RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of energy levels on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and fatty acid composition of Holstein steers at different slaughter ages

Sung Il Kim1,#,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7572-1422, Sungkwon Park2,#https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7684-9719, Hyun Soo Lee3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1482-3203, Ji Hong Lee1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8906-3507, Do Hyung Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0726-8531, Jeong Hwan Myung3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-0374, Keun Ki Jung4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8995-8458
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Animal Science, Gyeongbuk Provincial College, Yecheon 36830, Korea
2Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
3Daehan Livestock & Feed Co., Ltd, Incheon 22300, Korea
4Moksan Hanwoo Research Institute, Gyeongsan 38507, Korea

# These authors contributed equally to this work.

*Corresponding author: Sung Il Kim, Department of Animal Science, Gyeongbuk Provincial College, Yecheon 36830, Korea. Tel: +82-54-650-0341, E-mail: ksi-30@hanmail.net

© Copyright 2023 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 09, 2023; Revised: Apr 10, 2023; Accepted: May 16, 2023

Published Online: Nov 30, 2023

Abstract

We investigated the effect of energy levels on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and fatty acid composition of Holstein steers at different slaughter ages. Forty Holstein steers with an average body weight (BW) of 234.21 ± 7.42 kg and 7.78 ± 0.22 months were randomly allocated to two experimental groups; a 22-month-old experimental group and a 24-month-old experimental group. Total digestible nutrients (TDN) for each group were set to 70% (T1) and 72% (T2) during fattening phase and 74% (T3) and 76% (T4) for the finishing phase, respectively. No difference was observed in the final BW between the experimental groups during the fattening phase. However, in the finishing phase, the final BW of T4 (820.31 kg) group was significantly higher than that of T1 (745.57 kg; p < 0.05). The average daily gain (ADG) of T2 group in the finishing phase and overall period were 1.27 kg and 1.26 kg, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of T1 (1.11 kg and 1.12 kg; p < 0.05). The feed conversion ratio (FCR) and TDN conversion ratio of T2 group in the finishing phase also decreased by 10.23% and 7.73%, respectively, compared to those of T1. The cold carcass weight of T4 group was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of T1, whereas back fat thickness, longissimus area, and marbling score were not significantly different among groups. No differences were observed in physicochemical characteristics of the carcass including moisture, crude protein, and crude fat content among groups. However, the composition of fatty acids differed significantly between the groups. The content of C18:0 was significantly lower (p < 0.05) in T4 than in T1 group, and the content of C18:2 was higher in T4 than in T1 and T3 (p < 0.05). Therefore, feeding Holstein steers at a high-energy feeding level during the fattening and finishing phases improves ADG and reduces the slaughter age from 24 months to 22 months.

Keywords: Holstein steer; Average daily gain; Feed conversion ratio; Fatty acid composition

INTRODUCTION

Holstein steers are s suitable breed for the beef cattle industry due to their relatively short fattening period and improved feed efficiency. They have a very high average daily gain (ADG) of 1.30–1.50 kg during the fattening period [1]. In addition, their uniform bloodline allows for better prediction and management of feed intake and ADG [2]. In recent years, many large-scale farmers have specialized in fattening Holstein cattle due to the low capital required for this breed. However, factors such as sex, castration, and nutrient feeding level considerably affect the growth performance and meat quality of beef cattle [3,4].

Previous studies have shown that increasing the energy feeding level by 10%–15% during the fattening period improves the growth performance of Holstein cattle [5]. Another study found that high-energy feed for 12 months increased intramuscular fat twice as much as in the 6-month experimental group [6]. However, little research has been conducted on improving the growth performance and meat quality of Holstein compared to other beef cattle, and previous studies have only focused on extending the fattening periods after castration [7]. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the most efficient energy feeding level for different slaughter ages of Holstein steers by adjusting the energy feeding level for different phases during the fattening period. This will help farmers reduce production costs and improve feed conversion ratio (FCR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental animals and design

Experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Committee of Yeungnam University, Korea (approval #: YUH-12-0340-016). Forty Holstein steers with an average age of 7.78 ± 0.22 months (average weight of 234.21 ± 7.42 kg) were classified into 22-month and 24-month groups depending on their age on slaughter. The energy feeding level for each group by slaughter age was set to 70% and 72% of total digestible nutrien (TDN) for the fattening phase and 74% and 76% for the finishing phase, respectively. Considering their weight and age, the test animals were randomly allocated to four groups (10 steers in each) depending on their slaughter age and energy feeding level (Table 1). The specification measurements were taken after 449 days (shipping date for the 22-month group) and 502 days (shipping date for the 24-month group).

