Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of dietary inactivated probiotics on growth performance and immune responses of weaned pigs

Joowon Kang1,#https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7340-1479, Jeong Jae Lee1,#https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3455-0102, Jin Ho Cho2,#https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-0778, Jeehwan Choe3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7217-972X, Hyunjin Kyoung1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5742-5374, Sung Hun Kim4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5977-6167, Hyeun Bum Kim5,*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1366-6090, Minho Song1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4515-5212
1Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
2Division of Food and Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
3Department of Beef Science, Korea National Collage of Agriculture and Fisheries, Jeonju 54874, Korea
4CJ CheilJedang Corporation, Seoul 04560, Korea
5Department of Animal Resource, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
*Corresponding author: Hyeun Bum Kim, Department of Animal Resource, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea. Tel: +82-41-550-3653, E-mail: hbkim@dankook.ac.kr
*Corresponding author: Minho Song, Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea. Tel: +82-42-821-5776, E-mail: mhsong@cnu.ac.kr

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

© Copyright 2021 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jan 08, 2021; Revised: Feb 04, 2021; Accepted: Feb 05, 2021

Published Online: May 31, 2021

Abstract

This experiment was performed to verify whether dietary heat-killed Lactobacillus rhamnosus (LR) improves growth performance and modulates immune responses of weaned pigs. Ninety-six weaned pigs ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc; 6.95 ± 0.25 kg body weight [BW]; 28 d old) were randomly allocated to four treatments: 1) a basal diet without heat-killed LR (CON), 2) T1 (CON with 0.1% heat-killed LR), 3) T2 (CON with 0.2% heat-killed LR), and 4) T3 (CON with 0.4% heat-killed LR). Each treatment had six pens with four pigs (6 replicates per treatment) in a randomized completely block design. The heat-killed LR used in this study contained 1 × 109 FU/g of LR in a commercial product. Pigs were fed each treatment for four weeks using a two-phase feeding program to measure growth performance and frequency of diarrhea. During the last week of this study, all diets contained 0.2% chromic oxide as an indigestible marker. Fecal sampling was performed through rectal palpation for the consecutive three days after the four adaptation days to measure apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter, crude protein, and gross energy (GE). Blood sampling was also performed on day 1, 3, 7, and 14 after weaning to measure immune responses such as serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), C-reactive protein (CRP), and cortisol. The heat-killed LR increased (p < 0.05) growth rate, feed efficiency, and ATTD of GE for overall experimental period compared with CON, but reduced (p < 0.05) post-weaning diarrhea. In addition, pigs fed diets contained heat-killed had lower concentrations of serum TNF-α (d 7; p < 0.05), TGF-β1 (d 7; p < 0.10), and cortisol (d 3 and 7; p < 0.05) than pigs fed CON. In conclusion, dietary heat-killed LR improved growth rate, modified immune responses of weaned pigs, and alleviated post-weaning diarrhea.

Keywords: Diarrhea; Growth performance; Heat-killed Lactobacillus rhamnosus; Immune responses; Inactivated probiotics; Weaned pigs

INTRODUCTION

The concept of probiotics is widely known as “live micro-organisms that confer a health benefit on the host when administered in adequate amounts” [1]. Probiotics are known to increase growth rate and nutrient utilization and to change immunity when it is used in pig diets [26]. However, when probiotics are added to animal feeds, there can be side effects, such as toxicity in the host caused by production of enterotoxins from micro-organisms included in the probiotics [5,7] and a risk of infection due to strong adhesion to the intestinal tract by probiotic micro-organism [8]. In addition, there is a concern to maintain the activity of probiotics and thus stability of probiotics is required in term of viability and metabolic and functional activities during shelf life [9].

Current research suggests that inactivated probiotics can have the same beneficial effects as probiotics [1012]. Inactivated probiotics not only benefit the host by regulating immunity, suppressing pathogens through the increased intestine adhesion, and providing metabolites secreted from dead cells but also offer easier storage, longer product shelf life, and more convenient transportation [13,14]. Inactivated probiotics can also complement the risk and stability of probiotics [15]. Inactivated probiotics can be obtained by heat treatment methods and thus it is generally called heat-killed probiotics. Heat-killed probiotics can release components such as lipoteichoic acids, peptidoglycan, or exopolysaccharides (EPS) with immuno-regulating effects against pathogens [16].

