Each floor pen was covered with a 10-cm thick layer of rice hulls. The commercial-type basal diet was prepared without dietary supplementation of vitamin C as the control group (Table 1). The nutrient and energy concentrations in the basal diet were formulated to meet or exceed nutrient recommendations of the Ross 308 manual [16]. Vitamin C (> 970 g/kg coated vitamin C, Zhejiang Mingzhu Animal Health Products, Hangzhou, China) was then supplemented to the basal diet at the inclusion level of 200 mg/kg. The supplemental level of dietary vitamin C was determined based on previous studies reporting that the beneficial effect of supplemental vitamin C in broiler diets was observed at 200 mg/kg [12,18].

Table 1. Ingredients and nutrient composition of the basal diet and experimental diet
Items Basal diet
Ingredients (%)
 Corn 58.73
 Soybean meal (46% crude protein) 24.47
 Corn gluten meal 5.77
 Tallow 5.55
 Salt 0.20
 Monodicalcium phosphate 1.48
 Limestone 1.20
DL-Methionine (85%) 0.32
L-Lysine-HCl (50%) 0.58
L-Threonine (98.5%) 0.10
 Choline (50%) 0.10
 NaHCO3 0.10
 Vitamin premix1) 0.10
 Mineral premix2) 0.10
 Celite3) 1.20
 Total 100.00
Calculated energy and nutrient content4)
 AMEn (kcal/kg) 3,200
 Crude protein (%) 19.54
 Lysine (%) 1.16
 Methionine + cysteine (%) 0.91
 Threonine (%) 0.83
 Tryptophan (%) 0.21
 Calcium (%) 0.79
 Available phosphorus (%) 0.40

Provided per kilogram of the complete diet: vitamin A, 12,000 IU; vitamin D3, 4,000 IU; vitamin E, 80 IU; vitamin K3, 4 mg; vitamin B1, 4 mg; vitamin B2, 10 mg; vitamin B6, 6 mg; vitamin B12, 20 μg; biotin, 0.2 mg; vitamin B5, 20 mg; folic acid, 2 mg; niacin, 60 mg; antioxidant, 2 mg.

Provided per kilogram of the complete diet: zinc, 100 mg; manganese, 120 mg; iron, 60 mg; copper, 16 mg; cobalt, 1 mg; iodine, 1.25 mg; selenium, 0.3 mg.

Vitamin C (Vitamin C coated 970 g/kg, Zhejiang Mingzhu Animal Health Products, Hangzhou, China) was added at the level of 200 mg/kg in replace of celite.

Calculated values from NRC and Ross 308 manual [16,17].

AMEn, nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy.

Download Excel Table

Before the initiation of the study, all chickens were raised under the same environmental conditions and were fed the same commercial starter and grower diets for 20 days. Experimental diets and water were provided ad libitum for 14 days. All experimental pens were placed in an environmentally controlled room. The average room temperature was maintained at 22.3 ± 2.5℃ during overall experimental period. The study was performed under 24-hour lighting conditions. Body weight gain (BWG) and feed intake (FI) were recorded at the end of the study. Feed efficiency (FE) was calculated as BWG divided by FI after adjusting for mortality [19].

Sample collection

At the end of the study, 3 male birds with a BW close to average BW in each replicated pen were selected. One bird was used to analyze stress indicators including blood heterophil (H):lymphocyte (L) and the concentrations of corticosterone (CORT) in the feather. The remaining 2 birds were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation. One bird was used for analyzing breast meat quality and liver antioxidant status, whereas the other bird was used for analyzing intestinal permeability in the jejunum by a Ussing chamber.

