PDF Download
PubReader
Export Citation
Email the Author
Share Facebook
Share Twitter
Cited by 3 Articles
Metrics (View:13,360)
INTRODUCTION
A modernistic challenge in livestock industry is to exploit the use of certain additives that could boost the livestock production [1]. Over the past centuries, antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) are widely accepted as a potential alternative [2]. However, overuse on specific antibiotics in animals’ feedstuff generate bacterial resistance and cause severe health issues to the consumers. As a consequence, the European Union (EU) and other countries including, Korea have prohibited the use of certain antibiotics in animal feedstuff since 2011 [3]. Farmers, researchers, and feed industries have concerns on both animal and consumers health and thus prompted them to find suitable alternatives strategies to replace AGP. Among different strategies, the products based on organic acids have been addressed several times with a promising result in controlling gut disease and enhancing the growth performance of pigs and poultry [4,5]. For instance, Upadhaya et al. [6] reported that inclusion of protected organic acid in the diet of growing pig enhanced the growth performance by improving the microbial inhabitants. Similarly, Devi et al. [7] noted that protected organic acid blend supplement improved the performance of sows and their litters. Besides, medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) have been shown as a good alternative for antibiotics in piglets, due to its antibacterial activity. In 2013, Zentek et al. [8] addressed that combination of organic acid and MCFA enhanced the intestinal microbial-ecology of piglets.
Acidifiers, especially formic acid, and its salt have been permitted to use in animal feeding. Even EU has approved to use 12 g/kg formic acid (as a flavoring agent) in the diet of pigs [9]. The addition of formic acid showed a positive result in weaning, growing and finishing pigs [10-12]. Previously, Øverland et al. [13] stated that formic acid had a stronger antibacterial effect on coliform bacteria in the small intestine compared to benzoic acid. Bolduan et al. [14] and Maribo et al. [15] demonstrated that increasing level of formic acid from 0.35% to 1.4% (combined with lactic acid) in the diet of pigs reduced the gastric pH. Similarly, Mroz et al. [16] noted the impact of formic acid supplementation in gestation and lactation sows’ and reported that the inclusion of 1% formic acid has no effect on the body mass of sows from pregnancy to lactation, whereas it significantly increased the feed intake (FI) during lactation, and slightly improved litter size and piglet birth weight. Though previous studies showed the beneficial effects of dietary organic acids and formic acid in pigs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to find, sows fed diet supplemented with blend of short- and medium chain organic acids (SGG) during late gestation and lactation period has a carry-over effect on the post-weaning growth rate. We hypothesized that inclusion of 1.5 kg/ton and/or 3 kg/ton SSG supplement to sow diet during gestation and lactation period and subsequent feeding with a synergistic blend of free and buffered organic acid (FMP) could enhance the growth performance of piglets. Thus, the purpose this study is to examine whether sows fed with SGG has a carryover effect on post-weaning growth rate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The research protocol (License No: DK-2-2005) was approved by Dankook University (Korea) ethical committee, including the Animal Care and Use, prior to the trail.
SGG is a free-flowing powder based on a blend of a synergistic blend of short chain organic acids (formic acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, propionic acid, citric acid, and sorbic acid) combined with MCFA (C8-caprylic acid, C10- caproic acid, and C12-lauric acid). FMP is a synergistic blend of free and buffered organic acid (ammonium formate). SGG and FMP supplements used in this study was commercially procured from Trouw Nutrition (Amersfoort, Netherlands).
A total of one-hundred and fifty multiparous sows (n = 50/treatment, Landrace × Yorkshire) (average parity, 2.4) were assigned to 1 of 3 dietary treatments: CON - corn-soybean meal-based basal diet, SGG-Low – CON+ 1.5 kg/ton SGG, and SGG-High – CON + 3 kg/ton SGG during gestation and lactation. The basal diets (gestation and lactation) were formulated to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous according to the NRC [17] nutrient recommendations of sows (Tables 1 and 2). At 107th day sows were moved to farrowing crates and fed with gestation diet. After parturition sows were fed with 2.5 kg/day lactation diet, the quantity of diet offerings was gradually increased to ad libitum access during day 5 of lactation. The progenies were weighed immediately after farrowing, the litter size at birth per sow, and mortality ratio were also recorded. At the time of weaning (day 21 of age), sows were removed from the farrowing crate, then pigs within treatments were divided into two groups and randomly distributed in 20 replicates (n = 5 piglets/pen).