Table 1. Experimental design of Holstein steers
Treatment No. of steers 22 month 24 month
Concentrate Concentrate
Fattening Finishing Fattening Finishing
Total digestible nutrients (%)1)
T1 10 70 74 - -
T2 10 72 76 - -
T3 10 - - 70 74
T4 10 - - 72 76

1) Each group were set to 70% (T1) and 72% (T2) during fattening phase and 74% (T3) and 76% (T4) for the finishing phase, respectively.

Download Excel Table
Experimental diets

Concentrates of the test feeds were produced by order at a feed factory in Incheon (Korea). These were divided into two stages for the fattening (7.7 to 10-month) and finishing (11 to 24 months) phases; rice straw was used as forage. Chemical composition for the experimental diets and formula of the feed ingredients are shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Concentrate and roughage feeding amounts were designed considering the nutritional level of Holstein steer by growth stage. (Table 4).

Table 2. Chemical composition of concentrate and roughage diets for experimental groups
Composition Concentrate Roughage SEM
Fattening Finishing Rice straw
T11) T2 T3 T4
Moisture 12.45 12.13 12.22 12.88 9.42 0.13
Crude protein 15.21 15.34 11.88 11.62 3.55 0.16
Crude fat 2.52 2.48 3.87 3.52 0.91 0.04
Crude fiber 9.75 9.81 10.59 10.14 32.01 0.07
Crude ash 4.36 4.12 3.51 3.30 9.12 0.08
NFE 55.71 56.12 57.93 58.54 55.01 0.30
Ca 0.45 0.43 0.32 0.37 0.18 0.07
P 0.30 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.16 0.01
TDN2) 70.00 72.00 74.00 76.00 37.57

1) Each group were set to 70% (T1) and 72% (T2) during fattening phase and 74% (T3) and 76% (T4) for the finishing phase, respectively.

2) Calculated.

NFE, nitrogen-free extract; TDN, total digestible nutrient.

Download Excel Table
Table 3. Formula of concentrate diet for experimental groups
Item Concentrate
Fattening Finishing
T11) T2 T3 T4
Ingredient, as-fed (%) 100 100 100 100
 Corn grain 31.50 33.50 30.00 31.50
 Wheat 1.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
 Wheat bran 17.50 15.50 18.00 16.50
 Corn gluten feed 12.00 9.00 13.00 11.00
 Soybean meal 7.50 7.50 4.50 4.50
 Palm kernel meal 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00
 Coconut meal 11.00 11.00 8.00 8.00
 Cotton seeds meal 3.50 3.50 4.50 4.50
 Molasses 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
 Salt dehydrated 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
 Limestone 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
 Vitamin premix2) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Mineral premix3) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1) Each group were set to 70% (T1) and 72% (T2) during fattening phase and 74% (T3) and 76% (T4) for the finishing phase, respectively.

2) Supplied per kg concentrate feed: 13,000 U vitamin A, 2500 U vitamin D3, 15 mg vitamin E, 1 mg vitamin B1, 0.56 mg vitamin B2, 0.5 mg vitamin B6, 0.01 mg vitamin B12, 12.5 mg vitamin niacin, 1.9 mg pantothenic acid, 0.15 mg folic acid.

3) Supplied per kg feed; 100 mg Zn, 50 mg Fe. 100 mg, 50 mg Mn, 6 mg Cu, 0.6 mg Co, 3 mg I, 0.3 mg Se.