Lactobacillus rhamnosus (LR) has been shown to increase growth rate of pre-weaning pigs, mitigate diarrhea incidence, and regulate immunity [17,18]. However, previous study reported LR isolated from humans reduced growth performance, increased diarrhea scores, and reduced immunoglobulins of the Escherichiacoli challenged pigs [19]. On the other hand, previous studies showed heat-killed LR improved growth rate, feed application, and immunity and reduced stress of fish [20,21]. In addition, heat-killed LR can act as an immune regulator by reducing lipopolysaccharide-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines in the human placenta and increasing anti-inflammatory cytokines in infant rats [22,23]. However, there are limited information about dietary heat-killed LR in animal diets.

Therefore, the objective of present study was to evaluate dietary effects of heat-killed LR on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and immune responses of weaned pigs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea (approval code: CNU-00832).

Inactivated probiotics

The LR stains in the study were isolated from pigs and cultured in MRS (DeMan-Rogosa-Sharpe) broth (BD DifcoTM, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for 18 hours at 37°C in an anaerobic incubator before use. Heat-killed LR was processed by heating at 80°C for 30 min. The stain is a white flowable powder which contains 1 × 109 FU/g of EPS-cell particle (CJ CheilJedang Biotechnology Research Institute, Seoul, Korea).

Experimental design, animal, and diets

Ninety-six weaned pigs ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc; 6.95 ± 0.25 kg body weight [BW]; 28 d old) were randomly allotted to four treatments: 1) a basal diet without heat-killed LR (CON), 2) T1 (CON with 0.1% heat-killed LR), 3) T2 (CON with 0.2% heat-killed LR), and 4) T3 (CON with 0.4% heat-killed LR). Each treatment had six pens with four pigs (2 barrows and 2 gilts; 6 replicates per treatment) in a randomized completely block design (blocks: BW and sex). The different inclusion levels of heat-killed LR were deiced based on the results from previous pilot studies and producer’s recommendations. All diets were formulated to meet and exceed the nutrient requirements for weaned pigs [24] and were provided in a two-phase feeding program with each phase lasting two weeks (Table 1). All pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water.

Table 1. Composition of basal diet for weaned pigs (as-fed basis)1)
Item Phase Ⅰ Phase Ⅱ
Ingredient (%)
 Corn 48.48 66.37
 Soybean meal (44%) 19.10 19.50
 Whey powder 15.00 5.00
 Fish meal 6.00 3.00
 Spray-dried plasma protein 4.00 3.00
 Lactose 4.00 -
 Soybean oil 1.00 -
 Dicalcium phosphate 0.60 0.80
 Limestone 0.70 0.80
 Salt 0.20 0.20
 Vit-min premix2) 0.50 0.50
 L-Lysine-HCl 0.25 0.44
 DL-Methionine 0.12 0.15
 L-Threonine 0.05 0.14
 L-Tryptophan - 0.10
 Total 100 100
Calculated energy and nutrient contents (%)
 Metabolizable energy (Mcal/kg) 3.39 3.34
 Crude protein (%) 21.66 19.63
 Calcium (%) 0.80 0.71
 Phosphorus (%) 0.70 0.62
 Lysine (%) 1.53 1.43

Phase Ⅰ, 1 to 2 weeks (14 days); phase Ⅱ , 3 to 4 weeks (14 days).

Provide per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 12,000 IU; vitamin D3, 2,500 IU; vitamin E, 30 IU; vitamin K3, 3 mg; D-pantothenic acid, 15 mg; nicotinic acid, 40 mg; choline, 400 mg; and vitamin B12, 12 μg, Fe, 90 mg from iron sulfate; Cu, 8.8 mg from copper sulfate; Zn, 100 mg from zinc oxide; Mn, 54 mg from manganese oxide; I, 0.35 mg from potassium iodide; Se, 0.30 mg from sodium selenite.