1) Provided per kg of complete diet: 16,800IU vitamin A; 2,400IU vitamin D3; 108mg vitamin E; 7.2mg vitamin K; 18mg Riboflavin; 80.4mg Niacin; 2.64mg Thiamine; 45.6mg D-Pantothenic; 0.06mg. Cobalamine; 12mg Cu (as CuSO4); 60mg Zn (as ZnSO4); 24mg Mn (as MnSO4); 0.6mg I (as Ca(IO3)2); 0.36mg Se (as Na2SeO3).
At weaning, six hundred piglets (6.72 ± 0.5 kg) which weaned from sows supplemented with three levels of SGG (Control, SGG-Low, and SGG-High) were allocated to two weaner diets (CON and FMP – 3 kg/ton) following 3 × 2 factorial arrangement for 42 days. A corn-soybean-meal based basal diets were formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient recommendations of NRC [17] (Table 3). A master-batch of the basal diet (weaning) was prepared in mash form then FMP additive was top dressed into pre-marked feed bags, mixed well using DK-801 feed mixer (Daedong Tech, Anyang, Korea), and offered to pigs from days 0–21 (Phase 1) and days 22–42 (Phase 2). All pigs were housed in an environmentally controlled room with slatted plastic floor and had free access to feed and water throughout the experimental period. Ambient temperature was approximately 30°C and it was reduced by 1°C in each week of the experiment. To impose a small challenge to the animals and create stress, less cleaning was done at the facility during the experimental period.
The body weight (BW) of individual pigs was recorded at initial and at the end of d 21 and 42 to determine the average daily gain (ADG). The amount of FI and remaining was recorded at the end of d 21 and 42 to determine the ADG and feed conversion ratio (FCR).
Fresh and clean fecal samples (50g) were randomly collected from 2 pigs pen (both sex) (40 pigs /treatment) at d 21 and 42 by rectal palpation to determine the effect of additives on the microbiota. After collection, the samples were homogenized, diluted with sterile saline and immediately taken to laboratory to check for the presence of Lactobacillus, Clostridium perfringens and E. colicounts. One gram of fecal sample was diluted (1:10) with peptone water and mixed with vortex mixer. Then 0.1% peptone solution was serially diluted (101 to 109), and given to MRS agar (Difco, USA), MacConkey agar (Difco, USA), and Clostridium perfringens agar (MB cell, Korea) to determine the Lactobacillus, E. coli, and C. perfringens,respectively. MRS agar plates were incubated anaerobically at 37°C to 38°C for 24 hours, whereas MacConkey agar and Clostridium perfringens agar plates were incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 48 hours. Later the plates were taken out, the colonies were enumerated and log transferred for statistical analysis.
The current data were analyzed as a completely randomized block design, with a 3 × 2 factorial design using the GLM procedure of SAS (Cary, NC, USA). The statistical model considered the main effects of sow treatment and weaner diet and their interactions. The batch was included as a random effect. Phases of growth were demonstrated as repeated measures on the pen as a subject. Variability in the data is expressed as the standard error means. Probability values p < 0.05 and p< 0.10 was considered as significant and trends, respectively.
RESULT
The dietary effect of sow diet on growth performance and fecal microbial shedding of weaning pigs is presented in Tables 4 and 5. In the first growth phase (days 0 to 21), no difference was observed in the BW of pigs. However, pigs born to sows supplemented with SGG- Low and high had a higher ADG (p< 0.001) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) (p= 0.044). Whereas, during the second growth phase (days 22 to 42), except BW (p< 0.036) and ADG (p< 0.053), the sow treatments did not affect any of the measured growth parameters. Over the entire growth phases, pigs born to sow supplemented with SGG- high and-low showed higher BW (p= 0.036). Similarly, pigs born to sows supplemented with SGG-Low (+6 g/d) and -High (+9 g/d) had greater ADG than pigs born to sows fed CON diets. However, there were no differences in ADFI and FCR among the sow treatments. The fecal Lactobacillus, E coli and C. perfringens remains similar among the sow treatments in both sampling period.
The dietary effect of weaner diet on growth performance and fecal microbial shedding of weaning pigs is presented in Tables 4 and 5. The ADG, ADFI and FCR in the first growth phase were similar among the weaner diets. However, in the second phase, FMP supplementation increased the ADG (p< 0.001) and tendency to improve the ADFI (p= 0.076), and significantly reduced the FCR of pigs (p= 0.033). Over the entire growth phases, pigs supplemented with FMP had higher BW (p = 0.045), ADG (p= 0.005), and tendency to improve ADFI (p= 0.088), and significantly reduce FCR (p=0.052) compared to pigs in CON group. Also, FMP diet reduced the number of E coli (p= 0.07 and 0.008) and C. perfringens(p= 0.031 and < 0.001) population in pigs at both sampling period.