Download Excel Table
Table 4. Feeding program for Holstein steers in the experiment
Fattening phase Age in month Body weight range(kg) Feeding level< (body wt, %) Concentrate fed (kg/hd/day, as-fed basis) Roughage fed (kg/hd/day, as-fed basis)
Fattening Finishing Rice straw
Fattening (as-fed, %) 7 230–300 2.13 6.4 2.0
8 300–345 2.13 7.2 2.0
9 345–390 2.18 8.5 2.0
10 390–435 2.18 9.5 2.0
Finishing (as-fed, %) 11 435–475 2.11 10.0 1.5
12 475–515 2.14 11.0 1.2
13 515–550 2.00 11.0 1.2
14 550–585 1.88 11.0 1.2
15 585–620 1.77 11.0 1.1
16 620–650 1.69 11.0 1.1
17 650–680 1.62 11.0 1.1
18 680–710 1.55 11.0 1.0
19 710–735 1.43 10.5 1.0
20 735–760 1.38 10.5 1.0
21 760–785 1.27 10.0 1.0
22 785–810 1.23 10.0 1.0
23 810–830 1.23 10.0 1.0
24 830–840 1.20 10.0 1.0
Download Excel Table
Feeding management

Steers were accommodated in eight pens of 5.0 m × 10.0 m in size, with five heads each, and were fed twice a day (morning and afternoon). Steers were fed fattening phase diets until they were 10 months old, and then switched to finishing phase diets until slaughter. Experimental animals were managed according to the traditional Korean farm regulation and given ad libitum access to water. Throughout the experiment, feed intake was recorded every day. Body weights (BW) of experimental animals were weighed every month.

Carcass evaluation

At the end of the experimental period, animals were fasted for 24 h, weighed, and slaughtered at a commercial abattoir located in Deagu, Korea. Carcass was chilled for 24 h at 4°C followed by characterizing the carcass including carcass yield and meat quality. Carcass was given appropriate meat grades by meat judgement according to the criteria provided by Livestock Quality Assessment [8].

Analysis of chemical composition of carcass
Sampling

Musculus longissimus lumborum muscles were obtained from the 12th and 13th rib section. Muscle samples were then placed in cooler at 0°C–5°C for further analysis. Fat was removed from the samples and was pulverized with a Hanil Mini Cooking Cutter (HMC-150T, Hanil Electric, Seoul, Korea). Samples were stored at −80°C for fatty acid analysis.

Chemical composition

Contents of crude protein, crude fat, moisture, and ash of carcass was analyzed based on the protocol provided by AOAC [9]. First, 2 g of muscle samples were homogenized and dried at 105°C and moisture content (%) was determined by weight loss upon drying in an oven. Next, a muffle furnace was used to determine ash content according to the AOAC method. Total fat content was determined using the Soxhlet extraction method after completing the measurement of moisture content. Finally, crude protein content was measured using the Kjeldahl nitrogen analysis. Briefly, longissimus dorsi muscle samples (0.5 g) were digested at 450°C for 5 h, distilled, and neutralized by the addition of 50% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and titrated with hydrochloric acid (HCl). Content of crude protein was determined by the equation as follows [10]: Crude protein (CP) = % nitrogen (N) × 6.25.

Meat color

Meat colors were displayed as CIE L*, a*, and b* using a Chroma Meter (CR-10, Minolta, Osaka, Japan). The standard color used in this study was set to Y = 94.5, x = 0.3132, and y = 0.3203 according to the manual, and three parts per sample were measured and expressed as an average value.