Download Excel Table
Data analysis and sample collection

Growth performance (average daily gain [ADG], average daily feed intake [ADFI], and feed efficiency [gain to feed ratio, G:F]) was calculated by measuring the weight of individual pigs and pen feeders on day 1, 14, and 28. Daily visual diarrhea scores of individual pigs (1 = hard and dry normal feces, 2 = well formed, 3 = moist feces, 4 = diarrhea, 5 = watery diarrhea) were recorded for 2 weeks after weaning. The frequency of diarrhea was calculated by counting pens per day with an average diarrhea score over 4 in each pen [25,26]. On day 1, 3, 7, and 14 of the experimental period, one pig was randomly chosen from each pen for blood collection. Whole blood and serum were collected from the jugular vein of pigs using EDTA and non-EDTA tubes, respectively (10 mL; BD Vacutainer Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The blood was kept at room temperature to coagulate and centrifuged to separate the serum at 3,000×g at 4°C for 15 min and stored at −20°C. Dietary treatments contained 0.2% chromic oxide as an indigestible marker for the last week of the experimental period. Fecal samples were collected by rectal palpation from randomly chosen one pig in each pen for the last 3–4 days of experiment after the 4 adaptation days and immediately stored at −20°C.

Sample analyses

Feed and fecal samples were dried in a drying oven for 72 h at 65°C and ground with a cyclone mill (1.0 mm screen; Foss Tecator cyclotec 1093, Foss, Hillerød, Denmark). Samples were analyzed for dry matter (DM), and crude protein (CP; N × 6.25) following the method of the AOAC [27]. Gross energy (GE) was analyzed by automatic bomb calorimeter (PARR 1261 Bomb Calorimeter, PARR Instrument, Moline, IL, USA). Chromium content was determined by the absorption spectrophotometer (Hitachi Z-5000 Absorption Spectrophotometer, Hitachi High-Tech, Tokyo, Japan) based on the method of Williams et al. [28]. Nutrient digestibility (apparent total tract digestibility [ATTD]) was calculated according to the index method formula [29].

The number of white blood cell (WBC) was determined by an eight-parameter hematology analyzer (Scil vet abcTM Animal Blood Counter, Scil Animal Care Company, Altorf, France). Immune responses such as serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), C-reactive protein (CRP), and cortisol were measured using ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol (TNF-α, TGF-β1, and CRP [Genorise Scientific, Berwyn, PA, USA]; cortisol [Cusabio Biotech, Wuhan, China]).

Statistical analyses

Data were subjected using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) in a randomized completely block design (blocks: BW and sex). Experimental unit was the pen. Statistical model for growth performance, ATTD of nutrients, immune responses included dietary treatment as a fixed effect and blocks as random effects. Contrasts were performed to verify linear and quadratic effects of heat-killed LR. Frequency of diarrhea was analyzed by the chi-square test. Data were given as least square mean ± SEM. Values of p < 0.05 and 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10 were considered as statistical significance and tendency, respectively.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

During the first two weeks of this study, the heat-killed LR group increased growth rate (ADG; p < 0.05) and feed efficiency (G:F; p ≤ 0.10) of weaned pigs compared with CON (Table 2). In addition, there were linear improvements (p < 0.05) of growth rate and feed efficiency of weaned pigs as the addition levels of heat-killed LR were increased in the diet (Table 2). Growth rate (ADG; p < 0.05) and feed efficiency (G:F; p < 0.05) of weaned pigs were increased in the heat-killed LR group for overall experimental period compared with those in CON (Table 2). Moreover, growth rate and feed efficiency of weaned pigs during overall experimental period were linearly improved (p < 0.05) when the inclusion levels of heat-killed LR were increased in the diet (Table 2). The heat-killed LR group decreased (p < 0.05) post-weaning diarrhea of weaned pigs compared with CON (Fig. 1). Previous studies also showed live and heat-killed Lactobacillus strains increased weight gain in pigs [3032], mice [33], and fish [34] and mitigated diarrhea in human and animals [18,35,36]. When pigs are infected by enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) after weaning, it increases cell fluid and electrolytes into the lumen and decreases absorbing them into intestinal cells by ETEC, leading post-weaning diarrhea [37]. In addition, the ETEC infection increases the paracellular permeability and further the penetration of pathogens and toxins into the lumen, thereby increasing the inflammatory immune responses and reducing the growth of animals [37]. The results from present study may be due to the mechanism of live and inactivated probiotics that prevent adherence of pathogens to the intestinal barrier and regulate the immune system of animals [14,16,32,38].