Analysis of stress indicators

Blood samples were collected from wing veins. Blood H:L was analyzed using the method of Lentfer et al. [20] with a minor modification. Briefly, a standard microscope slide with approximately 7 μL of blood was prepared and dried at room temperature. The slides were then prefixed for 5 minutes after immersion in methanol. Afterwards, the slides were stained with 0.2 mL wright stain solution (Wright stain solution, Muto pure chemicals, Tokyo, Japan) for 2 minutes at room temperature and then rinsed with water until the edges of the slides turned pinkish red. The slides were again stained with 0.2 mL giemsa stain (Giemsa’s staining solution, Duksan pure chemicals, Ansan, Korea) for 5 minutes at room temperature and then rinsed with water until the edges of the slides turned pinkish red. After air drying, the hemocyte smears were inspected under a microscope. Blood H and L were counted by the same 2 people to 100 cells per individual smear and blood H:L was calculated based on the method of Cengiz et al. [21].

Feather samples were collected from the same birds used for blood H:L analysis. The primary flight feathers were collected and stored at −80°C before analysis. Feather CORT concentrations were analyzed using the method of Bortolotti et al. [22] with a minor modification [23]. In short, feathers without calamus were minced into pieces of < 5 mm2 by scissors. Feather pieces were placed in 50-mL tubes with 10 mL methanol (HPLC grade, Honeywell, NC, USA). The tubes were sonicated in a water bath at room temperature for 30 minutes, and then incubated in a shaking water bath at 50°C overnight. The methanol was then separated from the remaining feather by syringe filters (HyunDai Micro, Anseong, Korea) in a filtration funnel. The feather remnants were washed twice again with 2 mL methanol and the washes were added back to the original extract. The methanol extract was then concentrated by evaporation in a water bath at 50°C for 7 hours. The extract residues were mixed with 1 mL phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), and centrifuged at 17,900×g for 15 minutes. The resulting extracts were used for analyzing feather CORT concentrations with a CORT competitive ELISA kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The feather CORT concentrations were expressed as a function of feather length (pg/mm).

Meat quality and liver antioxidant status

Both sides of the breast muscle were excised to measure meat quality and stored at 4°C until further analysis. The right portion was used for pH and meat color assays, whereas the left portion was used to determine water holding capacity (WHC) and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance (TBARS) values. The detailed procedure of the meat quality analysis was reported previously [6].

Antioxidant status in the liver such as malondialdehyde (MDA) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was determined using a commercially available OxiSelectTM TBARS assay Kit (MDA Quantitation, STA-330, Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA, USA) and OxiSelectTM Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) Assay Kit (STA-360, Cell Biolabs), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Protein concentrations were also analyzed using a commercial kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) [24]. The relative concentrations of MDA and TAC to protein concentrations were calculated and expressed as µmol/mg and U/mg protein, respectively [25].

Intestinal permeability

Intestinal permeability in the jejunal mucosa as a measure of intestinal barrier function was determined based on the transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) values measured in a dual-channel self-contained Ussing chamber system (U2500, Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT, USA). The detailed procedure was reported previously [6].

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA as a completely randomized design using the PROC MIXED procedure (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Each replicate was considered an experimental unit. The statistical model included SD, dietary supplementation of vitamin C, and their interaction. The LSMEANS procedure was used to calculate treatment means and the PDIFF option in SAS was used to separate the means if the difference was significant. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Growth performance

During 14 days of the study (from 21 to 35 days of age), no interaction between different SD and dietary supplementation of 200 mg/kg vitamin C was observed for growth performance of broiler chickens (Table 2). For the main effects, birds raised at high SD had less (p < 0.01) BW, BWG, and FI than those raised at low SD, whereas dietary supplementation of vitamin C had no effects on growth performance of broiler chickens, regardless of SD.

Table 2. Effects of stocking density (SD) and dietary supplementation of vitamin C (Vit C) on growth performance of broiler chickens
Treatment Growth performance
SD (birds/m2) Vit C (mg/kg) IBW (g) FBW (g) BWG (g) FI (g) FE (g/kg)
9 0 614 1,586 972 1,633 596
200 613 1,555 942 1,633 577
18 0 614 1,481 867 1,476 587
200 613 1,465 852 1,470 580
SEM (n = 6) 1.5 22.4 22.4 31.4 8.3
Main effect
 SD (birds/m2)
  9 613 1,570 957 1,633 586
  18 613 1,473 860 1,473 583
 SEM (n = 12) 1.1 15.8 15.8 22.2 5.9
 Vit C (mg/kg)
  0 613 1,533 920 1,554 592
  200 613 1,510 897 1,551 578
 SEM (n = 12) 1.1 15.8 15.8 22.2 5.9
Effect (p-value) df
SD 1 0.98 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.73
Vit C 1 0.52 0.31 0.33 0.93 0.13
SD × Vit C 1 0.71 0.74 0.76 0.93 0.53

IBW, initial body weight; FBW, final body weight; BWG, body weight gain; FI, feed intake; FE, feed efficiency.