Fatty acid composition of longissimus lumborum muscle

Fat extraction for fatty acid composition analysis of longissimus dorsi muscle fat was performed by extracting fat according to Folch et al. [11], followed by methylation of fatty acids in keeping with the method of Lepage and Roy [12], and analyzed by gas chromatography [13]. Briefly, we took approximately 3 g of the sample pulverized at −80°C (in liquid nitrogen), thawed it slightly, placed it in a glass tube, and added 5 ml of chloroform:methanol (2:1). Then, we ground it for 2–3 min at 11,000 rpm using a homogenizer (Polytron PT-MR-2100, Kinematica AG, Malters, Switzerland) and filtered it using an aspirator (Tokyo Rikaikai, Tokyo, Japan) after 30 min. Subsequently, 8 mL of 0.74% KCl was added, and the sample was left in a cold chamber for approximately 2 h. Next, the supernatant was separated, lower layer was transferred to a scintillating vial, and solvent was volatilized for approximately 2 h using nitrogen in a 70°C water bath. Extracted FAMEs were mixed with 2 mL methanol:benzene (4:1, v/v), 200 μL acetyl chloride, 1 mL isooctane, and 8 mL 6% potassium carbonate (K2CO3), followed by centrifuged at 1,200×g for 10 min. The supernatant was analyzed by a gas chromatograph (Clarus 500, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a fused silica capillary column (Supleco SP-2560, 100 m × 0.25 mm). Experimental samples (1 μL) were then injected into the vials (split ratio 100:1 at 250°C) with nitrogen as a carrier gas and flame ionization detector (FID) at 270°C. The oven temperature was set at 170°C for 5 min, increased 2°C per min up-to 220°C, and finally held for 40 min.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained from this study were analyzed using the generalized linear model (GLM) method in SAS [14]. In addition, the significance of each experimental group was tested using Duncan’s multiple-range test; significance was considered at p < 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Growth performance

The growth performance of Holstein steers considering the energy feeding level is shown in Table 5. During the fattening phase, there were no significant differences in ADG and BW among the experimental groups. However, the final BW of T4 experimental group at the end of the finishing phase was higher than that of T1 experimental group (820.31 and 745.57 kg, respectively; p < 0.05). The ADG of the finishing phase was significantly higher in T2 experimental group than in T1experimental group (1.27 and 1.11 kg, respectively; p < 0.05) in the 22-month group. However, there was no difference among the experimental groups in the 24-month group. The ADG of the overall period was also higher in T2 experimental group than in T1 experimental group (1.26 and 1.12 kg, respectively; p < 0.05).

Table 5. Effect of energy feeding levels on performance Holstein steers
Item 22 month 24 month SEM p-value1)
T12) T2 T3 T4
No. of heads 10 10 10 10
Body weight (kg)
 Initial (7.7 month) 240.54 231.02 233.23 232.03 3.82 0.6816
 Fattening (11 month) 372.27 370.02 363.12 369.01 12.87 0.2247
 Finishing (22–24 month) 745.57b 797.64ab 810.52ab 820.31a 20.15 0.0923
Average daily gain(kg)
 Fattening phase 1.18 1.24 1.16 1.22 0.04 0.1230
 Finishing phase 1.11b 1.27a 1.15ab 1.16ab 0.05 0.0812
 Overall period 1.12b 1.26a 1.15ab 1.17ab 0.06 0.0913

1) Probability of the F test.

2) Each group were set to 70% (T1) and 72% (T2) during fattening phase and 74% (T3) and 76% (T4) for the finishing phase, respectively.

a,b Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly (p < 0.05) different.

Download Excel Table

No difference was observed in feed intake (Table 6) and TDN intake (Table 7) between the experimental groups. However, compared to T1 experimental group, T2 experimental group showed decreases in the FCR and TDN conversion ratio by 10.23% and 7.73%, respectively, in the finishing phase. Holstein cattle generally show higher ADG when fed high-energy feeds during all fattening periods except when they were calves [15]. In particular, a higher energy feeding level during the finishing phase is reported to significantly increase the BW gain [16]. Studies have reported that raising the energy feeding level of beef cattle increases the feed efficiency rather than the feed intake [17,18], and our study showed similar results. The results of our study showed that 22-month group (T2) with higher energy feeding levels showed a significant improvement in the ADG and FCR over the 24-month group (T4). This could be attributed to the feeding program used in this study (Table 4) which maximized feed intake during the finishing phase to induce rapid growth. In addition, the ADG of the 24-month slaughter age group decreased as the finishing phase got relatively longer. In addition, it has been reported that the ADG and feed efficiency of Holstein steers considerably decreases after the 22-month slaughter age [2].