Table 2. Dietary effects of heat-killed LR on growth performance of weaned pigs1)
Item Treatments2) SEM p-value
CON T1 T2 T3 Diet Linear Quadratic
Day 1 to 14
 Initial BW (kg) 6.95 6.95 6.95 6.95 0.26 1.000 0.991 0.991
 Final BW (kg) 11.52 12.53 12.63 12.95 0.45 0.160 0.052 0.308
 ADG (g/d) 326a 398b 406c 428d 25.00 0.045 0.014 0.192
 ADFI (g/d) 522 519 519 520 22.00 1.000 0.945 0.937
 G:F (g/g) 0.625a 0.768b 0.782b 0.824b 0.045 0.069 0.027 0.204
Day 15 to 28
 Initial BW (kg) 11.52 12.53 12.63 12.95 0.45 0.160 0.052 0.308
 Final BW (kg) 18.96a 20.13ab 20.97b 21.31b 0.62 0.064 0.015 0.254
 ADG (g/d) 531 543 596 597 26.00 0.188 0.057 0.482
 ADFI (g/d) 931 924 930 926 41.00 0.999 0.954 0.980
 G:F (g/g) 0.571 0.588 0.641 0.645 0.030 0.290 0.092 0.571
Overall
 Initial BW (kg) 6.95 6.95 6.95 6.95 0.26 1.000 0.991 0.991
 Final BW (kg) 18.96 20.13 20.97 21.31 0.62 0.064 0.015 0.254
 ADG (g/d) 428a 471b 501c 513d 16.00 0.005 0.001 0.110
 ADFI (g/d) 727 722 725 723 28.00 0.999 0.944 0.960
 G:F (g/g) 0.590a 0.652a 0.691ab 0.710b 0.030 0.022 0.005 0.193

Each value is the mean value of 6 replicates (4 pigs/pen).

CON, control diet based on corn and soybean meal; T1, CON + 0.1% heat-killed LR; T2, CON + 0.2% heat-killed LR; T3, CON + 0.4% heat-killed LR.

Means with different superscripts in the row differ (p ≤ 0.10).

BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; G:F, gain to feed ratio.

Download Excel Table
jast-63-3-520-g1
Fig. 1. Frequency of diarrhea of weaned pigs for the first 2 weeks after weaning. Frequency of diarrhea (%) = (number of diarrhea if the diarrhea score over 4 / number of pen days) × 100. Data was subjected by the chi-square test. Diarrhea scores were 1 = hard and dry normal feces, 2 = well formed, 3 = moist feces, 4 = diarrhea, 5 = watery diarrhea. a,bMeans with different letters within each treatment differ (p < 0.05). CON, control diet based on corn and soybean meal; T1, CON + 0.1% heat-killed LR; T2, CON + 0.2% heat-killed LR; T3, CON + 0.4% heat-killed LR.
Download Original Figure

The ATTD of GE of weaned pigs was higher (p < 0.05) in the heat-killed LR group than that in CON (Table 3). There was also a linear improvement (p < 0.05) of ATTD of GE of weaned pigs related to the increased inclusion concentrations of heat-killed LR in the diet (Table 3). However, no differences were found on ATTD of DM and CP of weaned pigs among dietary treatments (Table 3). These results are similar to the results from previous studies using live probiotics [39,40]. The EPS produced by Lactobacillus strains exists for a long time in the intestine and promotes colonization of Lactobacillus in the intestinal tract, thereby alleviating lactose intolerance, modulation of immunity against pathogens, and reducing mutagenic enzymes such as β-glucuronidase, nitroreductase and chologlycine hydrolase [41]. In addition, Lactobacillus strains increased nutrient utilization by enzymes such as β-galactosidase that are potentially activated and helps nutrient digestion [40].