Download Excel Table
Stress indicators

There was no interaction between SD and dietary supplementation of 200 mg/kg vitamin C for blood H:L and feather CORT concentrations (Table 3). However, birds raised at high SD had greater (p < 0.01) blood H:L and feather CORT concentrations than those raised at low SD. Dietary supplementation of 200 mg/kg vitamin C had no effects on blood H:L and feather CORT concentrations, regardless of SD.

Table 3. Effects of stocking density (SD) and dietary supplementation of vitamin C (Vit C) on stress indicators of broiler chickens
Treatment Stress indicators
SD (birds/m2) Vit C (mg/kg) Blood H:L Feather CORT concentrations (pg/mm)
9 0 0.40 9.2
200 0.40 10.3
18 0 0.83 18.5
200 0.75 17.6
SEM (n = 6) 0.038 0.96
Main effect
 SD (birds/m2)
  9 0.40 9.8
  18 0.79 18.0
 SEM (n = 12) 0.027 0.68
 Vit C (mg/kg)
  0 0.61 13.8
  200 0.57 14.0
 SEM (n = 12) 0.027 0.68
Effect (p-value) df
SD 1 < 0.01 < 0.01
Vit C 1 0.30 0.91
SD × Vit C 1 0.29 0.31

CORT, corticosterone; H:L, heterophil:lymphocyte.

Download Excel Table
Meat quality and liver antioxidant status

No interaction between SD and dietary supplementation of 200 mg/kg vitamin C was observed for breast meat quality (Table 4) and antioxidant status such as MDA and TAC concentrations in the liver (Table 5). In addition, there were no main effects of SD and dietary supplementation of vitamin C on meat quality and antioxidant status in the liver.

Table 4. Effects of stocking density (SD) and dietary supplementation of vitamin C (Vit C) on breast meat quality of broiler chickens
Treatment Breast meat quality
SD (birds/m2) Vit C (mg/kg) Yield (%) pH (1 h) pH (24 h) WHC (%) CIE L* CIE a* CIE b* TBARS
9 0 16.78 6.38 5.69 69.41 44.72 3.48 12.68 0.45
200 16.69 6.29 5.75 69.38 42.98 4.27 12.68 0.43
18 0 15.84 6.28 5.72 73.24 43.02 4.11 12.00 0.43
200 16.33 6.40 5.74 68.51 43.63 3.38 11.84 0.44
SEM (n = 6) 0.466 0.066 0.042 1.458 0.888 0.467 0.427 0.010
Main effect
 SD (birds/m2)
  9 16.73 6.33 5.72 69.39 43.85 3.87 12.68 0.44
  18 16.09 6.34 5.73 70.88 43.33 3.74 11.92 0.44
 SEM (n = 12) 0.329 0.046 0.030 1.031 0.628 0.330 0.302 0.007
 Vit C (mg/kg)
  0 16.31 6.33 5.70 71.32 43.87 3.79 12.34 0.44
  200 16.51 6.34 5.75 68.94 43.30 3.82 12.26 0.44
 SEM (n = 12) 0.329 0.046 0.030 1.031 0.628 0.330 0.302 0.007
Effect (p-value) df
SD 1 0.18 0.96 0.82 0.32 0.56 0.79 0.09 0.85
Vit C 1 0.67 0.79 0.33 0.12 0.53 0.95 0.86 0.59
SD × Vit C 1 0.55 0.13 0.67 0.12 0.20 0.12 0.86 0.20

Yield, relative breast weight; WHC, water holding capacity; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (malondialdehyde equivalents per g of meat sample); CIE, Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage.