Table 6. Feed intake and feed conversion in Holstein steers
Item 22 month 24 month p-value1)
T12) T2 T3 T4
Fattening phase
 Feed intake (kg/head/day) 8.75 8.88 8.73 8.63
  Concentrate 6.65 6.67 6.64 6.61 0.8724
  Rice straw 2.10 2.21 2.09 2.02 0.6816
 Feed conversion ratio (kg/kg) 7.42 7.16 7.46 7.02
Finishing phase
 Feed intake (kg/head/day) 13.40 13.43 12.45 12.30
  Concentrate 11.98 11.94 11.24 11.01 0.8156
  Rice straw 1.42 1.49 1.21 1.29 0.6487
 Feed conversion ratio (kg/kg) 11.75 10.66 10.73 10.25
Overall period
 Feed intake (kg/head/day) 11.18 11.16 11.98 11.93
  Concentrate 9.32 9.31 10.40 10.28 0.2748
  Rice straw 1.86 1.85 1.57 1.65 0.3487
 Feed conversion ratio (kg/kg) 9.72 8.93 10.49 9.67

1) Probability of the F test.

2) Each group were set to 70% (T1) and 72% (T2) during fattening phase and 74% (T3) and 76% (T4) for the finishing phase, respectively.

Download Excel Table
Table 7. TDN intake and TDN conversion in Holstein steers
Item 22 month 24 month p-value1)
T12) T2 T3 T4
Fattening phase
 TDN intake (kg/head/day) 5.45 5.63 5.43 5.52
  Concentrate 4.66 4.80 4.65 4.76 0.6287
  Rice straw 0.79 0.83 0.78 0.76 0.7854
 TDN conversion ratio (kg/kg) 5.32 4.54 4.64 4.49
Finishing phase
 TDN intake (kg/head/day) 9.39 9.63 8.76 8.85
  Concentrate 8.86 9.07 8.31 8.37 0.5932
  Rice straw 0.53 0.56 0.45 0.48 0.6271
 TDN conversion ratio (kg/kg) 8.23 7.64 7.55 7.38
Overall period
 TDN intake (kg/head/day) 8.37 8.60 8.04 8.12
  Concentrate 7.77 7.97 7.51 7.57 0.2748
  Rice straw 0.60 0.63 0.53 0.54 0.3487
 TDN conversion ratio (kg/kg) 7.28 6.88 6.93 6.70

1) Probability of the F test.

2) Each group were set to 70% (T1) and 72% (T2) during fattening phase and 74% (T3) and 76% (T4) for the finishing phase, respectively.

TDN, total digestible nutrients.

Download Excel Table
Carcass characteristics

The cold carcass weight of T4 experimental group was higher than that of T1 experimental group (458.72 and 417.13 kg, respectively; p < 0.05), as shown in Table 8. However, there was no significant differences in the back fat thickness and longissimus area between the experimental groups. Regarding the marbling score, T2 and T4 experimental groups, which were fed at a higher energy feeding level, showed increases of 13.40% and 7.11% compared to T1 and T3 experimental groups, respectively. Difference, however, was not statistically significant. The experimental groups did not differ in other meat qualities such as meat color, fat color, or texture. Holstein steers generally have thinner back fat and lower marbling score than other beef cattle breeds, such as Hanwoo and Wagyu [7,19]. A study has reported that 24 Holstein steers slaughtered at 22 months of age had an average marbling score of 2.10–3.60, similar to the present study [20]. However, as shown in the results of our study, there was no significant difference in the back fat thickness and marbling score in the experimental groups with high-energy feeding levels. These results are because Holstein steers accumulate body fat at a lower rate than other beef cattle breeds.