Table 3. Dietary effects of heat-killed LR on nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs1)
Item Treatments2) SEM p-value
CON T1 T2 T3 Diet Linear Quadratic
DM (%) 85.45 86.45 86.00 86.29 0.43 0.407 0.336 0.442
CP (%) 82.48 83.26 84.00 83.84 0.73 0.466 0.202 0.361
GE (%) 85.25a 86.87ab 87.29ab 88.53b 0.66 0.018 0.003 0.447

Each value is the mean value of 6 replicates (4 pigs/pen).

CON, control diet based on corn and soybean meal; T1, CON + 0.1% heat-killed LR; T2, CON + 0.2% heat-killed LR; T3, CON + 0.4% heat-killed LR.

Means with different superscripts in the row differ (p ≤ 0.10).

DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; GE, gross energy.

Download Excel Table

Serum TNF-α of weaned pigs was decreased in the heat-killed LR group (d 7; p < 0.05) compared with that in CON (Table 4). In addition, there was a significant linear decrease (p < 0.05) in serum TNF-α of weaned pigs as the inclusion levels of heat-killed LR were increased in the diet (Table 4). The heat-killed LR decreased serum TGF-β1 (d 7; p ≤ 0.10) and cortisol (d 3 and 7; p < 0.05) of weaned pigs compared with CON (TTable 4). There was also a significant linear decrease (d 7; p ≤ 0.05) in serum cortisol of weaned pigs when the inclusion levels of heat-killed LR were increased in the diet (Table 4). However, there were no significant differences on the number of WBC and serum CRP among dietary treatments (Table 4). Previous studies reported the live and heat-killed Lactobacillus stains decreased TNF-α [22,42,43], TGF-β1 [44,45], and cortisol [46,47] in human and mice. Cortisol is a substance released in responses to acute stress. Generally, weaned pigs can face social, physical, and physiological stresses and contribute to increasing intestinal permeability and depressing immune responses [48]. It is known that live LR decreases cortisol by secreting neurotransmitters [48] and that the EPS produced by Lactobacillus strains shields adhesive surface polymers to prevent pathogens from sticking to intestinal barrier and regulates immune responses to inhibit the releases of pro-inflammatory cytokines. [43,49,50]. The CRP is the first acute-phase protein that can be used as an inflammatory response indicator and pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and TGF-β1 are important inducers of CRP synthesis [51]. In present study, the CRP of weaned pigs was no significant difference among dietary treatments, but the concentration of CRP was decreased during the experimental period. Therefore, heat-killed LR may be thought to provide anti-inflammatory effects in the immune system [44,45].

Table 4. Dietary effects of heat-killed LR on immune responses of weaned pigs1)
Item Treatments2) SEM p-value
CON T1 T2 T3 Diet Linear Quadratic
The number of WBC (×103/µL)
 D1 17.93 18.12 17.79 18.13 1.31 0.997 0.944 0.932
 D3 17.96 17.02 17.88 17.98 0.86 0.829 0.772 0.677
 D7 16.99 15.59 16.20 16.13 0.61 0.454 0.553 0.321
 D14 17.38 16.13 16.49 15.80 1.05 0.739 0.370 0.751
TNF-α (pg/mL)
 D1 1,135 1,189 1,095 1,052 174 0.952 0.652 0.889
 D3 988 935 927 910 97 0.947 0.605 0.800
 D7 849a 600b 542b 523b 57 0.002 0.001 0.018
 D14 548 495 480 485 60 0.843 0.507 0.559
TGF-β1 (pg/mL)
 D1 1,404 1,397 1,473 1,469 119 0.949 0.639 0.892
 D3 1,552 1,418 1,404 1,397 195 0.934 0.626 0.700
 D7 775a 602ab 601ab 578b 59 0.096 0.053 0.146
 D14 557 536 536 525 72 0.990 0.771 0.918
CRP (pg/mL)
 D1 8,436 8,363 8,468 8,248 288 0.950 0.677 0.803
 D3 7,039 6,929 6,918 6,985 404 0.996 0.954 0.824
 D7 6,081 5,918 5,895 5,602 521 0.930 0.523 0.969
 D14 5,616 5,423 5,430 5,098 391 0.822 0.367 0.946
Cortisol (ng/mL)
 D1 8.94 9.03 8.98 8.75 0.43 0.970 0.708 0.762
 D3 7.71a 5.43b 5.67b 5.70b 0.57 0.037 0.065 0.042
 D7 7.25a 5.58b 5.56b 5.44b 0.43 0.023 0.020 0.052
 D14 5.62 4.76 4.76 4.60 0.51 0.500 0.232 0.424

Each value is the mean value of 6 replicates (4 pigs/pen).