Download Excel Table
Table 5. Effects of stocking density (SD) and dietary supplementation of vitamin C (Vit C) on liver antioxidant status of broiler chickens
Treatment Antioxidant status
SD (birds/m2) Vit C (mg/kg) MDA (μm/mg protein) TAC (U/mg protein)
9 0 1.71 713
200 1.84 702
18 0 1.69 681
200 1.66 694
SEM (n = 6) 0.178 10.3
Main effect
 SD (birds/m2)
  9 1.78 707
  18 1.67 688
 SEM (n = 12) 0.126 7.3
 Vit C (mg/kg)
  0 1.70 697
  200 1.75 698
 SEM (n = 12) 0.126 7.3
Effect (p-value) df
SD 1 0.57 0.07
Vit C 1 0.77 0.92
SD × Vit C 1 0.66 0.27

MDA, malondialdehyde; TAC, total antioxidant capacity.

Download Excel Table
Intestinal permeability

No interaction between SD and dietary supplementation of 200 mg/kg vitamin C was observed for TER values in the jejunal mucosa as a measure of intestinal permeability (Table 6). However, birds raised at high SD had less (p < 0.05) TER values than those raised in low SD. However, TER values were not affected by dietary supplementation of vitamin C.

Table 6. Effects of stocking density (SD) and dietary supplementation of vitamin C (Vit C) on intestinal permeability in the jejunal mucosa of broiler chickens
Treatment Intestinal permeability
SD (birds/m2) Vit C (mg/kg) TER (Ω/cm2) PD (mV) ISC (μa/cm2)
9 0 336 300 0.90
200 297 173 5.69
18 0 218 125 1.73
200 244 258 2.24
SEM (n = 6) 36.3 99.4 2.758
Main effect
 SD (birds/m2)
  9 316 236 3.30
  18 231 192 1.99
 SEM (n = 12) 25.6 70.3 1.950
 Vit C (mg/kg)
  0 277 213 1.32
  200 271 215 3.97
 SEM (n = 12) 25.6 70.3 1.950
Effect (p-value) df
SD 1 0.03 0.66 0.64
Vit C 1 0.86 0.98 0.35
SD × Vit C 1 0.38 0.21 0.45

TER, trans-epithelial electrical resistance; PD, trans-epithelial voltage; ISC, short circuit current.

Download Excel Table

DISCUSSION

Many previous studies have reported that high SD decreased BWG, FI, and FE of broiler chickens compared with low SD, which is in agreement with the current observation [4,21,26]. The reason for these negative outcomes from high SD has been associated with various environmental and behavioral factors. First, high SD restrains the movement of birds in a floor space, which leads birds to have a difficulty in accessing feeders and drinkers [21]. Moreover, high SD may create an undesirable environment for birds owing to decreased air and floor quality, promoting health problems [6]. It is also suggested that birds raised at high SD may undergo moderate heat stress because of a reduction in heat dissipation by crowding [27]. These environmental and behavior problems caused by high SD are known to increase stress responses, which was confirmed by our observation for increasing stress responses with increasing blood H:L and feather CORT concentrations [28,29].