Table 8. Effect of energy feeding levels on carcass characteristics in Holstein steers
Item 22 month 24 month SEM p-value1)
T12) T2 T3 T4
Body weight
 Market weight (kg) 754.57b 794.64ab 803.52ab 820.31a 20.15 0.0923
 Cold carcass weight (kg) 417.13b 444.12ab 442.90ab 458.72a 8.57 0.0865
 Carcass percentage (%) 55.28 55.89 55.12 55.92
Yield traits
 Backfat thickness (mm) 6.87 7.72 7.31 8.01 0.83 0.1015
 Longissimus muscle area (cm2) 78.21 80.21 81.14 82.12 2.88 0.6949
Yield grade (%)
 A 10.00 (1) 10.00 (1) ND ND
 B 80.00 70.00 (7) 90.00 (9) 90.00 (9)
 C 10.00 (1) 20.00 (2) 10.00 (1) 10.00 (1)
Quality traits3)
 Marbling score 2.61 2.96 2.81 3.01 0.44 0.1174
 Meat color 4.34 4.47 4.67 5.01 0.19 0.1869
 Fat color 2.51 2.51 2.56 2.53 0.03 0.1038
 Texture 1.94 1.87 1.90 2.01 0.05 0.3872
 Maturity 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.0000
Quality grade (%)
 1+ ND 10.00 (1) ND 10.00 (1)
 1 10.00 (1) 10.00 (1) 20.00 (2) 10.00 (1)
 2 60.00 (6) 60.00 (6) 60.00 (6) 70.00 (7)
 3 30.00 (3) 20.00 (2) 20.00 (2) 10.00 (1)

1) Probability of the F test.

2) Each group were set to 70% (T1) and 72% (T2) during fattening phase and 74% (T3) and 76% (T4) for the finishing phase, respectively.

3) Marbling score: 9 = the most abundant, 1 = devoid; meat color: 7 = dark red, 1 = b right red; fat color: 7 = yellowish, 1 = white, texture: 3 = coarse, 1 = fine; maturit: 9 = mature, 1 = youthful.

a,b Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly (p < 0.05) different.

ND, not detected.

Download Excel Table
Physicochemical characteristics of carcass

Among the physicochemical characteristics of the carcass, the moisture and crude protein content did not differ by experimental groups (Table 9). The crude fat content increased to 12.74% in T2 experimental group compared to T1 experimental group, but there was no significant difference. The meat CIE values also showed no difference among the experimental groups. In general, the physicochemical characteristics of the carcass are reported to be significantly affected by the marbling score, and Holstein steers, which do not have a high marbling score, are known to have a slight variance in the physicochemical characteristics [21]. Studies have reported that among the physicochemical characteristics of the beef carcass, the crude fat content increases, and the moisture and crude protein content decrease as the meat quality grade increases [22]. In the recent specification test results of Holstein steers between the slaughter age of 20 to 24 months, it was reported that there was no significant difference in the physicochemical characteristics of carcass between the experimental groups [2], which is similar to the results of our study.

Table 9. Effect of energy feeding levels on physicochemical characteristics of longissimus dorsi muscle in Holstein steers
Item 22 month 24 month SEM p-value1)
T12) T2 T3 T4
Moisture (%) 66.79 66.32 66.20 66.12 0.74 0.4513
Crude fat (%) 10.52 11.86 11.02 11.96 0.85 0.1952
Crude protein (%) 21.03 20.03 20.77 20.11 0.31 0.2398
CIE value
 L* 39.77 41.35 40.72 40.12 1.17 0.1289
 a* 21.07 20.98 20.88 20.34 0.73 0.4215
 b* 9.52 9.02 9.52 8.99 0.38 0.2187
 Chroma 22.37 23.01 23.52 23.77 0.89 0.4874
 hue 24.44 25.01 24.33 24.77 0.67 0.1528

1) Probability of the F test.

2) Each group were set to 70% (T1) and 72% (T2) during fattening phase and 74% (T3) and 76% (T4) for the finishing phase, respectively.

a,b Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly (p < 0.05) different.

Download Excel Table
Fatty acid composition

Among the fatty acid compositions of longissimus lumborum muscle, the contents of saturated fatty acids (SFA) C14:0 and C16:0 did not differ between the experimental groups. However, the C18:0 content was significantly lower in the T4 experimental group than in the T1 experimental group (p < 0.05) (Table 10). Similarly, the content of C18:1, the major unsaturated fatty acid (UFA) of beef, did not differ by experimental groups, but the content of C18:2 for T4 experimental group was higher than those of the experimental groups that had lower energy feeding levels (T1 and T3; p < 0.05). However, the contents of SFA, UFA, and monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) did not differ between the experimental groups. In general, it has been reported that in the fatty acid composition of beef cattle, the contents of C16:0 and C18:0 decrease, and the contents of C18:1 and UFA increase as the meat quality grade increases [2325]. Similarly, in line with our study, studies have reported that there were no significant differences in the contents of SFA, UFA, and MUFA between the carcasses of different experimental groups of Holstein steers slaughtered at 18, 21, and 24 months of age [26,27].