CON, control diet based on corn and soybean meal; T1, CON + 0.1% heat-killed LR; T2, CON + 0.2% heat-killed LR; T3, CON + 0.4% heat-killed LR.

Means with different superscripts in the row differ (p ≤ 0.10).

WBC, white blood cell; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-β1; CRP, C-reactive protein.

Download Excel Table

CONCLUSION

Dietary heat-killed LR improved growth rate, modified immune responses of weaned pigs, and alleviated post-weaning diarrhea. Supplementation of dietary heat-killed LR in weaner diets may reduce post-weaning diarrhea by protecting the intestinal barrier from pathogens and attenuating pro-inflammatory immune responses and post-weaning stress.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) through Useful Agricultural Life Resources Industry Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (120051-02-2-HD020), and supported by CJ CheilJedang Biotechnology Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Kang J, Kim SH, Song M.

Data curation: Kang J, Lee JJ, Cho JH.

Formal analysis: Choe J, Kyoung H, Kim SH.

Methodology: Kang J, Lee JJ, Cho JH, Kyoung H.

Software: Kang J, Lee JJ, Kim SH.

Validation: Cho JH, Choe J, Kim HB.

Investigation: Kang J, Cho JH, Kim HB.

Writing - original draft: Kang J, Lee JJ, Song M.

Writing - review & editing: Lee JJ, Cho JH, Song M.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This experimental protocol for this research was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea (approval code #CNU-00832).

REFERENCES

1.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. Probiotics in animal nutrition – production, impact and regulation. Rome: FAO. 2016FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 179

2.

Kelly D. Probiotics in young and newborn animals. J Anim Feed Sci. 1998; 7:15-23

3.

Cho JH, Zhao PY, Kim IH. Probiotics as a dietary additive for pigs: a review. J Anim Vet Adv. 2011; 10:2127-34

4.

Stein H. Feeding the pigs’ immune system and alternatives to antibiotics.In Proceedings of the 7th London Swine Conference Proceedings. 2007; London, ON: Canada. p p. 65-82

5.

Zhu GQ, Musa HH, Wu SL, Zhu CH, Seri HI. The potential benefits of probiotics in animal production and health. J Anim Vet Adv. 2009; 8:313-21

6.

Patil AK, Kumar S, Verma AK, Baghel RPS. Probiotics as feed additives in weaned pigs: a review. Livest Res Int. 2015; 3:31-9

7.

Isa K, Oka K, Beauchamp N, Sato M, Wada K, Ohtani K, et al. Safety assessment of the Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588® probiotic strain including evaluation of antimicrobial sensitivity and presence of Clostridium toxin genes in vitro and teratogenicity in vivo. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2016; 35:818-32

8.

Boyle RJ, Robins-browne RM, Tang MLK. Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks?. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 83:1256-64

9.

Gueimonde M, Sánchez B. Enhancing probiotic stability in industrial processes. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2012; 23:2-6

10.

Mottet C, Michetti P. Probiotics: wanted dead or alive. Dig Liver Dis. 2005; 37:3-6

11.

Adams CA. The probiotic paradox: live and dead cells are biological response modifiers. Nutr Res Rev. 2010; 23:37-46

12.

Lahtinen SJ. Probiotic viability – does it matter?. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2012; 23:10-4

13.

Ou CC, Lin SL, Tsai JJ, Lin MY. Heat-killed lactic acid bacteria enhance immunomodulatory potential by skewing the immune response toward Th1 polarization. J Food Sci. 2011; 76:M260-7

14.

de Almada CN, Almada CN, Martinez RCR, Sant’Ana AS. Paraprobiotics: evidences on their ability to modify biological responses, inactivation methods and perspectives on their application in foods. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2016; 58:96-114

15.