Vitamin C is a well-known antioxidant for animals but dietary supplementation of vitamin C is considered unnecessary for poultry because poultry can endogenously synthesize vitamin C in the kidney and liver [30,31]. However, under some conditions when poultry cannot synthesize enough vitamin C to satisfy its requirements such as stressful environment or aging, dietary supplementation of vitamin C may be required [12]. Likewise, several previous studies have reported that dietary supplementation of vitamin C exerted beneficial effects on productive performance of broiler chickens exposed to heat stress [1113]. However, there is limited information regarding the effects of dietary supplementation of vitamin C on broiler chickens raised at high SD. Therefore, we hypothesized that dietary supplementation of vitamin C may ameliorate the negative effect of high SD on broiler chickens. However, our results indicated that dietary supplementation of 200 mg/kg vitamin C had no beneficial effect on growth performance in broiler chickens, regardless of SD. The reason is not clear; however, it may be related to the fact that the extent of the high SD used in the present study may be insufficient to impart a significant stress on broiler chickens because previous studies suggested that the beneficial effect of dietary vitamin C may be insignificant when birds were raised under the normal or low stressful condition [12]. However, it should be noted that growth performance of birds raised at high SD was decreased in the current study, which makes it difficult to conclude that our experimental condition was not significantly stressful. One possible reason for little benefit of dietary supplementation of vitamin C may be that birds raised at high SD may have increased requirement of vitamin C, but this increase may be compensated by increased endogenous synthesis of vitamin C, which likely blunts the effect of feeding additional vitamin C to broiler chickens. To our knowledge, however, there are no previous studies regarding the interactive effect of dietary vitamin C and different SD on endogenous synthesis of vitamin C in broiler chickens. Thus, it is suggested that more studies are required to reveal the relationship between dietary supplementation of vitamin C and different levels of SD in broiler chickens.

High SD and dietary supplementation of vitamin C did not influence meat quality in the current study. It has been reported that high SD impairs broiler meat quality because high SD promotes oxidative stress, which is one of the main causes of decreased meat quality [32,33]. However, previous results have been equivocal. Our previous study [15] and several other studies [14,34] reported little association between high SD and broiler meat quality. The reason for these inconsistent results has been related to the variation in animals and the differing extent of high SD among studies. Likewise, the extent of the high SD used in the present study may also be too small to induce oxidative stress that affects meat quality in broiler chickens, which may be supported by our results that high SD had no effects on MDA and TAC concentrations in the liver. Accordingly, it appears that dietary supplementation of 200 mg/kg vitamin C as an antioxidant may exert a limited effect on meat quality of broiler chickens raised at our high SD conditions. Moreover, most values for meat quality in the current study were placed in the normal quantitative range for broiler breast quality, indicating that the current high SD conditions and dietary supplementation of vitamin C may not affect meat quality of broiler chickens.

The damage in intestinal barrier function has been associated with decreased productive performance and increased health problems in animals by increasing inflammatory responses and oxidative stress [35,36]. In the current study, TER values as a measure of intestinal barrier function were decreased by high SD, which agrees with our previous findings that increasing SD linearly decreased TER values by increasing intestinal permeability (i.e., decreasing intestinal barrier function) [15]. This decreased intestinal barrier function may be one of the reasons why broiler chickens raised at high SD had decreased performance in the current study. In previous studies, increased oxidative damage in intestinal cells was reported to decrease intestinal barrier function [37,38]. Therefore, it was hypothesized that dietary supplementation of vitamin C may ameliorate decreased intestinal barrier function of broiler chickens by a high SD. However, our hypothesis was not verified in the current study. The reason may be related to the fact that decreased intestinal barrier function by various stressors may not be caused only by increased oxidative stress in intestinal cells [35]. In addition, absorbed vitamin C may be rapidly transferred to blood circulation instead of being retained in the enterocyte [39], which may be the reason why vitamin C had little benefit on intestinal barrier function.

CONCLUSION

High SD of broiler chickens decreases productive performance and intestinal barrier function but increases stress responses without affecting meat quality and antioxidant status in the liver. However, no clear beneficial effects of supplemental vitamin C in diets at the level of 200 mg/kg are observed for broiler chickens raised at the high SD condition used in this study.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2019R1A2C4070556).

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Yu DG, Namgung N, Kil DY.

Data curation: Yu DG, Kim JH, Won SY.

Formal analysis: Namgung N, Won SY, Choi WJ.

Methodology: Yu DG, Kim JH, Won SY.

Software: Yu DG, Kim JH, Choi WJ.

Validation: Kim JH, Won SY, Kil DY.

Investigation: Yu DG, Namgung N, Choi WJ.

Writing - original draft: Yu DG, Namgung N.

Writing - review & editing: Kim JH, Kil DY.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol for the current experiment was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Chung-Ang University (IACUC No. 2019-00086).