Table 10. Effect of energy feeding levels on fatty acid of longissimus lumborum muscle in Holstein steers
Item 22 month 24 month SEM p-value1)
Fatty acid (%) T12) T2 T3 T4
C14:0 3.42 3.32 3.23 3.11 0.14 0.1534
C14:1 0.81 1.11 0.93 0.97 0.13 0.5112
C15:0 0.31 0.3 0.29 0.27 0.02 0.8123
C15:1 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.01 0.8452
C16:0 27.01 26.11 27.34 26.81 1.12 0.2125
C16:1 4.99 5.23 4.98 4.6 0.28 0.3879
C17:0 0.74 0.87 0.79 0.78 0.05 0.4321
C17:1 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.01 0.8491
C18:0 12.92 11.87 11.1 9.41 0.89 0.0842
C18:1 47.71 49.14 47.67 50.02 1.52 0.1854
C18:2 2.17b 2.88ab 2.23b 3.27a 0.22 0.0977
C18:3 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.2717
C20:0 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.02 0.7813
C20:3 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.02 0.5218
C20:4 0.2 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.05 0.2987
SFA 44.58 42.62 42.89 40.53 2.14 0.1432
MUFA 53.65 55.64 53.74 55.74 1.21 0.5157
UFA 56.23 58.94 56.37 59.43 1.87 0.1021

1) Probability of the F test.

2) Each group were set to 70% (T1) and 72% (T2) during fattening phase and 74% (T3) and 76% (T4) for the finishing phase, respectively.

a,b Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly (p < 0.05) different.

SFA, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; UFA, unsaturated fatty acid.

Download Excel Table

CONCLUSION

It is crucial to optimize the factors such as energy levels included in feed and the fattening period to maximize the profit of cattle production. Results from our study indicate that Holstein steers fed a high energy level diet for 22 month showed greater ADG as well as increase in fat content of cold carcass. Furthermore, a high energy level diet for 24 months produced a greater cold carcass weight with higher linoleic acid content, which is a polyunsaturated omega 6 fatty acid. These results warrant further studies on the effect of different energy levels and fattening periods on meat quality and consumers preference.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Myung JH, Jung KK.

Data curation: Park S, Myung JH.

Formal analysis: Kim SI, Lee HS.

Methodology: Lee JH.

Software: Kim DH.

Validation: Park S, Kim DH, Jung KK.

Writing - original draft: Kim SI.

Writing - review & editing: Kim SI, Park S, Lee HS, Lee JH, Kim DH, Myung JH, Jung KK.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Committee of Yeungnam University, Korea (approval #: YUH-12-0340-016).

REFERENCES

1.

Grant RJ, Stock R, Mader TL. Feeding and managing Holstein steers. Lincoln, NE: Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 1966

2.

Kim SI, Park S, Myung JH, Jo YM, Choi CB, Jung KK. Effect of fattening period on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and economic traits of Holstein steers. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021; 63:1008-17

3.

Huerta-Leidenz NO, Cross HR, Savell JW, Lunt DK, Baker JF, Pelton LS, et al. Comparison of the fatty acid composition of subcutaneous adipose tissue from mature Brahman and Hereford cows. J Anim Sci. 1993; 71:625-30

4.

Ntunde BN, Usborne WR, Ashton GC. Responses in meat characteristics of Holstein–Friesian males to castration and diet. Can J Anim Sci. 1977; 57:449-58

5.

Gareett WN. Energetic efficiency of beef and dairy steers. J Anim Sci. 1971; 32:451-6

6.

Short RE, Grings EE, MacNeil MD, Heitschmidt RK, Williams CB, Bennett GL. Effects of sire growth potential, growing-finishing strategy, and time on feed on performance, composition, and efficiency of steers. J Anim Sci. 1999; 77:2406-17

7.

Kang SW, Oh YK, Kim KH, Choi CW, Son YS. Study on comparison of growth performance, feed efficiency and carcass characteristics for Holstein and F1(Holstein ♀ × Hanwoo ♂) steers and heifers. J Anim Sci Technol. 2005; 47:593-606

8.