Taverniti V, Guglielmetti S. The immunomodulatory properties of probiotic microorganisms beyond their viability (ghost probiotics: proposal of paraprobiotic concept). Genes Nutr. 2011; 6:261-74

16.

Piqué N, Berlanga M, Miñana-Galbis D. Health benefits of heat-killed (Tyndallized) probiotics: an overview. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20:2534

17.

Wang Y, Gong L, Wu YP, Cui ZW, Wang YQ, Huang Y, et al. Oral administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG to newborn piglets augments gut barrier function in pre-weaning piglets. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2019; 20:180-92

18.

Li XQ, Zhu YH, Zhang HF, Yue Y, Cai ZX, Lu QP, et al. Risks associated with high-dose Lactobacillus rhamnosus in an Escherichia coli model of piglet diarrhoea: intestinal microbiota and immune imbalances. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7e40666

19.

Trevisi P, Casini L, Coloretti F, Mazzoni M, Merialdi G, Bosi P. Dietary addition of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG impairs the health of Escherichia coli F4-challenged piglets. Animal. 2011; 5:1354-60

20.

Dawood MAO, Koshio S, Ishikawa M, El-Sabagh M, Esteban MA, Zaineldin AI. Probiotics as an environment-friendly approach to enhance red sea bream, Pagrus major growth, immune response and oxidative status. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016; 57:170-8

21.

Dawood MAO, Koshio S, Ishikawa M, El-Sabagh M, Yokoyama S, Wang WL, et al. Physiological response, blood chemistry profile and mucus secretion of red sea bream (Pagrus major) fed diets supplemented with Lactobacillus rhamnosus under low salinity stress. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2017; 43:179-92

22.

Li N, Russell WM, Douglas-Escobar M, Hauser N, Lopez M, Neu J. Live and heat-killed Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: effects on proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines in gastrostomy-fed infant rats. Pediatr Res. 2009; 66:203-7

23.

Bloise E, Torricelli M, Novembri R, Borges LE, Carrarelli P, Reis FM, et al. Heat-killed Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG modulates urocortin and cytokine release in primary trophoblast cells. Placenta. 2010; 31:867-72

24.

NRC [National Research Council]. Nutrient requirement of swine. 11th ed Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 2012

25.

Lee JJ, Choi SH, Cho JH, Choe J, Kang J, Kim S, et al. Effects of dietary carbohydrases on productive performance and immune responses of lactating sows and their piglets. J Anim Sci Technol. 2019; 61:359-65

26.

Park S, Lee JJ, Yang BM, Cho JH, Kim S, Kang J, et al. Dietary protease improves growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal morphology of weaned pigs. J Anim Sci Technol. 2020; 62:21-30

27.

AOAC [Association of Official Analytical Chemists]. International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International. 2005

28.

Williams CH, David DJ, Iismaa O. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J Agric Sci. 1962; 59:381-5

29.

Lewis AJ. Digestion and balance techniques in pigs.In In: Lewis AJ, Southern LL, editors.editors Swine nutrition. 2nd ed Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press. 2001; p p. 903-16

30.

Busanello M, dos Santos Pozza MS, Pozza PC, Nunes RV, Chambo APS, Eckstein II. Probiotics: viable and inactivated cells on the performance, microflora and blood parameters of piglets. Rev Bras Saúde e Prod Anim. 2015; 16:387-96

31.

Bocourt R, Savon L, Díaz J, Brizuela MA, Serrano P, Prats A, et al. Effect of the probiotic activity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus on productive and health indicators of piglets. Cuba J Agric Sci. 2004; 38:75-9

32.

di Gioia D, Biavati B. Probiotics and prebiotics in animal health and food safety: conclusive remarks and future perspectives.In In: di Gioia D, Biavati B, editors.editors Probiotics and prebiotics in animal health and food safety. Cham, Switzerland, Swiss: Springer Nature. 2018; p p. 269-73

33.

Bernardeau M, Vernoux JP, Gueguen M. Safety and efficacy of probiotic lactobacilli in promoting growth in post-weaning Swiss mice. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002; 77:19-27

34.