DISCUSSION
Weaning is the most important stage in a pig’s life that determines the success or failure of production. As the weaning phase begins on day 21, pigs are familiar to digest milk-based protein supplements and have difficulty in accepting plant- and meat-based proteins supplements because of their immature digestive system [18]. It has been postulated that adding in-feed organic acid to the diet of pigs could be the best solution [19]. Previously, many researchers have exemplified the mechanism of organic acid and even proved the benefits of mixed and protected organic acid supplements in swine nutrition. For instance: Suryanarayana et al. [20] reported that dietary organic acid had improved the growth performance and apparent total tract digestibility of pigs. Additionally, Devi et al. [7] demonstrated that the inclusion of 0.2% organic acids supplementation had increased the white blood cell (WBC) and immunoglobulin (IgG) counts in suckling piglets. Moreover, Walsh et al. [21] stated that the addition of 0.4% organic acid blend supplementation to the diet of nursery pigs had improved their growth rate, FI, and feed efficiency. The above reports were consistent with the current study, in which pigs born to sows supplemented with SGG- High and Low showed significantly increased BW, ADG, and ADFI. Also, dietary FMP supplementation showed higher BW, ADG, and ADFI in weaning pigs. However, pig fed diet supplemented with FMP reduce FCR in pigs, which was inconsistent with Metzler and Mosenthin [22] and Suryanarayana et al. [20] who observed an increased FCR in growing pigs fed organic acid supplement. Even Canibe et al. [23] reported that 1.8% of formic acid supplements to the diet of growing pig showed tendency to increase the gain-to-feed (G:F) ratio. Similarly, Ngoc et al. [24] stated that growing pigs diet supplemented with SGG had a positive impact on ADG and G:F. The probable reason for the improvement in BW, ADG, and ADFI of piglets that were born to SGG-Low and -High group sows in this study are mainly due to the antimicrobial activity of synergistic organic acid blend or due to the reduction of harmful microbial inhabitants, which helps to reduce the metabolic need of microbes and increase the availability of dietary energy and nutrients to host animals.
It is becoming increasingly clear that the gut microbiota has a significant impact on the overall health and production of pigs. Besides, the gastrointestinal microbiome of animals is a heterogeneous ecosystem and is dominated by bacteria [25]. Also, it is well documented that gut microbiota could modulate the host physiological regulation, digestion, metabolism, and immune system [26,27]. The current experiment tested the hypothesis that FMP supplement could improve the growth performance of weaning pigs by reducing the pathogenic bacteria. As anticipated, pigs fed FMP diet showed lower number of E coli and C. perfringenshowever, pigs born to sows supplemented with SGG-Low and -High showed no difference on their gut microbiome. Previously, Dibner and Buttin. [28] reported that the inclusion of organic acids in pigs’ diet had increased the Lactobacillus counts however this result was not correlated with the current study. However, in this trial, pigs fed diet supplement with FMP reduced the number of Escherichia coliwas agreed with Li et al. [29] who observed the similar result in pigs fed protected organic acid supplementation. Additionally, Devi et al. [7] reported that the addition of protected organic acid supplement in sows’ diet increased Lactobacillus and reduced the E. coli counts during farrowing and weaning. Also, Upadhaya et al. [6] reported that inclusion of 0.1% organic acid mixture (10% malic, 13% citric, and 17% fumaric acids) in the diet of growing and finishing pigs had decreased E. coli counts. C. perfringensis a gram-positive, anaerobic, and spore-forming bacillus that may produce major toxin microbiota in animals and humans [30]. Such toxic C. perfringens residents were significantly reduced in pigs fed FMP supplementation during both phases (d 21 and d42). In 2020, Nguyen et al. [31] demonstrated that organic acids could penetrate through the cell wall of bacteria and prevent bacterial growth in the intestine. Besides, many mechanisms could be responsible for the reduction of pathogenic bacteria, yet the reduction of C. perfringens count in this study is probably due to the impact of free and buffered organic acid which helps to prevent the entering of harmful bacteria in the gut.
CONCLUSION
The result of the present study demonstrates that SGG supplement in sow diet has a carry-over effect on piglet’s growth performance. Regardless of sow treatment, pigs fed FMP diet had improved the BW and ADG, and lower the feed efficacy. Also, feeding FMP diets reduced the fecal E. coli and C. perfringenscounts at d42. Thus, we recommend the application of 3kg/ton of SGG supplement in sows’ diet and subsequent feeding of piglets with FMP would be an effective strategy to improve growth rate and reduce pathogenic bacteria in post-weaned piglets.