REFERENCES

1.

Buijs S, Keeling L, Rettenbacher S, Van Poucke E, Tuyttens FAM. Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators. Poult Sci. 2009; 88:1536-43

2.

Puron D, Santamaria R, Segura JC, Alamilla JL. Broiler performance at different stocking densities. J Appl Poult Res. 1995; 4:55-60

3.

Estevez I. Density allowances for broilers: where to set the limits?. Poult Sci. 2007; 86:1265-72

4.

Zuowei S, Yan L, Yuan L, Jiao H, Song Z, Guo Y, et al. Stocking density affects the growth performance of broilers in a sex-dependent fashion. Poult Sci. 2011; 90:1406-15

5.

Selvam R, Saravanakumar M, Suresh S, Sureshbabu G, Sasikumar M, Prashanth D. Effect of vitamin E supplementation and high stocking density on the performance and stress parameters of broilers. Rev Bras Cienc Avic. 2017; 19:587-94

6.

Goo D, Kim JH, Choi HS, Park GH, Han GP, Kil DY. Effect of stocking density and sex on growth performance, meat quality, and intestinal barrier function in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2019; 98:1153-60

7.

Ahmadu S, Mohammed AA, Buhari H, Auwal A. An overview of vitamin C as an antistress in poultry. Malays J Vet Res. 2016; 7:9-22

8.

Wei J, Lei G, Fu L, Zeng C, Yang T, Peng S. Association between dietary vitamin C intake and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study among middle-aged and older adults. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11e0147985

9.

Mahmoud KZ, Edens FW, Eisen EJ, Havenstein GB. Effect of ascorbic acid and acute heat exposure on heat shock protein 70 expression by young white Leghorn chickens. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003; 136:329-35

10.

Whitehead CC, Keller T. An update on ascorbic acid in poultry. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2003; 59:161-84

11.

Stilborn HL, Harris GC, Bottje WG, Waldroup PW. Ascorbic acid and acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) in the diet of broilers maintained under heat stress conditions. Poult Sci. 1988; 67:1183-7

12.

Kutlu HR, Forbes JM. Changes in growth and blood parameters in heat-stressed broiler chicks in response to dietary ascorbic acid. Livest Prod Sci. 1993; 36:335-50

13.

Rafiee F, Mazhari M, Ghoreishi M, Esmaeilipour O. Effect of lemon verbena powder and vitamin C on performance and immunity of heat-stressed broilers. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2016; 100:807-12

14.

Wang B, Min Z, Yuan J, Zhang B, Guo Y. Effects of dietary tryptophan and stocking density on the performance, meat quality, and metabolic status of broilers. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2014; 5:44

15.

Goo D, Kim JH, Park GH, Delos Reyes JB, Kil DY. Effect of heat stress and stocking density on growth performance, breast meat quality, and intestinal barrier function in broiler chickens. Animals. 2019; 9:107

16.

Aviagen. Ross 308 AP Broiler: nutrition specifications. Newbridge, UK: Ross Breeders. 2017

17.

NRC [National Research Council]. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1994

18.

Lohakare JD, Ryu MH, Hahn TW, Lee JK, Chae BJ. Effects of supplemental ascorbic acid on the performance and immunity of commercial broilers. J Appl Poult Res. 2005; 14:10-9

19.

Kim JH, Jung H, Pitargue FM, Han GP, Choi HS, Kil DY. Effect of dietary calcium concentrations in low non-phytate phosphorus diets containing phytase on growth performance, bone mineralization, litter quality, and footpad dermatitis incidence in growing broiler chickens. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017; 30:979-83

20.

Lentfer TL, Pendl H, Gebhardt-Henrich SG, Fröhlich EKF, Von Borell E. H/L ratio as a measurement of stress in laying hens-methodology and reliability. Br Poult Sci. 2015; 56:157-63

21.

Cengiz Ö, Köksa BH, Tatlı O, Sevim Ö, Ahsan U, Üner AG, et al. Effect of dietary probiotic and high stocking density on the performance, carcass yield, gut microflora, and stress indicators of broilers. Poult Sci. 2015; 94:2395-403

22.