Sewaka M, Trullas C, Chotiko A, Rodkhum C, Chansue N, Boonanuntanasarn S, et al. Efficacy of synbiotic Jerusalem artichoke and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG-supplemented diets on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, intestinal morphology, immune parameters and protection against Aeromonas veronii in juvenile red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019; 86:260-8

35.

Basu S, Chatterjee M, Ganguly S, Chandra PK. Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in persistent diarrhea in Indian children: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007; 41:756-60

36.

Zhang L, Xu YQ, Liu HY, Lai T, Ma JL, Wang JF, et al. Evaluation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG using an Escherichia coli K88 model of piglet diarrhoea: effects on diarrhoea incidence, faecal microflora and immune responses. Vet Microbiol. 2010; 141:142-8

37.

Kim JC, Hansen CF, Mullan BP, Pluske JR. Nutrition and pathology of weaner pigs: nutritional strategies to support barrier function in the gastrointestinal tract. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2012; 173:3-16

38.

Tareb R, Bernardeau M, Gueguen M, Vernoux J. In vitro characterization of aggregation and adhesion properties of viable and heat-killed forms of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains and interaction with foodborne zoonotic bacteria, especially Campylobacter jejuni. J Med Microbiol. 2013; 62:637-49

39.

Lan R, Koo J, Kim I. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microbial and noxious gas emission in weaning pigs. J Sci Food Agric. 2017; 97:1310-5

40.

Zhao PY, Kim IH. Effect of direct-fed microbial on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal noxious gas emission, fecal microbial flora and diarrhea score in weanling pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2015; 200:86-92

41.

Patel S, Majumder A, Goyal A. Potentials of exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria. Indian J Microbiol. 2012; 52:3-12

42.

Wang Y, Liu Y, Kirpich I, Ma Z, Wang C, Zhang M, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reduces hepatic TNFα production and inflammation in chronic alcohol-induced liver injury. J Nutr Biochem. 2013; 24:1609-15

43.

Oh NS, Joung JY, Lee JY, Kim Y. Probiotic and anti-inflammatory potential of Lactobacillus rhamnosus 4B15 and Lactobacillus gasseri 4M13 isolated from infant feces. PLOS ONE. 201813e0192021 February;

44.

Ting WJ, Kuo WW, Hsieh DJY, Yeh YL, Day CH, Chen YH, et al. Heat killed Lactobacillus reuteri GMNL-263 reduces fibrosis effects on the liver and heart in high fat diet-hamsters via TGF-β suppression. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16:25881-96

45.

Uchinaka A, Azuma N, Mizumoto H, Nakano S, Minamiya M, Yoneda M, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum L-137 on cardiac and adipose tissue in rats with metabolic syndrome. Sci Rep. 2018; 8:1-20

46.

Nishida K, Sawada D, Kuwano Y, Tanaka H, Sugawara T, Aoki Y, et al. Daily administration of paraprobiotic Lactobacillus gasseri CP2305 ameliorates chronic stress-associated symptoms in Japanese medical students. J Funct Foods. 2017; 36:112-21

47.

Yong SJ, Tong T, Chew J, Lim WL. Antidepressive mechanisms of probiotics and their therapeutic potential. Front Neurosci. 2020; 13:1361

48.

Moeser AJ, Pohl CS, Rajput M. Weaning stress and gastrointestinal barrier development: implications for lifelong gut health in pigs. Anim Nutr. 2017; 3:313-21

49.

Castro-Bravo N, Wells JM, Margolles A, Ruas-Madiedo P. Interactions of surface exopolysaccharides from Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus within the intestinal environment. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:2426

50.

Xiao K, Cao ST, Jiao LF, Lin FH, Wang L, Hu CH. Anemonin improves intestinal barrier restoration and influences TGF-β1 and EGFR signaling pathways in LPS-challenged piglets. Innate Immun. 2016; 22:344-52

51.

Lee JJ, Kang J, Park S, Cho JH, Oh S, Park DJ, et al. Effects of dietary protease on immune responses of weaned pigs. J Anim Sci Technol. 2020; 62:174-9