KAPE [Korean Instititue for Animal Products Quality Evaluation]. Annual report for animal products research. Sejong: Korean Instititue for Animal Products Quality Evaluation. 2016

9.

AOAC [Association of Official Analytical Chemists] International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18 th ed Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International. 2000

10.

Giotto FM, Fruet APB, Nörnberg JL, Calkins CR, de Mello AS. Effects of muscle and finishing diets containing distillers grains with low moisture levels on fatty acid deposition in two novel value-added beef cuts. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2020; 40:484-94

11.

Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957; 226:497-509

12.

Lepage G, Roy CC. Direct transesterification of all classes of lipids in a one-step reaction. J Lipid Res. 1986; 27:114-20

13.

Choi SH, Park SK, Choi CW, Li XZ, Kim KH, Kim WY, et al. The expression of adipogenic genes in adipose tissues of Feedlot steers fed supplementary palm oil or soybean oil. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016; 29:404-12

14.

SAS Institute. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. 2002

15.

Hermesmeyer GN, Berger LL, Nash TG, Brandt RT. Effects of energy intake, implantation, and subcutaneous fat end point on feedlot steer performance and carcass composition. J Anim Sci. 2000; 78:825-31

16.

Bodine TN, Purvis HT. Effects of supplemental energy and/or degradable intake protein on performance, grazing behavior, intake, digestibility, and fecal and blood indices by beef steers grazed on dormant native tallgrass prairie. J Anim Sci. 2003; 81:304-17

17.

Pordomingo AJ, Wallace JD, Freeman AS, Galyean ML. Supplemental corn grain for steers grazing native rangeland during summer. J Anim Sci. 1991; 69:1678-87

18.

DelCurto T, Cochran RC, Harmon DL, Beharka AA, Jacques KA, Towne G, et al. Supplementation of dormant tallgrass-prairie forage: I. influence of varying supplemental protein and(or) energy levels on forage utilization characteristics of beef steers in confinement. J Anim Sci. 1990; 68:515-31

19.

Matsuzaki M, Takizawa S, Ogawa M. Plasma insulin, metabolite concentrations, and carcass characteristics of Japanese Black, Japanese Brown, and Holstein steers. J Anim Sci. 1997; 75:3287-93

20.

Cho WM, Yang SH, Lee SM, Jang SS, Kim HC, Hong SK, et al. Effects of different additives on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of Holstein steers. J Life Sci. 2012; 22:161-6

21.

Jung KK, Kim DG, Sung SK, Choi CB, Kim SG, Kim DY, et al. Effect of castration on the carcass grade of Hanwoo and Holstein. Korean J Anim Sci. 1996; 38:249-60

22.

Nelson JL, Dolezal HG, Ray FK, Morgan JB. Characterization of certified Angus beef steaks from the round, loin, and chuck. J Anim Sci. 2004; 82:1437-44

23.

Jeong J, Seong NI, Hwang IK, Lee SB, Yu MS, Nam IS, et al. Effects of level of CP and TDN in the concentrate supplement on growth performances and carcass characteristics in Hanwoo steers during final fattening period. J Anim Sci Technol. 2010; 52:305-12

24.

Smith SB, Yang A, Larsen TW, Tume RK. Positional analysis of triacylglycerols from bovine adipose tissue lipids varying in degree of unsaturation. Lipids. 1998; 33:197-207

25.

Waldman RC, Suess GG, Brungardt VH. Fatty acids of certain bovine tissue and their association with growth, carcass and palatability traits. J Anim Sci. 1968; 27:632-5

26.

Liu T, Wu JP, Lei ZM, Zhang M, Gong XY, Cheng SR, et al. Fatty acid profile of muscles from crossbred Angus-Simmental, Wagyu-Simmental, and Chinese Simmental cattles. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2020; 40:563-77

27.

Kim SI, Cho BR, Choi CB. Effects of sesame meal on growth performances and fatty acid composition, free amino acid contents, and panel tests of loin of Hanwoo steers. J Anim Sci Technol. 2013; 55:451-60