Bortolotti GR, Marchant TA, Blas J, German T. Corticosterone in feathers is a long-term, integrated measure of avian stress physiology. Funct Ecol. 2008; 22:494-500

23.

Ataallahi M, Nejad JG, Song JI, Kim JS, Park KH. Effects of feather processing methods on quantity of extracted corticosterone in broiler chickens. J Anim Sci Technol. 2020; 62:884-92

24.

Shen YB, Voilqué G, Odle J, Kim SW. Dietary L-tryptophan supplementation with reduced large neutral amino acids enhances feed efficiency and decreases stress hormone secretion of nursery pigs under social-mixing stress. J Nutr. 2012; 142:1540-6

25.

Ding XM, Mu YD, Zhang KY, Wang JP, Bai SP, Zeng QF, et al. Vitamin E improves antioxidant status but not lipid metabolism in laying hens fed a aged corn-containing diet. Anim Biosci. 2021; 34:276-84

26.

Shakeri M, Zulkifli I, Soleimani AF, O’Reilly EL, Eckersall PD, Anna AA, et al. Response to dietary supplementation of L-glutamine and L-glutamate in broiler chickens reared at different stocking densities under hot, humid tropical conditions. Poult Sci. 2014; 93:2700-8

27.

Feddes JJ, Emmanuel EJ, Zuidhof MJ. Broiler performance, bodyweight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poult Sci. 2002; 81:774-9

28.

Najafi P, Zulkifli I, Jajuli NA, Farjam AS, Ramiah SK, Amir AA, et al. Environmental temperature and stocking density effects on acute phase proteins, heat shock protein 70, circulating corticosterone and performance in broiler chickens. Int J Biometeorol. 2015; 59:1577-83

29.

Qaid M, Albatshan H, Shafey T, Hussein E, Abudabos AM. Effect of stocking density on the performance and immunity of 1- to 14-d-old broiler chicks. Rev Bras Cienc Avic. 2016; 18:683-92

30.

Khan RU, Naz S, Nikousefat Z, Selvaggi M, Laudadio V, Tufarelli V. Effect of ascorbic acid in heat-stressed poultry. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2012; 68:477-90

31.

Gan L, Fan H, Nie W, Guo Y. Ascorbic acid synthesis and transportation capacity in old laying hens and the effects of dietary supplementation with ascorbic acid. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018; 9:71

32.

Li W, Wei F, Xu B, Sun Q, Deng W, Ma H, et al. Effect of stocking density and alpha-lipoic acid on the growth performance, physiological and oxidative stress and immune response of broilers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019; 32:1914-22

33.

Xing T, Gao F, Tume RK, Zhou G, Xu X. Stress effects on meat quality: a mechanistic perspective. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2018; 18:380-401

34.

Simitzis PE, Kalogeraki E, Goliomytis M, Charismiadou MA, Triantaphyllopoulos K, Ayoutanti A, et al. Impact of stocking density on broiler growth performance, meat characteristics, behavioural components and indicators of physiological and oxidative stress. Br Poult Sci. 2012; 53:721-30

35.

Lambert GP. Stress-induced gastrointestinal barrier dysfunction and its inflammatory effects. J Anim Sci. 2009; 87:E101-8

36.

Hu CH, Qian ZC, Song J, Luan ZS, Zuo AY. Effects of zinc oxide-montmorillonite hybrid on growth performance, intestinal structure, and function of broiler chicken. Poult Sci. 2013; 92:143-50

37.

Farhadi A, Banan A, Fields J, Keshavarzian A. Intestinal barrier: an interface between health and disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003; 18:479-97

38.

Placha I, Takacova J, Ryzner M, Cobanova K, Laukova A, Strompfova V, et al. Effect of thyme essential oil and selenium on intestine integrity and antioxidant status of broilers. Br Poult Sci. 2014; 55:105-14

39.

Wilson JX. Regulation of vitamin C transport. Annu Rev Nutr. 2005; 25:105-25